As Chris explained, this is special:
q=*:*
in terms of scoring or anything of the like. It's just match-all-docs
It makes no sense to distribute *:* among "pf" fields. The whole point
of pf is to influence scoring by providing a mechanism for boosting
when words in some field(s) appear together fo
Thanks everyone, that was a very informative thread.
One more curiosity: why are different set of fields being used based on the
query string:-
http://localhost:8983/solr/filesearch/select?fq=id:1193&;
q=*:*&debugQuery=true
- parsedquery: "+DisjunctionMaxQuery((user_email:*:* | user_name:*:
: Yes, i am using dismax. But dismax allows *:* for q.alt ,which also seems
: like inconsistency.
dismax is a *parser* that affects how a single query string is parsed.
when you use defType=dismax, that only changes how the "q" param is
parsed -- not any other query string params, like "fq" or
On 1/6/2018 11:25 AM, SANJAY. wrote:
Please let me know how to achieve group by in solr could env.
We tried grouping in solr cloud shard replicas to fetch unique search result
from solr for custom field we .
we are getting exception saying unexpected docvalues type "SORTED_SET
(expected SORTED)"
Hi,
Please let me know how to achieve group by in solr could env.
We tried grouping in solr cloud shard replicas to fetch unique search result
from solr for custom field we .
we are getting exception saying unexpected docvalues type "SORTED_SET
(expected SORTED)"
We are using solr cloud and coll
Don't we need vectors of the same size to calculate the cosine similarity?
Maybe I missed something, but following that example it looks like i have to
manually recreate the sparse vectors, because the term vector of a document
should (i may be wrong) contain only the terms that appear in that doc
On 1/5/2018 7:22 PM, Nawab Zada Asad Iqbal wrote:
Yes, i am using dismax. But dismax allows *:* for q.alt ,which also seems
like inconsistency.
It works in q.alt because q.alt is interpreted using the standard
(lucene) query parser.
The dismax parser doesn't understand lucene syntax like *:*
On 1/5/2018 6:26 PM, Rick Leir wrote:
Erik, Sorry I didn't mean to say Velocity has a security problem. I am just
thinking that people will see it in action and think it is a full answer to a
front end web app, though it has no input filtering or range checking ( as an
output template system,
Thank Erick. Your thoughts are correct and solved the problem. I appreciate
you looking at my problem and sorry for the late reply.
Of course, providing enough data, evidence that I've tried to solve it and
easy to understand problem structure are very important in order to
encourage others and m
Maybe I misunderstood the question, but why you need to create the
full size vectors? can't you just compute the cosine using the sparse
vectors?
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 10:09 PM, marco wrote:
> At the moment I have another problem: is there an efficient way to calculate
> the cosine similarity be
10 matches
Mail list logo