Hello,
We are upgrading to Solr 7.6.0 and noticed that SynonymFilter and
WordDelimiterFilter have been deprecated. Solr doc recommends to use
SynonymGraphFilter and WordDelimiterGraphFilter instead. In current
schema, we have text field type defined as
Ashish:
Deleting and re-adding a replica is not a solution. Even if you did,
that would then be identical only until you started indexing again,
then the stats could skew a bit.
When you index to NRT replicas, the wall clock times that cause the
commits to trigger will be different due to network
Hi (yes again):
We have a simple architecture: 2 SOLR Cloud servers (on servers #1 and #2),
and 3 zookeeper instances (on servers #1, #2, and #3). Things appear to work
fine, and I have confirmed that our basic configuration is correct. But we
are seeing TONS of the following warnings in all of ou
On 12/25/2018 11:23 PM, jay harkhani wrote:
We are using add method of CloudSolrClient for insert data into Solr Cloud
Index. In specific scenario we need to insert record of around 3 MB document
into Solr which takes 5-6 seconds.
Is this a single document that's 3 MB in size, or many documen
On 1/3/2019 11:15 AM, Bob Hathaway wrote:
We want to use SOLR v7 but Sonatype scans past v6.5 show dozens of
critical and severe security issues and dozens of licensing issues.
None of the images that you attached to your message are visible to us.
Attachments are regularly stripped by Apache
Jackson-databind is actually not such an old version. The problem with Jackson
databind is that for deserialization it has just a blacklist of objects not to
deserialize and it is impossible to maintain that blacklist uptodate. For
version 3.0 they change to a whitelist approach it seems which w
Hi Erick,
I have updated that I am not facing this problem in a new collection.
As per 3) I can try deleting a replica and adding it again, but the
confusion is which one out of two should I delete.(wondering which replica
is giving correct score for query)
Both replicas give same number of d
Hi Bob,
Wrt licensing keep in mind that multi licensed software allows you to
choose which license you are using the software under. Also there's some
good detail on the Apache policy here:
https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#what-can-we-not-include-in-an-asf-project-category-x
One has to
DIH is also not designed to multi-thread very well. One way I've handled this
is to have a DIH XML that breaks-up a database query into multiple processes by
taking the modulo of a row, as follows:
This allows me to do sub-queries within the entity, but it is often better to
just write
On 1/4/2019 1:04 AM, 유정인 wrote:
The reader was looking for a way to do 'DIH' automatically.
The reason was for HA configuration.
If you send a DIH request to the collection (as opposed to a specific
core), that request will be load balanced across the cloud. You won't
know which replica/cor
On 1/3/2019 11:26 PM, Doss wrote:
We are planning to setup a SOLR cloud with 6 nodes for 3 million records
(expected to grow to 5 million in a year), with 150 fields and over all
index would come around 120GB.
We plan to use NRT with 5 sec soft commit and 1 min hard commit.
Five seconds is lik
It's usually best to use compositeId routing. That distributes
the load evenly. Otherwise, _you_ have to be responsible
for making sure that the docs are reasonably evenly distributed,
which can be a pain.
Implicit routing is usually best in situations where you index
to a particular shard for a w
I'd like to follow up on this post here because it has become relevant to me
now.
I have set up a debugging environment and took a deep-dive into the SOLR 7.6.0
source code with Eclipse as my IDE of choice for this task. I have isolated the
exact line as to where things fall apart for my two sa
Replicated segments might have different deleted documents by design.
Precise numbers can be achieved via exact stats. see
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/distributed-requests.html#DistributedRequests-ConfiguringstatsCache_DistributedIDF_
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 2:40 PM AshB wrote:
> Ve
How brave are you? ;)
I'll defer to Scott on the internals of ZK and why it
might be necessary to delete the ZK data dirs, but
what happens if you just correct your configuration and
drive on?
If that doesn't work here's something to try
Shut down your Solr instances, then.
- bin/solr zk
On 1/4/2019 5:24 AM, Joe Lerner wrote:
server #1 = myid#1
server #2 = myid#2
server #3 = myid#2
My plan would be to do the following, while users are still online (it's a
big [bad] deal if we need to take search offline):
1. Take zk #3 down.
2. Fix zk #3 by deleting the contents of the zk data
The most important feature of any software running today is that it can be
run at all. Security vulnerabilities can preclude software from running in
enterprise environments. Today software must be free of critical and severe
security vulnerabilities or they can't be run at all from Information
Sec
See particularly point 3 here and to a lesser extent point 2.
https://support.lucidworks.com/s/question/0D5803LRpijCAD/the-number-of-results-returned-is-not-constant-every-time-i-query-solr
For point two (the internal Lucene doc IDs are different) you can
easily correct it by adding sort=score
Hi,
We have a simple architecture: 2 SOLR Cloud servers (on servers #1 and #2),
and 3 zookeeper instances (on servers #1, #2, and #3). Things appear to work
fine but:
We are getting *TONS* of continuous log warnings from our client
applications. From one server it shows this:
[MYAPP-WEB]
wrt, "You'll probably have to delete the contents of the zk data directory
and rebuild your collections."
Rebuild my *SOLR* collections? That's easy enough for us.
If this is how we're incorrectly configured now:
server #1 = myid#1
server #2 = myid#2
server #3 = myid#2
My plan would be to do t
Version Solr 7.4.0 zookeeper 3.4.11 Achitecture Two boxes Machine-1,Machine-2
holding single instances of solr
We are having a collection which was single shard and single replica i.e s=1
and rf=1
Few days back we tried to add replica to it.But the score for same query is
coming different from di
Hi!
When debugging a query using multiplicative boost based on the product()
function I noticed that the score computed in the explain section is correct
while the score in the actual result is wrong.
As an example here’s a simple query that boosts a field name_text_de
(containing German produ
Hi
The reader was looking for a way to do 'DIH' automatically.
The reason was for HA configuration.
Thank you for answer.
If you know how, please reply.
-Original Message-
From: Doss
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2019 3:59 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [solr-solrcloud] H
23 matches
Mail list logo
