Hi John,
I need to formulate a query where the both query variable are from document.
Like get me all documents where var_1 > var_2 (var_1 and var_2 both are in
document.)
Thanks and Regards,
Prasanna.
-Original Message-
From: John Bickerstaff [mailto:j...@johnbickerstaff.com]
Sent:
Have you considered the /xport functionality?
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> No, you can't get cursor-marks ahead of time.
> They are the serialized representation of the last sort values
> encountered (hence not known ahead of time).
>
> -Yonik
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at
No, you can't get cursor-marks ahead of time.
They are the serialized representation of the last sort values
encountered (hence not known ahead of time).
-Yonik
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 8:48 PM, Chetas Joshi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using the cursor approach to fetch results from Solr (5.5.0). Most
Hi,
I am using the cursor approach to fetch results from Solr (5.5.0). Most of
my queries return millions of results. Is there a way I can read the pages
in parallel? Is there a way I can get all the cursors well in advance?
Let's say my query returns 2M documents and I have set rows=100,000.
Can
Expanding on my comment on the ticket, I’m really quite happy with using
codahale/dropwizard metrics with Solr. I don’t know if I’m comfortable just
sharing a screenshot of the resulting grafana dashboard, but I’ve got, per-host:
- Percentile latencies and rates for GET vs POST (which in solrclo
Sampling has been on my TODO list for the JSON Facet API.
How much it would help depends on where the bottlenecks are, but that
in conjunction with a hashing approach to collection (assuming field
cardinality is high) should definitely help.
-Yonik
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 3:02 PM, John Davis wro
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5894 had some pretty interesting
looking work on heuristic counts for facets, among other things.
Unfortunately, it didn’t get picked up, but if you don’t mind using Solr 4.10,
there’s a jar.
On 11/4/16, 12:02 PM, "John Davis" wrote:
Hi,
I a
I believe that's what's JSON facet API does by default. Have you tried that?
Regards,
Alex.
Solr Example reading group is starting November 2016, join us at
http://j.mp/SolrERG
Newsletter and resources for Solr beginners and intermediates:
http://www.solr-start.com/
On 5 November 2016 at
What kind of graphical format?
> On Nov 4, 2016, at 14:01, "tesm...@gmail.com" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> My search query comprises of more than one fields like search string, date
> field and a one optional field).
>
> I need to represent these on the web interface to the users.
>
> Secondly, I need
Unless you secure Solr instance well, you should not be exposing your
Solr directly to the client. Anyone who can see Admin UI or /browse
handle can also delete all your documents. I am mentioning this just
in case.
So, you usually need a middleware that maps your requests to Solr.
Either with som
Yes, it works with hours too. You can run a sum function each hour facet
which is named as bucket.
On Nov 4, 2016 10:14 PM, "William Bell" wrote:
> How about hours?
>
> NOW+1HR
> NOW+2HR
> NOW+12HR
> NOW-4HR
>
> Can we add that?
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Furkan KAMACI
> wrote:
>
>
How about hours?
NOW+1HR
NOW+2HR
NOW+12HR
NOW-4HR
Can we add that?
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Furkan KAMACI
wrote:
> I have documents like that
>
> id:5
> timestamp:NOW //pseudo date representation
> count:13
>
> id:4
> timestamp:NOW //pseudo date representation
> count:3
>
> id:3
> tim
Seems that Solrj doesn't support JSON Facet API yet.
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Furkan KAMACI
wrote:
> Fantastic! Thanks Yonik, I could do the stuff that I want with JSON Facet
> API.
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 8:42 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Furkan KAMACI
Fantastic! Thanks Yonik, I could do the stuff that I want with JSON Facet
API.
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 8:42 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Furkan KAMACI
> wrote:
> > I mean, I have to facet by dates and aggregate values inside that facet
> > range. Is it possible to do
Hi,
I am trying to improve the performance of queries with facets. I understand
that for queries with high facet cardinality and large number results the
current facet computation algorithms can be slow as they are trying to loop
across all docs and facet values.
Does there exist an option to comp
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
> I mean, I have to facet by dates and aggregate values inside that facet
> range. Is it possible to do that without multiple queries at Solr?
This (old) blog shows a percentiles calculation under a range facet:
http://yonik.com/percentiles-for
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Velocity+Search+UI
You might be able to customize velocity.
K
- Original Message -
From: "Binoy Dalal"
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, November 4, 2016 2:33:24 PM
Subject: Re: Custom user web interface for Solr
See t
Erick,
We currently have ramBufferSizeMB at 1024M. For this indexing activity, the
cluster is "offline" thus no queries coming in so not worried about any
user impact or delays should Solr terminate and need to replay. The
thinking was that increasing these values (ramBuffer, commit times, etc)
wo
See this link for more details =>
https://lucidworks.com/blog/2015/12/08/browse-new-improved-solr-5/
On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 12:02 AM Binoy Dalal wrote:
> Have you checked out the /browse handler? It provides a pretty rudimentary
> UI for displaying the results. It is nowhere close to what you wo
Have you checked out the /browse handler? It provides a pretty rudimentary
UI for displaying the results. It is nowhere close to what you would want
to present to your users but it is a good place to start off.
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 11:32 PM tesm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
My search query compris
I believe your answer is in the subject
=> facet.range
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Faceting#Faceting-RangeFaceting
//
On 11/04/2016 02:25 PM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
I have documents like that
id:5
timestamp:NOW //pseudo date representation
count:13
id:4
timestamp:NOW //p
I have documents like that
id:5
timestamp:NOW //pseudo date representation
count:13
id:4
timestamp:NOW //pseudo date representation
count:3
id:3
timestamp:NOW-1DAY //pseudo date representation
count:21
id:2
timestamp:NOW-1DAY //pseudo date representation
count:29
id:1
timestamp:NOW-3DAY //pseu
Hi,
My search query comprises of more than one fields like search string, date
field and a one optional field).
I need to represent these on the web interface to the users.
Secondly, I need to represent the search data in graphical format.
Is there some Solr web client that provides the above f
Hi Shawn,
You are right, ClientUtils.escapeQueryChars() breaks the functionality. My
expectation was that: Solrj has
addDateRangeFacet
However there is not a direct method for facet.date query.
Kind Regards,
Furkan KAMACI
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 11/4/2016 10:
On 11/4/2016 10:22 AM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
> I send a query to Solr to get information about each day of current week
> via this way:
>
> &q=*:*
> &fq=type:dps
> &rows=0
> &facet=true
> &facet.date=date
> &facet.date.start=NOW/DAY-6DAYS
> &facet.date.end=NOW/DAY%2B1DAY
> &facet.date.gap=%2B1DAY
>
Hi,
I send a query to Solr to get information about each day of current week
via this way:
&q=*:*
&fq=type:dps
&rows=0
&facet=true
&facet.date=date
&facet.date.start=NOW/DAY-6DAYS
&facet.date.end=NOW/DAY%2B1DAY
&facet.date.gap=%2B1DAY
I want to make that query over Solrj.
This facet.date defini
*Deserves* to mention: I run Solr on 8080 port, and Firewall blocks *port*
8080. It is not indeed securing by IP address!
“block by IP” vs. “block by port number”
“block *all* services run on a machine by IP address” vs. “block only Jetty”
and etc.
Still need option for Jetty, it will simpl
Yes we need that documented,
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8924102/restricting-ip-addresses-for-jetty-and-solr
Of course Firewall is a must for extremely strong environments / large
corporations, DMZ, and etc; IPTables is the simplest solution if you run Linux;
my vendor 1and1.com provide
Every time your ramBufferSizeMB limit is exceeded, a segment is
created that's eventually merged. In terms of _throughput_, making
this large usually doesn't help much after about 100M (the default).
It'd be interesting to see if it changes your I/O activity though.
BTW, I'd hard commit (openSearc
Hmm, I'm not quite sure we can help you as this sounds like
Sitecore-specific functionality. Here's my total guess anyway. The
docs are somehow getting
indexed directly to CD and CD is a slave to CM. So the next time a
replication is triggered (see the settings in solrconfig.xml) the
index from CM
We are using Solr 5.4 to index TBs of documents in a bulk fashion to get
the cluster up and running. Indexing is over HTTP round robin as directed
by zookeeper.
Each of the 13 nodes is receiving about 6-8 MB/s on the NIC but solr is
writing around 20 to 25 thousand times per second (4k block size)
Hi Gustatec,
Relevancy tuning is really *huge* area, check this book when you have a
chance: https://www.manning.com/books/relevant-search
Default Solr sorting is based on TF/IDF algorithm; and sorting is not
necessarily ‘relevancy’
Trivial solution for clothes store domain would be this one, b
Seconding Shawn, if your queries will always aim the active documents you
will see :
High level this is what is going to happen :
A) You need to run your query + a filter query that will retrieve only
active documents.
The filter query results will be cached.
Solr will query over the entire docume
Great! Thank you so much. ^^
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Apache-Solr-Question-tp4304308p4304437.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Gustatec,
your problem seems a fairly basic relevance problem.
Instead of elevating documents, why don't you include the category as part
of the main query ?
To make it simple in Solr you have a query component which affect the score
and the filter queries which don't.
If in your case you add t
Hello everyone!
I'm currently using Solr in a project (pretty much an e-commerce POC) and
came across with the following sort situation:
I have two products one called Product1 and other one called Product2, both
of them belongs to the same categories, Shirt(ID 1) and Tank-Top(ID 2)
When i query
On 11/4/2016 8:22 AM, Vincenzo D'Amore wrote:
> Given 2 collection A and B:
>
> - A collection have 5 M documents with an attribute active: true/false.
> - B collection have only 2.5 M documents, but all the documents have
> attribute active:true
> - in any case, A or B, I can only search upon docu
Thanks all for sharing your thoughts!
-Original message-
> From:Joel Bernstein
> Sent: Friday 4th November 2016 1:28
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: UpdateProcessor as a batch
>
> This might be useful. In this scenario you load you content into Solr for
> staging and p
Hi all,
it's trivia time :) hope you enjoy the question.
Given 2 collection A and B:
- A collection have 5 M documents with an attribute active: true/false.
- B collection have only 2.5 M documents, but all the documents have
attribute active:true
- in any case, A or B, I can only search upon do
Not to knock the other suggestions, but a benefit to securing Jetty like
this is that *everyone* can do this approach.
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 9:54 AM john saylor wrote:
> hi
>
> any firewall worth it's name should be able to do this. in fact, that is
> one of several things that a firewall was d
hi
any firewall worth it's name should be able to do this. in fact, that is
one of several things that a firewall was designed to do.
also, you are stopping this traffic at the application, which is good;
but you'd prolly be better off stopping it at the network interface
[using a firewall,
I run a small solrcloud on a set of internal IP address. I connect with a
routed OpenVPN so I hit solr on 10.8.0.1:8983 from my desktop. Only my web
clients are on public IPs and only those clients can talk to the inside
cluster.
That's how I manage things...
On 4 November 2016 at 09:27, David Sm
I was just researching how to secure Solr by IP address and I finally
figured it out. Perhaps this might go in the ref guide but I'd like to
share it here anyhow. The scenario is where only "localhost" should have
full unfettered access to Solr, whereas everyone else (notably web clients)
can onl
docValues are enabled (in the type) and with the latest schema
version, docvalues can be returned even if stored is off.
You can disable docValues or disable them returning a value unless
requested explicitly in fl param.
Regards,
Alex.
P.s. I am not say that was a smart idea to do in the defa
I'm using Solr 6.2.1. Schema is static (schema.xml) and some fields look like
and so on. But when querying in web browser GUI I can see, that these fields
are stored though and values are returned on query. How can this happen?
Looking into web schema browser I can see fields with followin
To add: I am passing parameter defType=edismax.
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Gintautas Sulskus <
gintautas.suls...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I search for "London" with the following query, I get London city at
> the top.
>
> name:London^10
> category:City^5
> category:Organization^1
>
>
Hi,
If I search for "London" with the following query, I get London city at the
top.
name:London^10
category:City^5
category:Organization^1
Now I would like to store this query in SearchHandler with a parameter
$term instead of the hard-coded word "London". However, I am not sure how
the query
You'll have to enumerate them (see the Luke request handler) and specify them
explicitly.
> On Nov 4, 2016, at 03:40, Midas A wrote:
>
> i want to create facet on all dynamic field (by_*) . what should be the
> query ?
Hi All,
I'm having an odd issue with Solr, and am looking for some help or suggestions.
We're using Solr (on a Sitecore website) for search and some search-driven
pages. CM is pointing to a sitecore_master_index in Solr, while CD is pointing
to a sitecore_web_index. We're using the OnPublishEndA
i want to create facet on all dynamic field (by_*) . what should be the
query ?
50 matches
Mail list logo
