Just a note that field boosting with the MLT Query Parser is broken, and
for SolrCloud the whole thing is practically unusable if you index stuff
in English because CloudMLTQParser includes strings from field
definitions (such as "stored" and "indexed") in the query. I'm still
hoping someone wi
We are entering entries into SOLR like the following, and we want to see if
my pt matches any of these radiuses.
1. Red, pt=39,-107, radius=10km
2. Blue, pt=39,-108, radius=50km
I want to run a SOLR select with a pt=39,-104 and see if it is within 10km
of point 1, and 50km of point 2?
Usually I
I did, that is returning exact matches first but only when I query with
case matched elements. For example, mumbai's results would be different
then Mumbai's.
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 2:32 AM, Susheel Kumar
wrote:
> Did you try exactMatchFirst param of FuzzyLookupFactory ? See
> https://cwiki.ap
I think there may be a ticket for something similar. Or related to
rerunning a same query/configuration on a new core.
Worth having a quick look anyway.
The challenge would be to write the infrastructure that will unpack
those parameters back into the boxes. Because some go into raw query,
some g
bq: "That is really a job for streaming, not simple faceting.”
True, it’s the next step to improve our performance (right now we are using
JSON facets), and 6.3.0 has a lot of useful tools to work with streaming
expressions. Our last release before 6.3 was 5.3.1 and the streaming
expressions we
Yago Riveiro wrote:
> One thing that I forget to mention is that my clients can aggregate
> by any field in the schema with limit=-1, this is not a problem with
> 99% of the fields, but 2 or 3 of them are URLs. URLs has very
> high cardinality and one of the reasons to sharding collections is
> to
Sebastian,
currently not - i'm sorry to say. We did it for the analysis screen but not
for the query screen. Shouldn't be too hard to add this kind of persitence.
Would you mind opening a ticket, so we can track the progress. Depending on
your knowledge, you might be willing to give it a first wh
Did you try exactMatchFirst param of FuzzyLookupFactory ? See
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Suggester
Thanks,
Susheel
On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 6:52 PM, diwakar bhardwaj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've implemented a solr suggester with FuzzyLookupFactory and its working
> perfectly. Exc
Thanks Erick,
That's pretty much where I'd landed on the issue. To me Solr Cloud is
clearly the preferable option here - especially when it comes to indexing
and cluster management. I'll give "preferLocalShards" a try and see what
happens.
Many thanks for your in-depth analysis!
-Dave
Dave Selt
How's /browse fare for you? What params are you adjusting regularly?
> On Dec 27, 2016, at 06:09, Sebastian Riemer wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> is there an easy way to preserve the query data I input in SolrAdmin?
>
> E.g. when debugging a query, I often have the desire to reopen the current
> query
Use curl and edit a file maybe?
Or edit a file and copy/paste into the address bar? I often do this
and combined with browser format tools for XML or JSON let's me get
by.
IOW, there's really nothing I know of that allows you to save/retrieve
the contents of the admin UI form. It'd be a neat cont
The form of the query doesn't enter into whether query is passed on to
a different replica IIUC. preferLocalShards was created to keep this
from happening though. There's discussion at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6832.
BTW, "it's just a parameter". At root, the sugar methods (SolrJ,
Hehe Good Tip :-)
preferLocalShards may indeed be a good solution. I'll have to figure out
how to pass that parameter using SolrNet.
The queries are quite complex. We're sampling audio, calculating hashes and
comparing them to known hashes.
I'll paste an example below.
Are nested queries more l
I think solr tries itself to load balance. Read this page
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Distributed+Requests
(preferLocalShards!)
Also please write the query.
tip: fill "send" address after completing email
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Dave Seltzer wrote:
> [Forgive the
[Forgive the repeat here, I accidentally clicked send too early]
Hi Everyone,
I have a Solr index which is quite small (400,000 documents totaling 157
MB) with a query load which is quite large. I therefore want to spread the
load across multiple Solr servers.
To accomplish this I've created a S
Hi Everyone,
I have a Solr index which is quite small (400,000 documents totaling 157
MB) with a query load which is quite large. I therefore want to spread the
load across multiple Solr servers.
To accomplish this I've created a Solr Cloud cluster with two collections.
The collections are config
Hi,
is there an easy way to preserve the query data I input in SolrAdmin?
E.g. when debugging a query, I often have the desire to reopen the current
query in solrAdmin in a new browser tab to make slight adaptions to the query
without losing the original query. What happens instead is the form
One thing that I forget to mention is that my clients can aggregate by any
field in the schema with limit=-1, this is not a problem with 99% of the
fields, but 2 or 3 of them are URLs. URLs has very high cardinality and one of
the reasons to sharding collections is to lower the memory footprint
18 matches
Mail list logo
