Hi
Sounds like it would be worth a low-pri issue. And it would be great if you
guys could experiment to find the necessary changes and then contribute a patch
back to the project, which we will then commit :)
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> 25. aug.
Hi,
SchemaRequestJSONWriter class was removed in SOLR-12455[1], but this change has
not been released yet (will be released with Solr 7.5). I’m guessing you’re
using code built against branch_7x or master? If so, then one solution is to
build against the released source for any 7.x version.
Please share your security.json for us to be able to tell whether you
configured something wrong
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> 24. aug. 2018 kl. 21:28 skrev Rathor, Piyush (US - Philadelphia)
> :
>
> Hi Team,
>
> We are implementing Authorization
SOLR 7.4.0
On Windows, solr.cmd creates solr-*.port files in SOLR_TIP\bin. It would be
nice if the location of these files could be configurable (SOLR_PID_DIR kind
of makes sense?)
Would this be worth a lower-priority bug?
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
SOLR 7.4.0
We recently encountered an issue on Windows where the cleanup/uninstall
processes for our product were having difficulties deleting "hsperf"
directories created in SOLR's data directory. Somehow, these directories
ended up with permissions preventing anyone from deleting them. Further
i
Got the following errow when i try to delete a field with Schema API, on
Solr 7.0.1, cloud model
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.schema.SchemaRequest$SchemaRequestJSONWriter.writeString(Ljava/lang/String;)V
at
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.schema.SchemaR
SOLR 7.4.0
In the linux solr script, LOG4J_PROPS is expected to be the path to a custom
log4j2.xml file. LOG4J_CONFIG ends up being a collection of all
-Dlog4j.configurationFile=BLAH parameter strings.
In the windows solr.cmd script, LOG4J_PROPS is not respected at all. And
LOG4J_CONFIG is expe
Hi Team,
We are implementing Authorization in SOLR version 7.3.0. We are able to create
non-admin user but the user still has admin access (access to core, access to
create fields).
Can you please let us know how can we remove access to core, access to create
fields from non-admin user using Au
Sorry, yes 10,000 ms.
We have a single test cluster (out of probably hundreds) where one node hits
this consistently. I'm not sure what kind of issues (network?) that node is
having.
Generally though, we ship SOLR as part of our product, and we cannot control
our customers' hardware and setup be
I got the debug info like this. It turns out that queryNorm is
negative so the total solr score is negative too. It is not really a
problem for me. But I'm curious why it can even be negative after
reading its definition (1/sumOfSquaredWeights)?
-1.1151254E-4 = (MATCH) product of:
-0.0032338637
On 8/24/2018 12:44 AM, dami...@gmail.com wrote:
Shawn, Is it possible to run optimize on the live collection? For example,
/solr/collection/update?commit=true&optimize=true
For all the reasons in the blog post that Erick referenced, we recommend
that you do not do this.
Something to note: T
There might be something like fq=filter(foo:[2 TO 3]) OR filter(foo:[3 TO
100])
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 2:23 PM zhenyuan wei wrote:
> Hi All，
> I am confuse about How to hit filterCache？
>
> If filterQuery is range [3 to 100] , but not cache in FilterCache，
> and filterCache already exists fil
On 8/24/2018 5:23 AM, zhenyuan wei wrote:
I am confuse about How to hit filterCache？
If filterQuery is range [3 to 100] , but not cache in FilterCache，
and filterCache already exists filterQuery range [2 to 100],
My question is " Dose this filterQuery range [3 to 100] will fetch DocSet
from
On 8/24/2018 5:17 AM, zhenyuan wei wrote:
Thanks again~ @Shawn @Jan Høydahl
What is the recommend size of one shard？or how many docs per shard is
recommend?
My collection has 20 shard，each shard is 30~50GB。
There are no general rules. Every situation will be different, and
advice that works f
Thank you for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12691.
I see it's marked as minor. Can we bump up the priority please ?
The example of 2 cores ingest + transientCacheSize==1 was provided for
reproduction reference only, and is not running in not production.
Production setup on AWS use
Yes, it's possible to run optimize on a live index. I wouldn't though, see:
https://lucidworks.com/2017/10/13/segment-merging-deleted-documents-optimize-may-bad/
Lucene has _never_ guaranteed proper functioning of an index created
with version X-2 with
version X. It hasn't been super-obvious, but
Hi,
No it will not and it does not make sense to - it would still have to apply
filter on top of cached results since they can include values with 2. You can
consider a query as entry into cache.
Thanks,
Emir
--
Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection
Solr & Elasticsearch Cons
Hi All，
I am confuse about How to hit filterCache？
If filterQuery is range [3 to 100] , but not cache in FilterCache，
and filterCache already exists filterQuery range [2 to 100],
My question is " Dose this filterQuery range [3 to 100] will fetch DocSet
from FilterCache range[2 to 100]" ?
Thanks again~ @Shawn @Jan Høydahl
What is the recommend size of one shard？or how many docs per shard is
recommend?
My collection has 20 shard，each shard is 30~50GB。
@Shawn according to your wiki and e-mail reply，
to achieve a better query performance ，I estimate the RAM requirement like
follow：
7
19 matches
Mail list logo
