When both solr4 and solr6 have concurrent hits:
1. 30 to 40 :
Avg response time 470ms vs 380ms
Load 6 vs 10
1. 80 to 90 :
Avg response time 500ms vs 620ms (solr6 performing bad on peak hours)
Load 11 vs 25
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.c
Thank you both for your very detailed answers.
This is great to know. I knew that SolrJ had the cluster aware knowledge
(via zookeeper), but I was wondering what something like curl would do.
Great to know that internally the cluster will proxy queries to the
appropriate place regardless.
I am ru
On the last question:
For Writes: Yes. Writes are going to be sent to the shard leader, and since
PULL replicas can’t be leaders, it’s going to be a TLOG replica. If you are
using CloudSolrClient, then this routing will be done directly from the client
(since it will send the update to the lead
Talking a little out of my depth here as I haven't ben in that code,
so if there are corrections they're welcome.
In general, there's nothing special between TLOG and PULL replicas in
terms of query routing. For
that matter, nothing special about either of these .vs. NRT replicas
for _queries_.
S
Hi
I have a question around how queries are routed and load-balanced in a
cluster of mixed TLOG and PULL replicas.
I thought that I might have to put a load-balancer in front of the PULL
replicas and direct queries at them manually as nodes are added and removed
as PULL replicas. However, it seem
> https://github.com/mohsinbeg/datadump/tree/master/solr58f449cec94a2c75_core_256
I had uploaded the output at the above link.
The OS has no swap configured. There are other processes on the host but
<1GB or <5% CPU cumulatively but none inside the docker as `top` shows. Solr
JVM heap is at 30GB
Thanks for the quick response.
I tried the following and it works.
1. Take a snapshot of your index :
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/collections?action=CREATESNAPSHOT&collection=
&commitName=backup1
2. Add a few documents.
3. List the files for the snapshot :
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/co
Also can you please post the throughputs for both of your tests
On 12 Feb 2018 00:35, "Deepak Goel" wrote:
> Yup. Improvement of response time would hurt the cpu usage. The other
> thing is more memory usage (cache) which gets included into the cpu usage.
>
>
>
> Deepak
> "Please stop cruelty to
Yup. Improvement of response time would hurt the cpu usage. The other thing
is more memory usage (cache) which gets included into the cpu usage.
Deepak
"Please stop cruelty to Animals, help by becoming a Vegan"
+91 73500 12833
deic...@gmail.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deicool
LinkedI
I have upgraded Solr4.0 Beta to Solr6.6. The Cache results look Awesome but
overall the CPU load on solr6.6 is double the load on solr4.0 and hence I
am not able to roll solr6.6 to 100% of my traffic.
*Some Key Stats In Performance of Sol6 Vs Solr4*
Document cache usage increased from .98 from .14
Other resource is not using the cpu.
Its true that response is better to 300ms from 350ms but cpu usage almost
doubled?
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Two things trouble me:
1. It is a shared resource, so results are unreliable
2. Since cache results have increased, memory access will increase and it
will result in an increase in cpu usage. However response times will also
improve
To support more load you will have to increase server capacity
Config : 64GB RAM 32 CORE CPU
but i have given 20Gb to solr JVM.. Also its a shared resource
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
On 2/10/2018 11:58 PM, mmb1234 wrote:
Only `top` available on Photon OS is
https://github.com/vmware/photon/blob/1.0/SPECS/procps-ng/procps-ng.spec.
Those screenshots are attached.
Attachments rarely make it to the mailing list. I don't see any
attachments.
This is an example of what I am l
Can you please give the configuration of your server?
On 11 Feb 2018 19:17, "~$alpha`" wrote:
> I have upgraded Solr4.0 Beta to Solr6.6. The Cache results look Awesome but
> overall the CPU load on solr6.6 is double the load on solr4.0 and hence I
> am
> not able to roll solr6.6 to 100% of my tr
Steve,
According to your comment, I made this test :
1/ put the SynonymGraphFilterFactory after the StopFilterFactory in query
time analyze chain
2/ remove the stop word in the synonyms file
om, olympique marseille
The parsed query s
I have upgraded Solr4.0 Beta to Solr6.6. The Cache results look Awesome but
overall the CPU load on solr6.6 is double the load on solr4.0 and hence I am
not able to roll solr6.6 to 100% of my traffic.
*Some Key Stats In Performance of Sol6 Vs Solr4*
Document cache usage increased from .98 from .14
Hi Steve,
Thank you for your response.
The Jira was created : SOLR-11968
I let you add your comments.
Regards.
Dominique
Le sam. 10 févr. 2018 à 20:30, Steve Rowe a écrit :
> Hi Dominique,
>
> Looks like it’s a bug, not sure where exactly though. Can you please
> create a JIRA?
>
> I can s
18 matches
Mail list logo
