On 3/23/2018 10:32 PM, Susheel Kumar wrote:
I did schema update to Solr cloud of Source CDCR cluster and same on
target. After Collection Reload, noticed "error opening searcher" /
IndexWriter closed etc. on leader node while all replica's went into
recovery mode.
Later after restarting Solr on
Hello,
I did schema update to Solr cloud of Source CDCR cluster and same on
target. After Collection Reload, noticed "error opening searcher" /
IndexWriter closed etc. on leader node while all replica's went into
recovery mode.
Later after restarting Solr on Leader noticed below too many file ope
On 3/23/2018 4:08 AM, Hendrik Haddorp wrote:
I did not define a /get request handler but I also don't see one being
default in the solrconfig.xml files that come with Solr 7.2.1. Do I
need to add that as described in
https://www.garysieling.com/blog/fixing-solrj-error-expected-mime-type-applica
On 3/23/2018 1:13 PM, Deepak Goel wrote:
> Yes I am now creating a client object only once. On Linux it has superb
> results (performance improves by around two times). However on Windows it
> has no improvement
>
> *SoftwareThroughput (/sec)Response Time (msec)Utilization (%CPU)UnTuned
> (Windows)
I'll try it out.
Thanks
Abhi
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 6:22 PM Rick Leir wrote:
> Abhi
> Check your lib directives.
>
> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/lib-directives-in-solrconfig.html#lib-directives-in-solrconfig
>
> I suspect your jars are not in a lib dir mentioned in solrconfig.xml
>
Deep,
What is the test so I can try it.
75 or 90 ms .. is that the JVM startup time?
Cheers -- Rick
>>
>>
>I have stated the numbers which I found during my test. The best way to
>verify them is for someone else to run the same test. Otherwise I don't
>see
>how we can verify the results
--
S
On 3/23/2018 3:47 PM, Webster Homer wrote:
> Just FYI I had a project recently where I tried to use cursorMark in
> Solrcloud and solr 7.2.0 and it was very unreliable. It couldn't even
> return consistent numberFound values. I posted about it in this forum.
> Using the start and rows arguments in
Thanks David. Is there a reason we wouldn't want to base the Solr
implementation on the InetAddressPoint class?
https://lucene.apache.org/core/7_2_1/misc/org/apache/lucene/document/InetAddressPoint.html
I realize that is in the "misc" package for now, so it's not part of core
Lucene. But it is
On 3/23/2018 11:31 AM, Deepak Goel wrote:
> Do you have any specific questions about the benchmark setup?
How many docs are in the Solr index? How much disk space does it
consume? How much total memory is in the machine? How much memory is
allocated to Java heaps? Is there any other software r
On 3/23/2018 3:24 PM, Webster Homer wrote:
> I see this in the output:
> Lexical error at line 1, column 1759. Encountered: after :
> "/select?defType=edismax&start=0&rows=25&...
> It has basically the entire solr query which it obviously couldn't parse.
>
> solrQuery = new SolrQuery(log.getQuery
Abhi
Check your lib directives.
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/lib-directives-in-solrconfig.html#lib-directives-in-solrconfig
I suspect your jars are not in a lib dir mentioned in solrconfig.xml
Cheers -- Rick
On March 23, 2018 11:12:17 AM EDT, Abhi Basu <9000r...@gmail.com> wrote:
>MS
Just FYI I had a project recently where I tried to use cursorMark in
Solrcloud and solr 7.2.0 and it was very unreliable. It couldn't even
return consistent numberFound values. I posted about it in this forum.
Using the start and rows arguments in SolrQuery did work reliably so I
abandoned cursorMa
I am working on a program to play back queries from a log file. It seemed
straight forward. The log has the solr query written to it. via the
SolrQuery.toString method. The SolrQuery class has a constructor which
takes a string. It does instantiate a SolrQuery object, however when I try
to actuall
Hi,
For IPv4, use TrieIntField with precisionStep=8
For IPv6 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6741 There's nothing
there yet; you could help out if you are familiar with the codebase. Or
you might try something relatively simple involving edge ngrams.
~ David
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 a
Arturas:
Try to field-qualify your hl.q parameter. That looks like:
hl.q=trans:Kundigung
or
hl.q=trans:Kündigung
I saw the exact behavior you describe when I did _not_ specify the
field in the hl.q parameter, i.e.
hl.q=Kundigung
or
hl.q=Kündigung
didn't show all highlights.
But when I did spe
Deepak
"Please stop cruelty to Animals, help by becoming a Vegan"
+91 73500 12833
deic...@gmail.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deicool
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/deicool
"Plant a Tree, Go Green"
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:38 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 3/23/2018 11:21 AM, Deepak Go
Hi Erick,
Thanks for the update and the infos. Your post brought quite a bit of light
into the picture and now I understand quite a bit more about what you are
saying. Your explanation makes sense and can be quite useful in certain
scenarious.
What stroke me from your description is that you are
On 3/23/2018 11:21 AM, Deepak Goel wrote:
>> I tried the above suggestion. The throughput and utilisation remain the
>> same (they dont increase even if I increase the load). The response time
>> comes down.
>>
Are you still creating a new client object for every query? Changing
how the client ob
On 3/23/2018 10:28 AM, Алексей Пономаренко wrote:
> Hi, I have issues to integrate OpenNLP to Solr.
>
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49433989/can-not-apply-patch-lucene-2899-patch-to-solr-on-windows
> here is a link to SO that describes problem.
>
> Can you help me?
That SO question has an
Hi Erick,
I am ok with getting differences because lucene uses different similarity
algorithm in qf that in the new version may be better.
The problem I am reporting is with the bf behavior. Since queryNorm varies from
query to query I have not found a way to have consistent boost results betwee
Deepak
"Please stop cruelty to Animals, help by becoming a Vegan"
+91 73500 12833
deic...@gmail.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deicool
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/deicool
"Plant a Tree, Go Green"
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 3:32 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 3/16/2018 4:24 PM, Deepak Goel
Thanks for responding. My responses are inline.
> On Mar 23, 2018, at 8:16 AM, Amrit Sarkar wrote:
>
> Hey Tom,
>
> I'm also having issue with replicas in the target data center. It will go
>> from recovering to down. And when one of my replicas go to down in the
>> target data center, CDCR wil
Deepak
"Please stop cruelty to Animals, help by becoming a Vegan"
+91 73500 12833
deic...@gmail.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deicool
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/deicool
"Plant a Tree, Go Green"
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 1:25 AM, Deepak Goel wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Deepak
> "Please stop crue
bq: this is not a typical case that one searches for a keyword but
highlights something else
This isn't really an unusual case, apparently I mislead you.
What I was trying to convey is that the analysis chain used is firmly
attached to a particular _field_. There's no way to say "use one
analysis
I would not focus at all on getting the same ordering. There are
ongoing improvements and changes, for instance:
LUCENE-7368: Removed query normalization
Instead, I'd focus on the question "is the ranking I'm seeing in 7.x
better or worse than 5.4 and tune until you could
say "yes"...
Best,
Erick
Hi, I have issues to integrate OpenNLP to Solr.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49433989/can-not-apply-patch-lucene-2899-patch-to-solr-on-windows
here is a link to SO that describes problem.
Can you help me?
It's been a while since I had time to look further into this. I'll have to
go back through logs, which I need to get retrieved by an admin.
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 8:45 AM, Amrit Sarkar
wrote:
> Elaino,
>
> When you say commits not working, the solr logs not printing "commit"
> messages? or docu
Hi,
I am working on the migration of SOLR 5.4 to 7.1 and I have not been able to
get the same order in the results. Looks like the problem is with the bf
parameter.
We use edismax with both boost and bf functions. It is important to have some
functions as bf so they add to the score and the imp
MS Azure does not support Solr 4.9 on HDI, so I am posting here. I would
like to write index collection data to HDFS (hosted on ADL).
Note: I am able to get to ADL from hadoop fs command like, so hadoop is
configured correctly to get to ADL:
hadoop fs -ls adl://
This is what I have done so far:
1
Elaino,
When you say commits not working, the solr logs not printing "commit"
messages? or documents are not appearing when we search.
Amrit Sarkar
Search Engineer
Lucidworks, Inc.
415-589-9269
www.lucidworks.com
Twitter http://twitter.com/lucidworks
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sarkaram
Yea, Amrit. to clarify we have 30 sec soft commit on target data center
and for the test when we use Documents tab, the default Commit Within=1000
ms which makes the commit quickly on source and then we just wait for it to
appear on target data center per commit strategy.
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at
Susheel,
That is the correct behavior, "commit" operation is not propagated to
target and the documents will be visible in the target as per commit
strategy devised there.
Amrit Sarkar
Search Engineer
Lucidworks, Inc.
415-589-9269
www.lucidworks.com
Twitter http://twitter.com/lucidworks
LinkedIn:
Just a simple check, if you go to source solr and index single document
from Documents tab, then keep querying target solr for the same document.
How long does it take the document to appear in target data center. In our
case, I can see document show up in target within 30 sec which is our soft
co
Hey Tom,
I'm also having issue with replicas in the target data center. It will go
> from recovering to down. And when one of my replicas go to down in the
> target data center, CDCR will no longer send updates from the source to
> the target.
Are you able to figure out the issue? As long as the
Hi Mathesis (Stefan),
Thanks for the questions. This made me look at the problem from a distance
and re-frame the situation. Good questions indeed.
Trying to go around: consider a user who describes herself as being a BMW
fan, being convinced that all BMW need to be the blackest color possible
(f
Perhaps we try it the other way round .. what's your use case for this? I'm
trying to think of a situation where I'd need this a as user?
The only reason I see myself doing this is CTRL+F in a page when the search
result is not immediately visible for me ;)
On Mar 23, 2018 9:41 AM, "Arturas Maze
Hi,
I have a Solr Cloud 7.2.1 setup and used SolrJ (7.2.1) to create 1000
collections with a few documents. During that I got multiple times in
the Solr logs exceptions because an access of the /get handler of a
collection failed. The call stack looks like this:
at
org.apache.solr.client.
Hi Erick et al,
>From your answer I understand that this is not a typical case that one
searches for a keyword but highlights something else. Since we have two
parameters (q vs hl.q) I thought they are freely combinable. From your
answer I understand that this is not really the case. My current
un
38 matches
Mail list logo
