Actually you're second example is probably a straight forward:
reduce(select(...), group(...), by="k1")
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 7:33 PM, Joel Bernstein wrote:
> Take a look at the reduce() function. You'll have to write a custom reduce
> operation b
Take a look at the reduce() function. You'll have to write a custom reduce
operation but you can follow the example here:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/master/solr/solrj/src/java/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/io/ops/GroupOperation.java
You can plug in your custom reduce operation in t
We have to check the behavior of the innerJoin. I suspect that its closing
the second stream when the first stream his finished. This would cause a
broken pipe with the second stream. The export handler has specific code
that eats the broken pipe exception so it doesn't end up in the logs. The
sele
On 6/12/2018 12:06 PM, Chris Troullis wrote:
> The issue we are seeing is with 1 collection in particular, after we set up
> CDCR, we are getting extremely slow response times when retrieving
> documents. Debugging the query shows QTime is almost nothing, but the
> overall responseTime is like 5x w
On 6/14/2018 12:10 PM, Terry Steichen wrote:
> I don't disagree at all, but have a basic question: How do you easily
> transition from a system using a dynamic schema to one using a fixed one?
Not sure you need to actually transition. Just remove the config in
solrconfig.xml that causes Solr to i
Hi,
I have configured basic auth for solrcloud. it works well when i access the
solr url directly. i have integrated this solr with test.com domain. now if
I access the solr url like test.com/solr it prompts the credentials but I
dont want to ask this time since it is known domain. is there any wa
Shawn,
I don't disagree at all, but have a basic question: How do you easily
transition from a system using a dynamic schema to one using a fixed one?
I'm runnning 6.6.0 in cloud mode (only because it's necessary, as I
understand it, to be in cloud mode for the authentication/authorization
to wor
On 6/8/2018 3:56 AM, SOLR4189 wrote:
> /When a document is sent to a Solr node for indexing, the system first
> determines which Shard that document belongs to, and then which node is
> currently hosting the leader for that shard. The document is then forwarded
> to the current leader for indexing,
On 6/11/2018 2:02 PM, Terry Steichen wrote:
> I am using Solr (6.6.0) in the automatic mode (where it discovers
> fields). It's working fine with one exception. The problem is that
> Solr maps the discovered "meta_creation_date" is assigned the type
> TrieDateField.
>
> Unfortunately, that type
What does that mean exactly? If I set the rows parameter to 10
the exception still occurs. AFAICT all this happens internally during the
processing of the streaming expression. Why wouldn't the select send
the EOF tuple when it reaches the end of the documents?
Or why wouldn't the rec
Hi,
This may be expected if one of the streams is closed early - does not reach to
EOF tuple
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 14, 2018, at 9:53 AM, Christian Spitzlay
> wrote:
>
> Here ist one I stripped down as far as I could:
>
> innerJoin(sort(search(kmm,
> q="sds_endpoint_uuid:(2f927a0b\-f
Hi,
is there a way to merge array values?
Something that transforms
{
"k1": "1",
"k2": ["a", "b"]
},
{
"k1": "2",
"k2": ["c", "d"]
},
{
"k1": "2",
"k2": ["e", "f"]
}
into
{
"k1": "1",
"k2": ["a", "b"]
},
{
"k1": "2",
"k2": ["c", "d", "e", "f"]
}
And an inverse of ca
Here ist one I stripped down as far as I could:
innerJoin(sort(search(kmm,
q="sds_endpoint_uuid:(2f927a0b\-fe38\-451e\-9103\-580914a77e82)",
fl="sds_endpoint_uuid,sds_to_endpoint_uuid", sort="sds_to_endpoint_uuid ASC",
qt="/export"), by="sds_endpoint_uuid ASC"), search(kmm,
q=ss_search_api_dat
My claim is it simply doesn't matter. You either have to have those
bytes laying around on disk in the DV case and using OS memory or in
the cumulative java heap in the non-dv case.
If you're doing one of the three operations I know of no situation
where I would _not_ enable docValues.
The Lucene
Thanks for the detailed explanation erick.
I did a little math as you suggested. Just wanted to see if i am doing it
right.
So we have around 4 billion docs in production and around 70 nodes.
To support the business use case we have around 18 fields on which we have
to enable docvalues for sorting
You can enable DEBUG level for LogUpdateProcessorFactory category
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/228a84fd6db3ef5fc1624d69e1c82a1f02c51352/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/update/processor/LogUpdateProcessorFactory.java#L100
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 5:00 PM, govind nitk wrote:
> H
Depending on what your documents look like, it could be that enabling docValues
would allow you to save space by switching to stored="false" since Solr can
fetch the stored value from docValues. I say it depends on your documents and
use case since sometimes it may be slower to access a docValue
I didn't get any answer to my questions ( unless you meant you have 25
millions of different values for those fields ...)
Please read again my answer and elaborate further.
Do you problem happen for the 2 different suggesters ?
Cheers
-
---
Alessandro Benedetti
Search Consultant
You could also look into the Autoscaling stuff in 7.x which can be programmed
to move shards around based on system load and HW specs on the various nodes,
so in theory that framework (although still a bit unstable) will suggest moving
some replicas from weak nodes over to more powerful ones. If
See this FAQ
https://github.com/docker-solr/docker-solr/blob/master/Docker-FAQ.md#can-i-run-zookeeper-and-solr-clusters-under-docker
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> 8. jun. 2018 kl. 14:52 skrev akshat :
>
> Hi,
>
> I have deployed Solr in docker swar
Anyone from the Solr team who can shed some more light?
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 8:13 PM, Ratnadeep Rakshit
wrote:
> I observed that the build works if the data size is below 25M. The moment
> the records go beyond that, this OOM error shows up. Solar itself shows 56%
> usage of 20GB space during
The approach that Alfresco/Solr takes with this is store the original
document in filesystem when it indexes content. This way you can be frugal
about which fields are stored in the index. Then Alfresco/Solr can retrieve
the original document as part of the results using a doc transformer.
This ma
You could fetch the data from your application directly :;)
Also, the Streaming expressions has a jdbc() function but then you will need to
know what to query for. It also has a fetch() function which enriches documents
with fields from another collection. It would probably be possible to write a
Isn't the Transaction Log what you are looking for ?
Read this good blog post as a reference :
https://lucidworks.com/2013/08/23/understanding-transaction-logs-softcommit-and-commit-in-sorlcloud/
Cheers
-
---
Alessandro Benedetti
Search Consultant, R&D Software Engineer, Direct
Hi,
Facing issue in Solr 7.2.1 Master-slave replication,
Master-slave replication is working fine.
But if I disable replication from master, Slaves shows no data
(numFound=0). Slave in not serving data, it had before replication.
I suspect, Index generation is getting updated in slave, which was
25 matches
Mail list logo
