Vincenzo,
This is a discussion for the wikipedia 'talk' page. My sense is that
information must be verifiable, and that the popularity rating at db-engines is
not transparent. Would you like to start the discussion? Cheers -- Rick
On August 30, 2017 5:17:25 PM MDT, Vincenzo D'Amore wrote:
>Hi
Ashish,
Fast search depends on indexing the data. If it is not indexed, then the search
becomes a full table scan which is much slower. Cheers -- Rick
On August 29, 2017 11:57:44 AM MDT, AshB wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Thanks ,got this issue is happening because of docValues=true.
>
>Please elaborate on "fu
Susheel, Just a guess, but carrot2.org might be useful. But it might be
overkill. Cheers -- Rick
On August 30, 2017 7:40:08 AM MDT, Susheel Kumar wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I am looking for different ideas/suggestions to solve the use case am
>working on.
>
>We have couple of fields in schema along with
Hi ,
I am using Apache Solr with Cassandra Database. In my table, I have 20
rows. Due to some changes, I changed my Solr schema and Reindex schema with
below option as
*reindex=true and deleteAll=false*
After Reindexing my Solr Schema, I am not able to do reindex my old data
which are present in
I question the accuracy of that "Second most popular" on a couple of fronts:
Maybe it's the most popular! -- I speak at Elasticsearch meetups. It's 90%
logs logs logs, with some search thrown in. Solr meetups have a tremendous
amount of information retrieval. Giving a information retrieval talk at
Hi,
I think there are many things to consider besides the 'normal' search you
did:
- First of all, Google search results vary. The search algorithm of google
changes all the time.
- Many different elements determine 'what' google scores as top docs in
search results, among them:
- The device you
Hi All,
googling for "what is Solr" I found this as *first* sentence:
"Solr is the second-most popular enterprise search engine after
Elasticsearch. ... "
The description comes from wikipedia https://en.
wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Solr
Now, well, I'm a little upset, because I think this is a mis
Hello,
Occasionally we are seeing errors opening new searcher for certain solr
cores. Whenever this happens, we are unable to query or ingest new data
into these cores. It seems to clear up after some time though. The root
cause seems to be - *"org.apache.lucene.store.LockObtainFailedException:
Lo
Hello,
I'm trying to use the knn classifier by following this link:
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrClassification
I use this config :
classification
and
Title,Body
Tags
Tags
knn
2
P.S. Perhaps the defaults changed when you upgraded for some reason?
Erick
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> This usually means you changed multiValued from true to false or vice
> versa then added more docs.
>
> So since each segment is its own "mini index", different se
Hi,
Apart from take a look at the Solr's wiki, I think one of the main reasons
why these API's are all out dated is that Solr itself provides the 'API' to
many different languages in the form of output formats.
Maybe you know that the main protocol used in Solr for communication with
its clients i
This usually means you changed multiValued from true to false or vice
versa then added more docs.
So since each segment is its own "mini index", different segments have
different expectations and when you query this error is thrown.
Most of the time when you change a field's type in the schema yo
We do have a page on the Wiki with a lot of that information.
Did you see it?
Regards,
Alex
On 29 Aug. 2017 2:28 am, "Aditya" wrote:
Hi
I am aggregating open source solr client libraries across all languages.
Below are the links. Very few projects are currently active. Most of them
are l
1) As regards naming of the shards: Is using the same naming for the shards
o.k. in this constellation? I.e. does it create trouble to have e.g.
"Shard001", "Shard002", etc. in collection1 and "Shard001", "Shard002",
etc. as well in collection2?
>> The default naming convention for shards would be
After I tried an update from Solr 6.5.0 to Solr 6.6.0 (SolrCloud mode), I
receive in one collection the following error:
"Cannot change DocValues type from SORTED_SET to SORTED for field
"index_todelete".
I had a look on the index values (if set all are true or not filled,
checked via facetin
After I tried an update from Solr 6.5.0 to Solr 6.6.0 (SolrCloud mode), I
receive in one collection the following error:
"Cannot change DocValues type from SORTED_SET to SORTED for field
"index_todelete".
I had a look on the index values (if set all are true or not filled,
checked via facetin
The thing everyone should be aware of is that those strings you see
aren't just strange styles, they are actually lost code blocks - many
of the code examples throughout the old Ref Guide are now missing
(some, for some reason, aren't affected). IOW, if you use the old Ref
Guide, you will be missin
Think about making a denormalized view, with all the fields needed in one
table. That view gets sent to Solr. Each row is a Solr document.
It could be implemented as a view or as SQL, but that is a useful mental model
for people starting from a relational background.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun
Thank you, Susheel, for the quick response.
So, that means that when I create a new collection, it shards will be newly
created at each node, right?
Thus, if I have two collections with
numShards=38,
maxShardsPerNode=2 and
replicationFactor=2
on my 38 nodes, then this would result in each nod
Hi,We have one node zookeeper and one no solr. Sometimes when trying to create
or delete collection there is "SEVERE:
null:org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: delete the collection time out:180s"
error.
After checking the code I found that solr puts a task node to zookeeperÂ
/overseer/collecti
First, it's often best, by far, to denormalize the data in your solr index,
that's what I'd explore first.
If you can't do that, the join query parser might work for you.
On Aug 30, 2017 4:49 AM, "Renuka Srishti"
wrote:
> Thanks Susheel for your response.
> Here is the scenario about which I am
This has happened to several projects, so it's something
infrastructure related not specific to Solr's CWiki. We've raised a
ticket for infra to see fi they can find the root cause.
Cassandra and Hoss are trying to address the whole
CWiki-no-longer-current issue.
BTW, I find it useful to download
Yes, absolutely. You can create as many as collections you need (like you
would create table in relational world).
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Johannes Knaus wrote:
> I have a working SolrCloud-Setup with 38 nodes with a collection spanning
> over these nodes with 2 shards per node and re
Now the documentation is being updated at
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/index.html
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Bernd Fehling <
bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
> Can someone fix https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/ ?
>
> Seams to have problems with styles?
>
> Tons of #
Thanks, sorry I missed the issue in JIRA.
I think the second issue still stands and is unrelated - it's only
related in the sense that it affects the same file.
2) only on SLES 12.2 (and Leap 42.2) and possibly future versions:
related to the following change:
https://www.suse.com/releasenot
I have a working SolrCloud-Setup with 38 nodes with a collection spanning over
these nodes with 2 shards per node and replication factor 2 and a router field.
Now I got some new data for indexing which has the same structure and size as
my existing index in the described collection.
However, alt
Can someone fix https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/ ?
Seams to have problems with styles?
Tons of #66solid and #66nonesolid in the text.
E.g. :
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Getting+Started+with+SolrCloud
Thanks, Bernd
I had this opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10932 earlier
and discussion link
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/install-solr-service-possible-bug-td4340502.html
We shall put a fix for this as Shawn suggested.
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Adrian H wrote:
> hi all
>
> I'
Did you get an answer? Would really be nice to have that in the next
release.
On 28.08.2017 18:31, Erick Erickson wrote:
Varun Thacker is the RM for Solr 6.6.1, I've pinged him about including it.
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Walter Underwood wrote:
That would be a really good reason for
Hello,
I am looking for different ideas/suggestions to solve the use case am
working on.
We have couple of fields in schema along with id, business_email and
personal_email. We need to return all records based on unique business and
personal email's.
The criteria for unique records is either of
hi all
I've installed Solr 6.6.0 (and older versions) on a couple of SUSE
servers and ran into the following issues with the service installer script:
1) on both SLES 12.1 and 12.2:
line 196: service --version &>/dev/null || print_error "Script requires
the 'service' command"
service --ver
Not sure how you are doing indexing. Try adding clean=false in your indexing
command/script when you do second table indexing.
> On 30 Aug 2017, at 7:06 PM, Agrawal, Harshal (GE Digital)
> wrote:
>
> Hello Guys,
>
> I have installed solr in my local system and was able to connect to Terad
Hello Guys,
I have installed solr in my local system and was able to connect to Teradata
successfully.
For single table I am able to index the data and query it also but when I am
trying for multiple tables in the same schema and doing indexing one by one
respectively.
I can see datasets gettin
Thanks Susheel for your response.
Here is the scenario about which I am talking:
- Let suppose there are two documents doc1 and doc2.
- I want to fetch the data from doc2 on the basis of doc1 fields which
are related to doc2.
How to achieve this efficiently.
Thanks,
Renuka Srishti
O
Hi,
Maybe this can help:
http://lucene.apache.org/pylucene/
Regards.
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 2:44 AM, ron visbord wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm rebuilding the Solr part of my search engine in Python.
>
> I work with both Solr 5[.2.1] and 6[.3.0].
>
> I looked around but found no satisfactory python
Hi
I'm using solr for geospatial query.
I need to obtain the nearest linestring to my point, I'm using the query
below but I need results ordered by distance.
http://localhost:8983/solr/address_search/select?d=0.1&fq={!geofilt%20sfield=geometry}&indent=on&pt=43.916938,12.912577&q=*:*&rows=10&sfie
36 matches
Mail list logo
