solr 6.1.0 folder structure
F:\SolrCloud-6.1.0\solr-6.1.0-shard-1\server\solr\
--- product
--- conf
--- schema.xml
--- solrconfig.xml
--- core.prop
I was reading the debug info incorrectly it is working as expected
...thanks for the help.
Thanks
Jay Potharaju
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 10:58 PM Jay Potharaju
wrote:
> Edwin, I tried escaping the special characters but it does not seems to
> work. I am using 7.7
> Thanks Jeremy for the example
Edwin, I tried escaping the special characters but it does not seems to
work. I am using 7.7
Thanks Jeremy for the example.
id:123:456!789
I do see that the data for the same key is co-located in the same shard by
running. I can see that all the data is co-located in the same shard when
querying th
Hi Erick,
Thank you very much for your response! OK, I understand what you mean and
will flaten the list into multiple fields.
Thanks!
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Hi,
I think your schema/config didn't get through.
Also, which Solr version are you using when you face this issue?
Regards,
Edwin
On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 14:14, Deoxyribonucleic_DNA ... <
deoxyribonucleic_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hi could some one take look at the scheme/config stuff I've set
Hi Shamik,
String fieldType should keep the space. Can you give the full query that
you used when you get the error?
Also, which Solr version are you using?
Regards,
Edwin
On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 at 03:16, shamik wrote:
> Edwin,
>
>The field is a string type, here's the field definition.
>
>
In a word, “no”.
Assuming these are String fields. You’d have to do something like index to
multiple fields, i.e.
rcsb_enzyme_lineage.name1":"NAD(+) glycohydrolase"
rcsb_enzyme_lineage.name2":"Hydrolases"
rcsb_enzyme_lineage.name3":"Hydrolyzing N-glycosyl compounds"
rcsb_enzyme_lineage.name4":"
Hi Solr Users,
Can Solr facet on a particular element in a list?
For example, I have a list with 4 elements as below. Is it possible to
facet on the individual element?
facet on rcsb_enzyme_lineage.name(0), rcsb_enzyme_lineage.name(1), etc??
Thanks!
"rcsb_enzyme_lineage.name":["NAD(+) glyc
Hi Eric,
Thank you for your response!
On the old system, I changed to use docValues=true, and had better
performance. But the searcher was not warmed before I measured it. Also the
local disk was too small so I used an attached volume which turned out was a
big cause of the slow retrieve.
On t
OK..
The intent is to collapse on the field domain..
Here's a query that works fine and the way I want with the Collapsing query
parser..
/select?defType=dismax&fl=score,content,description,keywords,title&fq={!collapse%20field=domain%20nullPolicy=expand}&pf=content^0.05%20description^0.03%20keyw
On 3/26/2019 10:56 AM, Dave Beckstrom wrote:
I'm using Nutch to crawl and index some content. It failed on a SOLR field
defined as a text field when it was trying to insert the following value
for the field:
What precisely does "failed" mean? Can you share the complete error?
It will likely
Edwin,
The field is a string type, here's the field definition.
-Shamik
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
It looks like hl.preserveMulti is only implemented in the Original highlighter.
Has anyone looked at doing this for the Unified highlighter?
We need to preserve order in the highlights for a multi-valued field.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my bl
Would you be willing to share your query-time analysis chain config, and
perhaps the "debug=true" (or "debug=query") output for successful queries
of a similar nature to the problematic ones? Also, re: "only times out on
extreme queries" -- what do you consider to be an "extreme query", in this
con
Hi Everyone,
I'm using Nutch to crawl and index some content. It failed on a SOLR field
defined as a text field when it was trying to insert the following value
for the field:
33011-54192-EWHServer1234-3BA9D1CA-05B6-42BA-9D88-BAD970CAEEC6
The field was defined in the schema.xml as:
The error
While solr-user is not a bad place to ask this question, I suspect you'll
get more answers in java-u...@lucene.apache.org since there is a lot going
on at the Lucene level right now.
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 9:09 AM Ramsey Haddad (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) <
rhadda...@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> We are build
Not quite an answer to your specific qustion, but… There
are a number of reasons why it’s better to run your Tika
process outside of Solr and DIH. Here’s the long form:
https://lucidworks.com/2012/02/14/indexing-with-solrj/
Ignore the RDBMS parts. It’s somewhat old, but should be
adaptable easily.
We are building our needed customizations/extensions on Solr/Lucene 7.7 or 8.0
or later. We are unclear on whether/when to use Intervals vs Span.
We know that Intervals is still maturing (new functionality in 8.0 and probably
on-going for a while?)
But what is the overall intention/guidance? "I
Hi, I am trying to setup Solr for our project which can return full text
searches on PDF documents. I am able to run the sample Tika DIH example
locally on my windows server machine. It can index all PDF documents
recursively in "baseDir" of config xml. Presently "baseDir" points to local
folder o
We are building our needed customizations/extensions on Solr/Lucene 7.7 or 8.0
or later. We are unclear on whether/when to use Intervals vs Span.
We know that Intervals is still maturing (new functionality in 8.0 and probably
on-going for a while?)
But what is the overall intention/guidance? "I
How did you create your “product” collection? It looks like you have the config
resident on your local disk and _not_ on ZooKeeper.
Your configset has to be in ZooKeeper when you create your collection of
course. Do not try to individually edit the core.properties files, that’ll be
very difficu
Hi, I'm currently running into some trouble trying to set up rack awareness
as a cluster policy.
I run my cluster with 3 way replication, currently a few collection-shards
have 4 replicas, which shows as violations under my current set policies:
{
"set-cluster-policy":[
{
"replica":"<2",
"shard":
My previous solr version was 6.1.0 and zoo keeper version was 3.4.6. Now I am
upgrading solr version 8.0.0 and zoo keeper 3.4.13.
In solr 6.1.0 my collection(product) folder server\solr\product
conf
schema.xml
solrconfig.xml
core.properties
In core.properties ::
name=product
shard=shard1
collect
I'm working with a script where I want to send a command to delete all
elements in an index; notably,
/opt/solr/bin/post -c -d "*:*"
When run interactively, this works fine.
However, when run automatically as a cron job, it gives this interesting
output:
Unrecognized argument: "*:*"
If
Jay –
I’m not familiar with the document ID format you mention [having a “:” in the
prefix], but it looks similar to the composite ID routing I’m using.
Document Id format: “a/1!id”
Then I can use a _route_ value of “a/1!” when querying.
Example Doc IDs:
a/1!768456
a/1!563575
b/1!456234
b/1!2456
I'm working with a script where I want to send a command to delete all
elements in an index; notably,
/opt/solr/bin/post -c -d "*:*"
When run interactively, this works fine.
However, when run automatically as a cron job, it gives this interesting
output:
Unrecognized argument: "*:*"
If
26 matches
Mail list logo
