Although I have nested documents in the schema, but if not looking for top
10 parents to facet on children.
Currently, I'm only working on the information that is available in
children. In my case, each line represents a transaction, and I'm doing the
faceting based on these individual transaction
I'm fetching the data for the top 10, and pass them to the JSON Facet query
to do the calculation.
The 100 items is just an example. Some of my collections can have more than
10 million records.
Regards,
Edwin
On 17 February 2017 at 20:51, Michael Kuhlmann wrote:
> It's not possible to do suc
I wrote this tool to help me quickly investigate and diagnose Solr Cloud
issues. I plan to continually add to the tool, and add conveniences for the
collections api in the future such as adding and removing replicas, etc all
using an interactive CLI.
Hope this is helpful to someone out there.
Git
Any idea why I would be getting this on a brand new, empty collection on the
first update?
HTTP ERROR 500
Problem accessing /solr/tutors_shard1_replica9/update. Reason:
Server ErrorCaused
by:java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
org.apache.solr.update.TransactionLog$LogCodec.writeStr(Ljava/lang/Stri
Hi all,
This might be a very basic question, but I’m struggling to find an answer. How
can I access the json I passed as a Post body within Solr RequestHandler. I’m
getting the Url Params using SolrQueryRequest.getParams(), but I’m not able to
figure out how to get Post Body. Could not find an
I'm sorry I didn't see your original question last month, but as you've
since realized you can't use functions like "div" in this way.
The syntax for getting "stats" in the JSON Faceting API doesn't really
make this clear, but the outermost function call you make must be
somethign that can "ag
Hi Shawn,
Thanks for the quick response. Unfortunately, slf4j has nothing to do with
this. I removed the duplicate jars and the problem persists. Here are the
updated logs.
Prashant
17-Feb-2017 19:05:24.618 INFO [localhost-startStop-1]
org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployDirectory Deplo
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce that the Solr Reference Guide
for Solr 6.4 has been released.
This 763-page PDF is the definitive guide to using Apache Solr, the
search server built on Apache Lucene. The Guide can be downloaded
from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/lucene/solr/re
blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px
#715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white
!important; } I have upgraded SOLR version from 5.1.0 to 6.4.0. I noticed with
new version suggestions order is changed little bit.
Uchit Pa
Thanks Alexandre,
I was on a load server so, couldn't change any code but I just enabled debug
logging from Admin UI and I was able to see query in solr log file; which I
turned off after 5 minutes. Thanks again for full list of options available for
various scenarios.
Regards,
Prateek Jain
Well, "it depends". The Atomic update has to first go out to disk and
decompress the original stored fields in 16K blocks,
then overlay the atomic update on the uncompressed doc, then re-index
the doc. 40K times in your example.
So yes, the stream going to Solr will be smaller if you do atomic
upd
There is actually several ways to answer this depending on the level of
precision your situation requires. And, of course, there are trade-offs.
One issue to keep in mind is what you mean by "parameters". Do you want to
include all the explicit defaults and overrides that the Request Handler
will
Am I missing something or do you have nested documents in the schema?
It reads like you looking for top 10 parents and then want to facet on
children. Is that right?
Regards,
Alex
On 17 Feb 2017 5:35 AM, "Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo" wrote:
I'm looking at JSON facet for both of type:terms and type:
On 2/16/2017 11:31 PM, Prashant Saraswat wrote:
> *On Solr 6.3 onwards, the following logs are displayed:*
> SLF4J: Class path contains multiple SLF4J bindings.
> SLF4J: Found binding in
> [jar:file:/home/ubuntu/apache-tomcat-8.5.11/lib/slf4j-log4j12-1.7.7.jar!/org/slf4j/impl/StaticLoggerBinder.
It's not possible to do such thing in one request with faceting only.
The problem is that you need a fixed filter on every item when the facet
algorithm is iterating over it; you can't look into future elements to
find out which ones the top 10 will be.
So either you stick with two queries (which
If you enabled the logging for org.apache.solr.core you should be fine.
You can also go more fine grained if you don't need part of the logs.
Just remember that the UI will show only from the warning level.
If you want to see the query log you need to access the log files.
N.B. in a produciton env
Using the stats component makes short work of things.
stats.true&stats.field=foo
You can determine which stats fields are retrieved, including which
percentiles you'd like to see returned:
stats.true&stats.field{percentiles="15,50,85,90}foo
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/The+S
Hi All,
How can I log queries received by solr from applications. By query, I mean full
URL with parameters executed by application. For example,
I expect to see something like this
http://solr:8389/my_collection?q=*:*&fq=eventRecordTimestamp:[NOW-6MILLISECONDS
TO NOW]
I tried to enable
Hi ,
i would like to use solr text tagger for entity extraction . Please guide
me that how can i use this for a eCommerce web site .
Regards
Midas
On 15/01/17 15:26, Vidal, Gilad wrote:
> Hi,
> Can you direct me for Java example using Solr percentiles?
> The following 3 examples are not seems to be working.
Not sure if this is still relevant, but I use the json.facet parameter
with SolrJ:
query.add("json.facet", "{\"ninety\":\"percentile(v
> I am aware of the requirements to use atomic updates, but as I understood,
> those would not have a big impact on performance and only a slight increase
> in index size?
AFAIK there won't be a difference in index size between atomic updates
and full updates, as the end result is the same.
But
I'm looking at JSON facet for both of type:terms and type:range.
For example, I may have 100 Items in my collections, and each item can have
many transactions. But I'm only interested to look at the top 10 items
which has the highest transaction rate (ie the highest count)
I'm doing a calculation
What were you expecting ?
Those results seems properly sorted to me for the little I see.
If you want to ignore some character and sort in a different way, you may be
interested in possibly alternative field types.
For example :
I think we are missing something here ...
You want to fetch the top 10 results for your query, and allow the user to
navigate only those 10 results through facets ?
Which facets are you interested in ?
Field facets ?
Whatever facet you want, calculating it in your client, on 10 results
shouldn't b
Since you already have the top x items then, wouldn't it be much easier
to collect the "facet" data from the result list on your own?
Am 17.02.2017 um 10:18 schrieb Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Yes, I only want the JSON Facet to query based on the returned result set
> of the itemNo from
Hi Michael,
Yes, I only want the JSON Facet to query based on the returned result set
of the itemNo from the 1st query.
There's definitely more than the 10, but we just need the top 10 in this
case. As the top 10 itemNo may change, so we have to get the returned
result set of the itemNo each time
Hi Guys,
I understand that this configuration is unsupported. However, this was
working until 6.2. I have looked at the changes document for both solr and
lucene for 6.3.0 but I can't figure out what has changed. Can someone point
me in the right direction?
Here are the details.
The following in
27 matches
Mail list logo
