Maciej:
you really have two choices:
1> re-index the entire document with fields a, b, c, d, e, f. In that
case though, why bother indexing the first time ;)
2> use Atomic Updates:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Updating+Parts+of+Documents
but note the restrictions.
Best,
Erick
On 2/15/2017 4:06 PM, Ratan Servegar wrote:
> I've been looking everywhere to find a solution for the problem i've
> having, I am starting an index on a core by making an ajax call from
> my page to the solr server via url. However i want to know the index
> start time and completion time and also
Hello,
I've been looking everywhere to find a solution for the problem i've
having, I am starting an index on a core by making an ajax call from my
page to the solr server via url. However i want to know the index start
time and completion time and also i want to know how many records are
process
CVE-2017-3163: Apache Solr ReplicationHandler path traversal attack
Severity: Moderate
Vendor:
The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected:
Solr 1.4 to 6.4.0
Description:
When using the Index Replication feature, Solr nodes can pull index files from
a master/leader node using an HTTP API w
Hello Sebastian,
Except for the requirement to have all fields stored, there is from
Solr/Lucene's point of view not much difference between indexing a partial
update or a complete document. Under the hood a partial update is a complete
object anyway. Using partial updates you gain a little ban
Dear solr users,
when updating documents in bulk (i.e. 40.000 documents at once), and only
changing the value of a single Boolean-Flag, I currently re-index all whole
40.000 objects. However, the process of obtaining all relevant information for
each object from the database is one of relativel
15 February 2017, Apache Solr™ 5.5.4 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 5.5.4
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform
from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful
full-text search, hit highlighting, facete
Shawn,
We have confirmed that yes, this is just log noise, and possibly related to
the admin interface and not the actual indexing process. As for indexing
stopping, that was not actually the case. I got confused about how many
documents were in the collection I was indexing, and thought there sho
That is not supported. However, you can add
debug.explain.structured=true for a more detailed breakdown of the
information.
Regards,
Alex.
http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and experienced
On 15 February 2017 at 09:03, Gleb wrote:
> How to make parsedquery_toStr
How to make parsedquery_toString more readable? I want read it indented.
+(
(
(name_text_ru:hello)~0.5
(name_text_ru:word)~0.5
(
(name_text_ru:ложка name_text_ru:trump)
)~0.5
)~3
)
--
View
On 2/15/2017 4:06 AM, philippa griggs wrote:
> Solr 5.4.1, multiple cores with two cores per shard. Zookeeper 3.4.6 (5
> zookeeper ensemble).
>
> I have noticed an error with the replication between two cores in a shard.
> I’m having to perform a schema update which means I have to stop and sta
On 2/14/2017 2:45 AM, Sahil Agarwal wrote:
> Can the patch for jira issue SOLR-5730 be backported to solr 5.5.3?? ie.
> Can Lucene's SortingMergePolicy and EarlyTerminatingSortingCollector
> configurable in Solr 5.5.3 too??
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5730
>
> The SortingMergePol
Hi Mohan,
When I said "the ICU folding filter should be the last filter, to allow the
Arabic normalization and stemming filters to see the original words”, I meant
that no filter should follow it.
You did not make that change.
Here’s what I mean:
Which version of Solr do you use? Is it always the same field? Again,
without checking anything, see if it could be that field is not
multivalue and your value is.
In any case, this is inefficient way of indexing. If possible, stream
both sources ordered by ID and merge them in one input doc a
It sounds like Edge, Firefox, and Chrome aren't setup on your computer to
do client authentication. You can set need client authentication to false
and use want client authentication in solr.in.sh. This will allow browsers
that don't present a client certificate to work. Otherwise you need to
confi
No, it's not the case. In both steps I'm indexing documents from the
same set of IDs (I mean the values of the 'id').
Maciej
W dniu 15.02.2017 o 11:07, Emir Arnautovic pisze:
I did not have time to test it or look at the code, but can you check
if it could be the case when there is no documen
Hello,
Solr 5.4.1, multiple cores with two cores per shard. Zookeeper 3.4.6 (5
zookeeper ensemble).
I have noticed an error with the replication between two cores in a shard. I’m
having to perform a schema update which means I have to stop and start the
cores. I’m trying to do this in a
Hi,
I have some problems with client certificates. By the look of it, it works with
curl and safari prompts for and accepts my certificate. Does not work with Edge,
Firefox or Chrome. The certificates are requested from our CA.
When requesting https://s02/solr in the browser, it doesn't
prompt f
Thanks all who replied, lots of information to help us improve our use and
management of Solr!
>
> On 15 February 2017 at 08:04 Michael Kuhlmann wrote:
>
>
> The number of cores is not *that much* important compared to the index
> size, but each core has its memory overhead. For in
I did not have time to test it or look at the code, but can you check if
it could be the case when there is no document with a, b, c fields and
you are trying to update it with d, e, f using partial update syntax.
Emir
On 15.02.2017 09:25, Maciej Ł. PCSS wrote:
Dear All,
how should I handle
Can the Solr branch_5x (specifically, browsing the repo at the point of
SOLR-5730's last commit) be a good place to check in regards to this task?
The team is upgrading to Solr 5 from Solr 4 for now. Im an intern and had
been asked to implement these features and discovered that they already
exist
The other question is what do you hope to gain from SortingMergePolicy and
EarlyTerminatingSortingCollector, and why would you want to do that in Solr
5.5.3 and not upgrade to Solr 6? What prevents you from upgrading I guess
is my real question?
On 15 February 2017 at 05:06, Erick Erickson
wrote
Dear All,
how should I handle the following scenario using SOLRJ? Index a
collection of documents (fill fields a, b, c). Then index the same
collection but this time fill fields d, e, f.
In a pseudo-code it would be: step1(collectionX); step2(collectionX);
solrCommit();
See my observations
The number of cores is not *that much* important compared to the index
size, but each core has its memory overhead. For instance, caches are
based on cores, so you're having 36 individual caches per type.
Best,
Michael
Am 14.02.2017 um 16:39 schrieb Leon STRINGER:
>> On 14 February 2017 at 14
24 matches
Mail list logo
