unsubscribe
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 8:17 PM, Yasufumi Mizoguchi
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found some information about the pink bar from mail archive.
> I think this should be written in ref. guide.
>
>> I think that pink segments are those segments
>> which the system thinks are most likely to be chose
Hi,
I found some information about the pink bar from mail archive.
I think this should be written in ref. guide.
> I think that pink segments are those segments
> which the system thinks are most likely to be chosen for automatic
> merging, according to whatever merge policy you have active. Mos
Hi,
Solr has a nice segments visualization at [core_name]/segments , but I am
wondering what the colors mean?
Gray color is probably deleted documents., But I couldn't guess the
significance of pink color:
Thanks
Nawab
Thanks Yonik,
That is the suspect issue i stumbled upon when reading through the CHANGES.txt.
Can you, or someone, please verify this? I need to know this before i can file
a bug.
There is a definitive difference in 7.2 and 7.3's respective outputs, i triple
checked the debug output. But on on
If this used to work, I wonder if it's something to do with changes to boost:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8099
-Yonik
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 5:48 PM, Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sorry to disturb. Is there anyone here able to reproduce and verify this
> issue?
>
> Many t
Hello,
And sorry to disturb again. Does anyone of you have any meaningful opinion on
this peculiar matter? The RemoveDuplicates filter exists for a reason, but with
query-time KeywordRepeat filter it causes trouble in some cases. Is it normal
for the clauses to be absent in the debug output, bu
Hello,
Sorry to disturb. Is there anyone here able to reproduce and verify this issue?
Many thanks,
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Markus Jelsma
> Sent: Wednesday 9th May 2018 18:25
> To: solr-user
> Subject: Solr 7.3, FunctionScoreQuery no longer displays debug output
>
> Hi,
A simple date range query does not really represent how people query over
time and dates. If you want any form of date queries, above a single
range, then a special field allowing tokenized query will be the only way
to find documents.
A query for 'ever tuesday in november of 2017' would have to
"FQ_filter were 365 but below in the
debugging part the docfreq used in the payload_score calculation was
3360"
If you are talking about the doc frequency of a term, obviously this is
corpus based ( necessary for the TF /IDF calculations) so it wil not be
affected by the filter queries.
The pay
Hi Sonal,
if you want to go with a plain Solr suggester, what about the :
FuzzyLookupFactory ?
1) it does support fuzzy matching ( spellcheck)
2) it does support auto complete
If you want the context filtering as well, unfortunately the FST based Solr
suggesters don't support this feature.
I wou
Hi Terry,
let me go in order :
/"Tried creation_date: 2016-11. That's supposed to match
documents with any November 2016 date. But actually produces:
|"Invalid Date String:'2016-11'| "/
Is "*DateRangeField*" the field type for your field : "creation_date" ? [1]
You mentioned : org.apache.sol
On 5/17/2018 3:03 AM, msaunier wrote:
On solrCloud interface, I don't have with solr4j the info and debug level on
the console. In < level > I have add my URP with INFO param and DEBUG param
but never of the two work. I have just WARN and ERROR log on the interface.
The admin UI won't show anyt
Yeah, dates are "special".
Those abbreviated dates are for DateRangeField, which is a distinct
type from "TrieDate" in your schema.
bq. And Solr doesn't seem to let me sort on a date field
It's not a date field that's the problem, it's the "multiValued" part.
When you specify in your schema that
Ok this is fixed. the _text_<\df> was not the issue. Certain copyFields
had to be changed from dest="text" to dest="_text_".
this issue is closed. thank you
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
On 5/17/2018 7:23 AM, THADC wrote:
, however for 7.3, "defaultSearchField" apparently no longer a valid type. I
switched to "df". Also, "text" is no longer default data type, but rather
"_text_". So, I replaced above with:
_text_
, but still default search not working properly. By the way, when
Hello,
Migrating our system from solr 4.7 to 7.3. Simple default searches are not
working. For our simply searches, we had the following in our schema.xml for
4.7:
text
, however for 7.3, "defaultSearchField" apparently no longer a valid type. I
switched to "df". Also, "text" is no longer defau
Here is the reference I've found so far.
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 12:26 PM, prateek.agar...@bigbasket.com <
prateek.agar...@bigbasket.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Mikhail,
>
> > You can either sort by function that needs to turn the logic into value
> > source parser.
>
> But like my requirement for this wa
To me, one of the more frustrating things I've encountered in Solr is
working with date fields. Supposedly, according to the documentation,
this is straightforward. But in my experience, it is anything but
that. In particular, I've found that the abbreviated forms of date
queries, don't work as
I strongly advise downloading the full Solr reference guide, searching
there first often gets you answers quickly, in this case
At the top of every on-line version, there's an "other formats" link
that has an "archived PDFs" link that will take you to a page that
allows you to download the version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Shawn,
On 5/17/18 4:23 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 5/17/2018 1:53 AM, Anchal Sharma2 wrote:
>> We are using solr version 5.3.0 and have been trying to enable
>> security on our solr .We followed steps mentioned on site
>> -https://lucene.apache
Hi Mikhail,
> You can either sort by function that needs to turn the logic into value
> source parser.
But like my requirement for this was to add a field dynamically from cache or
external source to the returned documents from the solr and perform sorting in
the solr itself if required otherw
Here is some basic question based on that answers vary.
1) Are you going to use UUID column as unique column.
2) what do you with that column.
Process :-
Column is :-
For Add this :-
And then need to add in uniqueid section.
id
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 5:00 PM, msaunier wrote:
> Hell
Hello,
On solrCloud interface, I don't have with solr4j the info and debug level on
the console. In < level > I have add my URP with INFO param and DEBUG param
but never of the two work. I have just WARN and ERROR log on the interface.
Have an idea ?
Thanks you,
Hello,
I use SolrCloud 7.0 and I don't have find how to add an UID field on the
schema. I have add UUIDField type and add a field but it do not work.
{
"name": "uid",
"class": "solr.UUIDField",
"indexed": true,
"stored": true
},
Thanks for your help.
On 5/17/2018 1:53 AM, Anchal Sharma2 wrote:
We are using solr version 5.3.0 and have been trying to enable security on
our solr .We followed steps mentioned on site
-https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/enabling-ssl.html .But by default it
picks ,TLS version 1.0,which is causing an issu
Hi All,
We are using solr version 5.3.0 and have been trying to enable security on
our solr .We followed steps mentioned on site
-https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/enabling-ssl.html .But by default it
picks ,TLS version 1.0,which is causing an issue as our application uses TLSv
1.2.
Prateek,
It's too late to sort on transformer result.
You can either sort by function that needs to turn the logic into value
source parser.
If you need to toss just result page, check rerank.
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 10:03 AM, prateek.agar...@bigbasket.com <
prateek.agar...@bigbasket.com> wrote:
Hi all,
I wanted to ask is it possible to sort on the field which is added during
DocTransformer.
I'm referring to something like this:
(https://mariofebbraio.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/doctransformer.png) here the
price is added using doctransformer so is it possible to sort on this field if
28 matches
Mail list logo
