MarkLogic can do many-to-many. I worked there six years ago. They use search
engine index structure with generational updates, including segment level
caches. With locking. Pretty good stuff.
A many to many relationship is an intersection across posting lists, with
transactions. Straightforward
Also, id love to see an example of a many to many relationship in a nosql db as
you described, since that's a rdbms concept. If it exists in a nosql
environment I would like to learn how...
> On Aug 4, 2017, at 10:56 PM, Dave wrote:
>
> Uhm. Dude are you drinking?
>
> 1. Lucidworks would neve
Uhm. Dude are you drinking?
1. Lucidworks would never say that.
2. Maria is not a json +MySQL. Maria is a fork of the last open source version
of MySQL before oracle bought them
3.walter is 100% correct. Solr is search. The only complex data structure it
has is an array. Something like mongo c
The people @ Lucidworks would beg to disagree but I know exactly what you
are saying Walter.
A simple flat file like a cardx is fine and dandy as a Solrcloud noSQL DB.
I like to express it as knowing when to fish and when to cut bait. As soon
as you are in the one - many or many - many world a rea
Hi Walter,
You need the metrics with the prefix "QUERY./srp" -- those will give
you request counts and percentiles for the /srp handler for a node.
Comments inline:
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 3:23 AM, Walter Underwood wrote:
> I’m trying to get what I want out of the metrics reporting in Solr. I wa
timeAllowed parameter is a not a good choice for rate limiting and could
crash the whole Solr cluster.
In fact, timeAllowed parameter should increase the chances of crashing the
whole cluster:
When the timeAllowed for a query is over, it's client will get a failure
but the server handling the quer
Solr is NOT a database. If you need a database, don’t choose Solr.
If you need both a database and search, choose MarkLogic.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Aug 4, 2017, at 4:16 PM, Francesco Viscomi wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> why i have
Ones a search engine and the other is a nosql db. They're nothing alike and are
completely different tools for completely different jobs.
> On Aug 4, 2017, at 7:16 PM, Francesco Viscomi wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> why i have to choose solr if mongoDb is easier to learn and to use?
> Both are NoSql
Hi all,
why i have to choose solr if mongoDb is easier to learn and to use?
Both are NoSql database, is there a good reason to chose solr and not
mongoDb?
thanks really much
--
Ing. Viscomi Francesco
Hi Walter,
Can we consider this as a bug/improvement for the /suggest handler which
uses highlighter?
Regards,
Edwin
On 20 July 2017 at 10:14, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo wrote:
> I am getting something similar to yours too, but I'm using Solr 6.5.1.
>
>
> "highlighting":{
> "1":{
> "c
Hi Amrit,
Thanks for your reply.
So does this means that we can consider this as a bug in JSON Facets?
Regards,
Edwin
On 26 July 2017 at 01:57, Amrit Sarkar wrote:
> Zheng,
>
> You may want to check https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7452. I
> don't know whether they are absolutely re
On 8/4/2017 8:59 AM, Sanders, Marshall (CAI - Atlanta) wrote:
> Is there a way to easily set/get a cookie from a solrj request/response or an
> example of this someone can share?
>
> The types of queries our application uses could greatly benefit from
> stickying our application to a specific sol
On 8/2/2017 8:56 AM, Michael B. Klein wrote:
> SCALE DOWN
> 1) Call admin/collections?action=BACKUP for each collection to a
> shared NFS volume
> 2) Shut down all the nodes
>
> SCALE UP
> 1) Spin up 2 Zookeeper nodes and wait for them to stabilize
> 2) Spin up 3 Solr nodes and wait for them to sho
Hi Hrishikesh,
I think SOLR-7344 is probably an important addition to Solr. It could help
users isolate analytical queries ( streaming ) , search queries and
indexing requests and throttle requests
Let's continue the discussion on the Jira
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 2:03 AM, Rick Leir wrote:
>
>
>
Hi all,
I have a question related to Streaming expression. Is it possible to perform
search on top of a merged collection? If it possible how do you write it?
Thank!
Regards,
Minh
The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are intended solely for the use
of
On 8/2/2017 9:17 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Not entirely sure about AWS intricacies, but getting a new replica to
> use a particular index directory in the general case is just
> specifying dataDir=some_directory on the ADDREPLICA command. The index
> just needs an HTTP connection (uses the old re
Hey,
that is a good point. What is the best way for filtering? About the plus at the
request, we are doing on the whole request an URL encode..
Thanks
David
> Am 04.08.2017 um 17:34 schrieb Erick Erickson :
>
> Glad to hear it. Two things:
>
> 1> you might have to do some additional fil
Luca
I hope you have a web app in front of Solr. It could accept parameters from the
browser, then construct the query as necessary to do your sorting. Cheers --
Rick
On August 4, 2017 5:32:31 AM EDT, Luca Dall'Osto
wrote:
>Hello,
>sorry for the late, I was out of my home.
>
>
>In response to
In addition to Shawn's comments, deleted but not merged documents
alter the statistics used for scoring, so the only hope that the
scores are comparable would be on an optimized index. And note that I
would recommend optimizing _only_ for testing, don't use it in a
production system unless the inde
Glad to hear it. Two things:
1> you might have to do some additional filtering when using
WhitespaceTokenizer. It, well, splits on whitespace so things like
punctuation will come through as part of the token. So "My dog has
fleas." (note the period after fleas) would have the period included
in th
Is there a way to easily set/get a cookie from a solrj request/response or an
example of this someone can share?
The types of queries our application uses could greatly benefit from stickying
our application to a specific solr instance and I'd like to read the load
balancer cookie and then send
Hi all,
I recently prototyped a learning to rank system in Python that produced
promising results, so I'm now looking into how to replicate that process in
our Solr setup. For my Python implementation, I was using a number of
features that were per field text comparisons, e.g.:
1. tfidf_case_t
Hey, thanks.
Yeah i found a way..
I sued for these files my on fieldtype. In these I'm using the
WhitespaceTokenizerFactory for query an index.. and now everything is like it
should be..
:-)
Thanks
David
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Shawn Heisey [mailto:apa...@elyograg.org]
Gesen
On 8/4/2017 1:02 AM, SOLR4189 wrote:
> I need to upgrade from SOLR-4.10.3 to SOLR-6.5.1 in production environment.
> When I checked it in the test environment, I noticed the order of returned
> docs for each query is different. The score has changed as well. I use same
> similarity algorithm - O
On 8/4/2017 2:15 AM, d.ku...@technisat.de wrote:
> So how can I prevent e.g. the ST (standartTokenizer) to remove the plus sign?
> An suggestions?
You can't. The standard tokenizer really isn't configurable at all.
You'd need to change your analysis chain (tokenizer and filters) to
produce the
Hello,
sorry for the late, I was out of my home.
In response to Rick:
I can't do that because:
1) each user should have multiple sort (for example user "A" can sort by date
and then by category and then by name ...) .
2) the sort is not natural sort: user has a custom order for a field (for
e
Her Erick,
thanks for reply.
Analysis is a good point I tried "hd+" at the Field Value and you were right:
ST
text hd
raw_bytes [68 64]
start 0
end 2
positionLength 1
type
position 1
So how can I prevent e.g. the ST (standartTokenizer) to remove thepus sign? An
suggestions?
thanks
-
Hey all,
I need to upgrade from SOLR-4.10.3 to SOLR-6.5.1 in production environment.
When I checked it in the test environment, I noticed the order of returned
docs for each query is different. The score has changed as well. I use same
similarity algorithm - OccapiBM25 as in previous version. Numb
28 matches
Mail list logo
