One of my colleagues ran into this testing the JSON Facet API. A malformed
JSON Facet API range query seems to get a NPE and then devolves into saying
no live servers to handle the request. It looks like the
FacetRangeProcessor should check the inputs before trying to getField. Does
this seem reaso
Thanks!
Now I need to write up the mistakes I made trying to use the solr command.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Feb 24, 2017, at 11:17 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
>
> bq: Which means the docs have a problem, since they are recomm
bq: Which means the docs have a problem, since they are recommending
something that should not be recommended
Absolutely, just changed:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/DataDir+and+DirectoryFactory+in+SolrConfig.
Was that the one that mislead you?
Erick
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10
Running with this, which works they way we want.
/solr/data/${solr.core.name}
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Feb 24, 2017, at 10:08 AM, Walter Underwood wrote:
>
> Dang it. I know better than that, but I was blindly following the
Dang it. I know better than that, but I was blindly following the docs. Which
means the docs have a problem, since they are recommending something that
should not be recommended.
Putting variable data on a different volume is very common. Official support
for that goes at least as far back as U
On 24/02/2017 17:24, Charlie Hull wrote:
Hi all,
Very pleased to announce the first release of Marple, an open source
tool for inspecting Lucene indexes. We've blogged about it here:
http://www.flax.co.uk/blog/2017/02/24/release-1-0-marple-lucene-index-detective/
which contains links to the cod
Hi all,
Very pleased to announce the first release of Marple, an open source
tool for inspecting Lucene indexes. We've blogged about it here:
http://www.flax.co.uk/blog/2017/02/24/release-1-0-marple-lucene-index-detective/
which contains links to the code and released JAR.
This is very much a
I actually started out using 3.4.9, and a tutorial that was recent recommended
using 3.3.x instead since 3.4 "wasn't ready for production". I'm fine with
either really! I did read that in production zk should utilize odd numbers of
servers for sure. 1,3,5 etc etc etc for redundancy purposes f
On 2/23/2017 2:12 PM, Pouliot, Scott wrote:
> I'm trying to find a good beginner level guide to setting up SolrCloud NOT
> using the example configs that are provided with SOLR.
>
> Here are my goals (and the steps I have done so far!):
>
> 1. Use an external Zookeeper server
> a. wget
On 2/23/2017 6:41 PM, Walter Underwood wrote:
> I did this in the solrconfig.xml for both collections (tutors and questions).
>
> /solr/data
>
> I deleted the old collection indexes, reloaded, restarted, and created a new
> collection for “tutors". And I see this on the disk.
Setting dataDir i
I don't see that any index data _is_ outside the data dir.
Configuration stuff might be.
What's the content of
/apps/solr6/server/solr/tutors_shard_1_replica_5?
If it's just some configs
(and maybe even just core.properties) then the index data isn't there, the
"instanceDir" is.
I should probabl
I did see that and was trying to go down that path, but apparently messed
something up! Seems if I start SOLR with the following command, it starts, but
the Admin UI only throws a 500 error.
bin/solr start -c -p 8080 -z 1.1.1.1:2181
It ends up tossing this:
org.apache.solr.common.SolrExceptio
Thanks Alex. I'll thumb through them for sure Most were good when I read
them, but seemed like a few steps they skipped out on adding the details needed
to make it completely painless ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Rafalovitch [mailto:arafa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, F
On 2/23/2017 1:51 AM, SOLR4189 wrote:
> We have maxwarmingSearchers set to 2 and field value cache set to
> initial size of 64. We saw that by taking a heap dump that our caches
> consume 70% of the heap size, by looking into the dump we saw that
> fieldValueCache has 6 occurences of
> org.apache.s
Hi,
mm applies to qf only and pf2/3 is about boosting results that are
matched. What you can do is play with additional fields in qf and/or try
making it work close to your requirement with autoRelax parameter. Note
that in case of autorelax it might result in unexpected results if one
field
15 matches
Mail list logo
