You can add a ~3 to the query to allow the order to be reversed, but you
will get extra hits. Maybe it is a ~4, i can never remember on phrases and
reversals. I usually just try it.
Alternatively, you can create a custom query field for what you need from
dates. For example, if you want to sear
Luca
Walter has got the best word on this, you should use SQL for sorting (maybe
mySQL or Postgres). If you also need searching, you can create a Solr index by
ingesting from the SQL database. The Solr index would be just used for
searching. Cheers -- Rick
--
Sorry for being brief. Alternate em
Thank you for the detailed response Shawn! I've read it several times.
Yes, that particular machine has 12 cores that are hyper-threaded. Does
Solr do something special when not running in HDFS to allocate memory
that would result in VIRT showing memory required for index data size?
In my e
On 8/18/2017 1:05 PM, Joe Obernberger wrote:
> Thank you Shawn. Please see:
> http://www.lovehorsepower.com/Vesta
> for screen shots of top
> (http://www.lovehorsepower.com/Vesta/VestaSolr6.6.0_top.jpg) and
> several screen shots over various times of jvisualvm.
>
> There is also the GC log and th
Ah! Yes - that makes much more sense:
CPU: http://www.lovehorsepower.com/Vesta/VestaSolr6.6.0_CPU.jpg
Mem: http://www.lovehorsepower.com/Vesta/VestaSolr6.6.0_Mem.jpg
-Joe
On 8/18/2017 3:35 PM, Michael Braun wrote:
When I recommended JVisualVM, specifically the "Sampling" portion of
the app -
Hi Walter - I see what you are saying, but the machine is not actively
swapping (that would be the concern - right?) It's the CPU usage that
I'm trying to figure out. Htop reports that there is about 20G of disk
cache in use, and about 76G of RAM in use by programs. VIRT memory is
what was re
I see a server with 100Gb of memory and processes (java and jsvc) using 203Gb
of virtual memory. Hmm.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Aug 18, 2017, at 12:05 PM, Joe Obernberger
> wrote:
>
> Thank you Shawn. Please see:
> http://w
Thank you Shawn. Please see:
http://www.lovehorsepower.com/Vesta
for screen shots of top
(http://www.lovehorsepower.com/Vesta/VestaSolr6.6.0_top.jpg) and several
screen shots over various times of jvisualvm.
There is also the GC log and the regular solr.log for one server (named
Vesta). Ple
On 8/18/2017 10:37 AM, Joe Obernberger wrote:
> Indexing about 15 million documents per day across 100 shards on 45
> servers. Up until about 350 million documents, each of the solr
> instances was taking up about 1 core (100% CPU). Recently, they all
> jumped to 700%. Is this normal? Anything
What field types are you using for your dates?
Have a look at:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Working+with+Dates
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Nawab Zada Asad Iqbal
wrote:
> Hi Krishna
>
> I haven't used date range queries myself. But if Solr only supports a
> particular da
Actually, part of me is thinking that there are valid use cases for having
fl and hl.fl with different values. e.g, receive name etc. in “clean” form
in fl field and receive both name and address in html formatted form (by
specifying in hl.fl)
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Nawab Zada Asad Iqb
I have an update on this. While I was on vacation, there were a number of
alerts.
Our autoCommit settings were (and are) the following:
${solr.autoCommit.maxTime:60}
false
The startup script was NOT setting solr.autoCommit.maxTime. It seemed that
autoCommits were spora
Actually, i realize that it is an incorrect use on my part to pass only
id+score in fl and specify more fields in the hl.fl fields. This was
somehow supported in older versions but the new behavior is actually a
performance improvement for the scenario when user is asking for only ids.
Nawab
On
I was able to attach to one server by changing the startup and adding:
|-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote \
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.local.only=false \
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.ssl=false \
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.authenticate=false \
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=18983 \
Thank you Michael. Oddly when I start jstatd on one of the servers, I
see all the JVM processes in jvisualvm except the solr one! Any idea why?
On 8/18/2017 12:43 PM, Michael Braun wrote:
Have you attached JVisualVM or a similar application to the process to
sample where the time is being sp
Have you attached JVisualVM or a similar application to the process to
sample where the time is being spent? It can be very helpful for debugging
this sort of problem.
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Joe Obernberger <
joseph.obernber...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Indexing about 15 million documents pe
Indexing about 15 million documents per day across 100 shards on 45
servers. Up until about 350 million documents, each of the solr
instances was taking up about 1 core (100% CPU). Recently, they all
jumped to 700%. Is this normal? Anything that I can check for?
I don't see anything unusua
Thanks Erick for the pointing to better option. I will explore that. After
your email, I found that if i have specified 'fl=*' in the query then it is
doing the right thing (a 2 pass process). However, my queries had
'fl=id+score' (or sometimes fl=id&fl=score), in both of these cases I found
that t
I don't think you're reading it correctly. First of all, if you're
going to do be doing deep paging you should be using cusorMark, see:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Pagination+of+Results.
Second, it's a two-pass process if you don't use cursormark. The first
pass gets the candi
Solr does not implement pure boolean logic, see:
https://lucidworks.com/2011/12/28/why-not-and-or-and-not/
As for your particular query, parenthesize, something like:
name AND (dimension1 or dimension1x2 or dimenstion 1x2x3)
Best,
Erick
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 2:12 AM, jesseqper wrote:
> In my
Why do you want to do this in Solr? This would be pretty easy in SQL. If you
want to sort, use a relational database.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Aug 18, 2017, at 2:52 AM, Luca Dall'Osto
> wrote:
>
> Hello Tom,
> thanks for yo
Hi Erik,
thanks for your reply. I made some deeper investigations to tackle the
reason for the behavior but wasn't successful so far
Answer to your questions:
- yes I completely re-indexed the data
- yes I'm running a collection of around 5.000 queries coming from our
productive logs
Now my
Hi all,
I've run into an issue with solr 6.3.0 where the splitshard command placed
both replicas of the new smaller shard on the same node, and I was curious
as to whether the behavior should be expected or not.
Without having dug into the source code, this is what I've observed
splitshard doing
Hi Erik,
thanks for your reply. I made some deeper investigations to tackle the
reason for the behavior but wasn't successful so far
Answer to your questions:
- yes I completely re-indexed the data
- yes I'm running a collection of around 5.000 queries coming from our
productive logs
Now my
Hey
On Do, 2017-08-17 at 10:15 -0600, John Bickerstaff wrote:
> I'm trying to get Solr logs into AWS Firestream.
>
> Not having a lot of luck.
>
> Does anyone out there have any experience getting Solr logs into an ELK
> stack? Or, better yet, getting Solr Logs into AWS Firestream?
>
> We dire
Hello Tom,
thanks for you reply.
As say in last email, I made the custom function in JS.I posted in pastebin
right now: https://pastebin.com/faXNi0fR
What I have to do is create the same function in Solr... I will take a look to
your link and try to create the custom function.
Thanks
Luca
In my index I have products that have multiple dimensions. I want the user to
be able to search with /name/ + and up to 3 /dimensions/. So a query can
occur like: /ProductX 10x20/, or: /ProductX 10x20x30/. Now I get to many
results back, because matches are like: /name/ AND /dimension/ OR
/dimensi
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Luca Dall'Osto
wrote:
>
> Yes, of course, and excuse me for the misunderstanding.
>
>
> In my scenario I have to display a list with hundreds of documents.
> An user can show this documents in a particular order, this order is decided
> by user in a settings view.
Hello guys,
I am having 5 nodes solr cloud setup with single shard. The solr version
is 5.2.1.
server1 (http://146.XXX.com:4001/solr/contracts_shard1_replica4)is the
leader.
A document with id '43e14a86cbdd422880cac22d9a15d3c0' was not replicated
3 nodes.
Log shows that the "{add=[43e14
Yes, of course, and excuse me for the misunderstanding.
In my scenario I have to display a list with hundreds of documents.
An user can show this documents in a particular order, this order is decided by
user in a settings view.
Order levels are for example:
1) Order by category, as most impo
30 matches
Mail list logo
