Hi,
I think their is a possible bug in Solrj version 6.6.0 ,as streaming is not
working
as i have a piece of code
public Set getAllIds(String requestId, String field) {
LOG.info("Now Trying to fetch all the ids from SOLR for request Id
{}", requestId);
Map props = new HashMap();
props.
Ali, does adding a 'hl.q' param help? q=something&hl.q=something&...
On 16 June 2017 at 06:21, Ali Husain wrote:
> Thanks for the replies. Let me try and explain this a little better.
>
>
> I haven't modified anything in solrconfig. All I did was get a fresh
> instance of solr 6.4.1 and create
The query field:* doesn't work with point fields (numerics or dates), only
exact or range queries are supported, so an equivalent query would be field:[*
TO *]
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 15, 2017, at 5:24 PM, Saurabh Sethi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We have a fieldType specified for date. Earlier
I am trying to use solr collapse function:
But seems when we use 2 or more collapse filters, it will throw
NullPointerException?
Does anyone have idea whether solr supports multiple collapse filters?
- it doesn't mention about using 2 or more collapse filters at all at
https://cwiki.apache.org/c
Hi,
We have a fieldType specified for date. Earlier it was using TrieDateField
and we changed it to DatePointField.
Here are the fields used in the query and one of them uses the dateType:
The following query was returning correct results when the field type was
Trie but not with Point:
Embarassing. Yes, it was the proxy. Very old code that has now had a
considerable refresh.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:erik.hatc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 15 June 2017 7:13 p.m.
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: CSV output
Is it the proxy affecting the ou
https://people.apache.org/~hossman/#xyproblem
XY Problem
Your question appears to be an "XY Problem" ... that is: you are dealing
with "X", you are assuming "Y" will help you, and you are asking about "Y"
without giving more details about the "X" so that we can understand the
full issue. Perhaps
Thanks for the replies. Let me try and explain this a little better.
I haven't modified anything in solrconfig. All I did was get a fresh instance
of solr 6.4.1 and create a core testHighlight. I then created a content field
of type text_en via the Solr Admin UI. id was already there, and that
Agree, that's the challenge. Since ComplexPhraseQuery parser needs terms
analyzed/tokenized and if don't, it can't really operate at individual
tokens with fuzzy or wildcard matches. The solution I can think of is to
execute query against both the fields (KeywordTokenized..) and
Non-KeywordTokeniz
I think that's because the KeywordTokenizer by definition produces a single
token (not a phrase).
Perhaps you could create two fields by a copyField - the one you already
have(field1), and one tokenized using StandardTokenizer or
WhiteSpaceTokenizer(field2) which will produce a phrase with multipl
Thanks Susheel. The challenge is that if I search for the word "between"
alone, I still get plenty of results. In a way I want the query to match
the document title exactly (up to a few characters) and the document title
match the query exactly (up to a few characters). KeywordTokenizer allows
tha
Hi Joel,
Yes, I got this error:
{"result-set":{"docs":[{"EXCEPTION":"Invalid JoinStream - all incoming
stream comparators (sort) must be a superset of this stream's
equalitor.","EOF":true}]}}
Ok, will try out the work around first.
Regards,
Edwin
On 15 June 2017 at 20:16, Joel Bernstein wro
CompledPhraseQuery parser is what you need to look
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Other+Parsers#OtherParsers-ComplexPhraseQueryParser.
See below for e.g.
http://localhost:8983/solr/techproducts/select?debugQuery=on&indent=on&q=manu:%22Bridge%20the%20gat~1%20between%20your%20ski
Hello,
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Pagination-bug-when-sorting-by-a-field-not-unique-field-tp4327408p4327524.html
might be relevant.
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Preeti Chhabra <
preeti.chha...@karexpert.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> With respects to cursors, when using a computed sort val
Hello,
With respects to cursors, when using a computed sort value (like score)
in combination with the unique field sort (score desc, id asc) seems to
cause some wildly inconsistent and incomplete results. Can I get any
help out of it?
Thanks & Regards
Preeti chhabra
It looks like you are running into this bug:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10512. This not been resolved
yet, but I believe there is a work around which is described in the ticket.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 10:09 PM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
wro
Hi,
I am trying to do phrase exact match. For this, I use
KeywordTokenizerFactory. This basically does what I want to do. My field
type is defined as follows:
In addition to this, I want to tolerate typos of two or three lett
Hi Michael,
I have indexed the documents in such a way,I used OpenNLP to extract named
entities and POS and has indexed these data to respective fields. I have
read(my understanding) that for natural language search using Solr,once you
have the entities extracted the next step is to create a custo
Hi Arun,
your question is too generic. What do you mean with nlp search? What do
you expect to happen?
The short answer is: No, there is no such parser because the individual
requirements will vary a lot.
-Michael
Am 14.06.2017 um 16:32 schrieb aruninfo100:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to configure NL
Is it the proxy affecting the output?What do you get going directly to
Solr's endpoint?
Erik
> On Jun 14, 2017, at 22:13, Phil Scadden wrote:
>
> If I try
> /getsolr?
> fl=id,title,datasource,score&hl=true&hl.maxAnalyzedChars=9000&hl.method=unified&q=Wainui-1&q.op=AND&wt=csv
>
> T
20 matches
Mail list logo
