Hi,
This is the Aggregation Functions in Solr Facet Functions, which I
understand that it only works in numeric field. But if the field is already
indexed in string/text, is it possible for the field to be mapped to
integer/float without re-indexing?
Regards,
Edwin
On 18 February 2018 at 09:20,
In real-time get, the parameter name is “id”, regardless of the name of the
unique key.
The request should be in your case:
http://:8080/api/collections/col1/get?id=69749398
See: https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_2/realtime-get.html
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 18, 2018, at 9:28 PM, Gan
I tried this real time get on my collection using the both V1 and V2 URL
for real time get, but did not work!!!
http://:8080/api/collections/col1/get?myid:69749398
it returned...
{
"doc":null}
same issue with V1 URL as well, http://
:8080/solr/col1/get?myid:69749398
however if i do q=myid:69
I think real-time get should be directed to the correct shard. Try:
[COLLECTION]/get?id=[YOUR_ID]
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 18, 2018, at 3:17 PM, Ganesh Sethuraman
> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I am using Solr 7.2.1. I have 8 shards in two nodes (two different m/c)
> using Solr Cloud. The data was
I forgot to mention, in order to do a join you would merge the streams
together that you wanted to join. Then reduce by the join key.
This is basic structure:
reduce(merge(search(), search()))
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 10:45 PM, Joel Bernstein wrote:
If you aren't getting the join functionality you want with the current join
implementations you could try the reduce function using the group
operation.
Here is the sample syntax:
reduce(search(collection1, q=*:*, fl="id,a_s,a_i,a_f", sort="a_s asc, a_f asc"),
by="a_s",
group(sort="
Hi Erick & Alessandro,
I have solved my problem by re-ordering the data in the SQL query. I don't
know why it works but it does. I can consistently re-produce the problem
without changing anything else except the database table. As our Solr build is
scripted and we always build a new Solr s
Hi Andreas,
Can weak AND (WAND) be used in your use case?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8135
Ahmet
On Monday, February 12, 2018, 1:44:38 PM GMT+3, Moll, Dr. Andreas
wrote:
Hi,
I try to upgrade our SolR installation from SolR 5 to 7.
We use a customized similarity clas
Hi Aakanksha,
We use the following for geo queries which works for us:
/solr/core/select?defType=edismax&indent=on&ps=0&start=0&wt=json&sow=true&hl=on&hl.fl=*&fq=%7B!geofilt%7D&pt=-6.08165,145.8612430&d=10&sfield=geoLocation&sort=geodist()%20asc&rows=10&fl=*,score,distance:geodist()
This gives u
Any help solr streaming expression option is greatly appreciated. Please help
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Hi
I am using Solr 7.2.1. I have 8 shards in two nodes (two different m/c)
using Solr Cloud. The data was indexed with a unique key (default composite
id) using the CSV update handler (batch indexing). Note that I do NOT have
while indexing. Then when I try to query the
collection col1 based o
That error is not from the PDF parsing, it's from using the _default
(schemaless) schema. As the startup message says, schemaless mode is
not recommended for production because it's impossible to guess right
every time.
So I'd start with a schema that does not do this, see the reference
guide sect
Hi all,
I'm a newbie to Solr. I'm trying to use it for GeoSpatial Search and I'm
facing an issue while using it. I've tried using the new 'location' field
type() as well as the deprecated solr.LatLonType fieldtype,
but I always get the error:
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: The field latlong
I want to write a custom Solr query and sorting and when I am calling
http://127.0.0.1:8983/solr/techproducts/select?q={!myparsername}12&sort=uid
desc, some of the section as marked is not getting called.
Issue: Documentation of solr customization is pretty poor
Help: Can you please tell why my c
On 2/17/2018 9:27 PM, GVK Prasad wrote:
My assumption was hosting on Jetty may not work for production and higher
performance systems needs and we have to go for Servers like Tomcat. If it is
not supported with latest version not sure how it will help us. Thanks for
clarification.
It is pro
15 matches
Mail list logo