Alessandro Benedetti wrote:
> So basically using your tool you build a copy of the index ( similar to
> what optimize does) without affecting the main index right ?
Yes. Your step-by-step is spot on.
In the end we re-indexed everything, because there were other issues with the
index we wanted t
hello,dear
i have a question about solr 6 or 1.6
question: solr 6 : search query with spaces between other languages words
query:
../solr/human_info/select?q=title:دانش آموزان
گاج&rows=0&facet.pivot=title&facet=true&facet.pivot.mincount=1
دانش آموزان گاج -> into english means -> GAJ institu
Thank you for your reply.
After some experimentation and reading of jetty docs, I found that by
deleting the "--daemon" argument and add "--module=http" to my startup
script, I was able to get Solr running, albeit, with several warnings
that I would like to resolve.
When you say "look at ful
Workarounds
1. get a VM with openness and bash.
2. Enable +x (echo expanded commands) on the first line of the script where
it specifies bash
3. Run the script with 'tee' or 'transcript' or other output redirect. Use
the full JVM launching command to see full expanded parameter list.
Or get Solr
A unix system w/o bash is rare enough these days, it's unlikely to be supported.
As a workaround, last I checked, I was still able to create a WAR (by
jarring up the appropriate directory) and launch it the old 4.x way
(java -jar start.jar)
For your setup, try putting the webapp in /var/solr6/weba
I'm attempting to upgrade a Solr 4.8.1 instance to 6.1. The host OS is
OpenBSD 6.0.
Attempting to start Solr (as in the on-line QuickStart) with:
bin/solr start -e cloud -noprompt
fails with the error "env: bash: No such file or directory". Apparently
bin/solr is a bash script. The OpenBSD
I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9437 for the proposal
below.
I suppose beside feasibility, there’s the question of whether the change is
needed by others. I’d love to hear if it meets anyone else’s needs.
- Ronald S. Wood
On 8/24/16, 15:08, "Ronald Wood" wrote:
OK.
Hi,
The API to backup(action=BACKUP) has not been implemented for Solr 6.0.0. I
used the replication end pt. to create a backup which it did. When I try to
restore from backup Solr throughs:
"exception":"java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space"
I would believe that the amount of memory used
OK. Thank you, Alessandro, for clarifying this matter.
The reason I wasn’t sure about this is that this is somewhat ambiguous in the
documentation. In the 6.1 Guide I see: “If you have already indexed data into
your Solr index, you will need to completely re-index your content after
changing yo
Thanks a lot for your answer.
Best regards,
elisabeth
2016-08-24 16:16 GMT+02:00 Shawn Heisey :
> On 8/24/2016 5:44 AM, elisabeth benoit wrote:
> > I'd like to know what is the best way to have the equivalent of tomcat
> > localhost_access_log for solr 5?
>
> I don't know for sure what that is,
hello,dear
i have a question about solr 6 or 1.6
question: how do i search or query in solr 1.6 that bring my filed values
without seperate words although space between iranian-persian or arabic
language character
for example:
../tableName/select?q=*:*&fq={!q.op=AND df=title}دانش آموزان
گاج&rows=
On 8/24/2016 5:44 AM, elisabeth benoit wrote:
> I'd like to know what is the best way to have the equivalent of tomcat
> localhost_access_log for solr 5?
I don't know for sure what that is, but it sounds like a request log.
If you edit server/etc/jetty.xml you will find a commented out section
of
Hi all,
We're participating in three events in Glasgow, London and Boston over
the next couple of months - details in my blog at
http://www.flax.co.uk/blog/2016/08/24/not-one-three-lucene-hackdays-coming-soon/
. Very interested in any ideas the community has about what we should
try to achiev
I am sorry Ronald but :
" ask because my presupposition has been that we could turn it on without
any harm as we incrementally converted our indexes."
This is not possible, if you change the schema and then slowly update the
documents you are introducing inconsistency that will reflect in sorting
Yes, Shawn, our indexes meet the requirements for atomic updates.
We actually depend on atomic updates since our users can alter metadata about
any of our indexed records. We don’t have to incur the cost of a full re-index
of a record for every change. This is especially critical when a user do
On 8/23/2016 2:01 PM, Ronald Wood wrote:
> In general, is there a way to migrate existing indexes (we have petabytes of
> data) by enabling docvalues and incrementally re-indexing? We expect the
> latter would take a month using an atomic update process.
One way to handle it is to build a new in
Thanks Toke. I’ve read some of your other helpful blog entries but I missed
that one.
Did you find you had to do a full conversion all at once because simply turning
on docvalues in the schema caused issues?
I ask because my presupposition has been that we could turn it on without any
harm a
Hello again,
We're planning on using solr 5.5.2 on production, using installation
script install_solr_service.sh.
I was wondering was is the right way to prevent solr 5 from creating a new
log file at every startup (and renaming the actual file mv
"$SOLR_LOGS_DIR/solr_gc.log" "$SOLR_LOGS_DIR/sol
In addition to what Erick said, there is actually a smaller implication
between Stored and docValues as well .
With latest Solr releases docValues data structures are used to fetch the
stored content.
In the case of multi-valued fields, we can have inconsistency with the
ordering of the multiple va
Hello,
I'd like to know what is the best way to have the equivalent of
tomcat localhost_access_log for solr 5?
Best regards,
Elisabeth
Hi Toke !
Good stuff !
So basically using your tool you build a copy of the index ( similar to
what optimize does) without affecting the main index right ?
So the procedure would be :
1) Solr is running
2) Run the tool pointing to the Solr Index, this will be slow but will
generate a new index co
On Tue, 2016-08-23 at 20:01 +, Ronald Wood wrote:
> In general, is there a way to migrate existing indexes (we have
> petabytes of data) by enabling docvalues and incrementally re-
> indexing? We expect the latter would take a month using an atomic
> update process.
I did write a tool for that
I did start start with this but it's a limited approach since it only works
with text fields. Right now I'm using this with a bunch of custom fields
extended to support payloads but that is expensive to maintain between
versions, especially when APIs change so I'm looking for a less invasive
way o
I tried that too, with no effect.
The excluded facet just disappears completely (even the value that is filtered
on in the fq) when using the exclusion that has been tagged, like it did before.
When using a random exclusion (e.g. foo) that facet is visible again in the
result set, but that's obv
Sure. There are might mismatch with expectation. However, the first guess
is to put {!tag into beginning. eg, check with
fq={!tag=myTag}{!parent which='isparent:true'}color:blue
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Tobias Lorenz wrote:
> Hi Mikhail,
>
> Thanks for replying so quickly with a suggesti
25 matches
Mail list logo
