Looking deeper into zookeeper as truth mode I was wrong about existing
replicas being recreated once storage is gone.. Seems there is intent for
the type of behavior based upon existing tickets.. We'll look at creating a
patch for this too..
Steve
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 6:00 PM Tomás Fernández Löb
Either that's a typo or your problem is it should be terms.fl, not
terms.f1 (lower case ell as
opposed to the number one). You should be seeing the raw terms in your index
with TermsComponent, similar to the "load terms" in the schema browser except it
allows you to query specific terms starting wi
Hi Erick,
By TermsCoponent, I think you meant me to try the following?
http://vottopg15.ottawa.ibm.com:8983/solr/testdata/terms?terms.f1=ALL_FIELDS&terms.prefix=the
If so, I tried it and I'm getting 0 hits:
0
0
In fact, I'm getting 0 hits on anything I pass to
Thanks for the quick reply Erick.
Here is the analyzer I'm using:
If in fact it is my analyzer, what part of it is causing this? If not, I'm
not clear about the "TermsComponent" that you suggested having me look
into. How do
My guess is that your field analysis isn't stripping the various non alpha-num
characters, thus "the]" is actually a token in your index, square bracket and
all. If that's true, it certainly doesn't match the stopword "the".
You can check by using the TermsComponent, pointing it at your field
and
The leader will do the replication before responding to the client, so lets
say the leader gets to update it's local copy, but it's terminated before
sending the request to the replicas, the client should get either an HTTP
500 or no http response. From the client code you can take action (log,
ret
HI Everyone,
I'm trying to understand why I get a hit when I search for "the}" but not
when I search for "the" (searches are done without the quotes and "the" is
a stopword in my case).
Here is the debugQuery output using "the}":
"debug": {
"rawquerystring": "the}",
"querystring": "the}
Hello,
Can someone help me to clarify and document how to use ImplicitSnitch
preferredNodes rule to implement scenario where search queries executed
from data center DC1 client, uses all dc1 replica's and data center DC2
client, uses all dc2 replica's.
The only source I see is the discussion from
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
Can someone walk a noob through setting up a dataimport handler?
I need to index a coldfusion website
Thanks,
Kris
~~
Kris T. Musshorn
FileMaker Developer - Contractor – Catapult Technology Inc.
US Army Research Lab
Aberdeen Proving Gro
Hi
I indexed pdf files yo solr.and now I wanna to know is there any way to
uplaod a pdf file and solr return related pdf in result?
I mean I don't want to index pdf file (the file that I wanna to get pdf
more like this for this pdf).and just upload pdf file and get mlt
result.can I do this??
@Tomas and @Steven
I am a bit skeptical about this two statements:
If a node just disappears you should be fine in terms of data
> availability, since Solr in "SolrCloud" replicates the data as it comes it
> (before sending the http response)
and
>
> You shouldn't "need" to move the storage as
Lorenzo, this probably comes late, but my systems guys just don't want to give
me real disk. Although RAID-5 or LVM on-top of JBOD may be better than Amazon
EBS, Amazon EBS is still much closer to real disk in terms of IOPS and latency
than NFS ;)I even ran a mini test (not an official ben
Because access to Solr is typically to an API, rather than to webapps having
images and static files that can be served directly, I think you can use
mod_proxy_http just as well as mod_jk. I would suggest you not pursue trying
to get AJP to work.
mod_proxy_balancer will work with mod_proxy_ht
I think there are two parts to this question:
* If a node just disappears you should be fine in terms of data
availability, since Solr in "SolrCloud" replicates the data as it comes it
(before sending the http response). Even if the leader disappears and never
comes back as long as you have one rep
Solr/Lucene indexes are identical between SolrCloud and stand-alone,
so yes you can move them around. I'm assuming your existing
stand-alone is NOT sharded.
1> bring up a new SolrCloud collection with a single replica (i.e.
replicationFactor=1).
2a> use the replication API fetchindex
(https://cwik
You shouldn't "need" to move the storage as SolrCloud will replicate all
data to the new node and anything in the transaction log will already be
distributed through the rest of the machines..
One option to keep all your data attached to nodes might be to use Amazon
EFS (pretty new) to store your
The ticket in question is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9265
We are working on a patch now... will update when we have a working patch /
tests..
Shawn is correct that when adding a new node to a SolrCloud cluster it will
not automatically add replicas/etc..
The idea behind this patc
Yes,
as a matter of fact I ended up doing all those steps you described. When a
new node joins I check if a shard is missing a replica, if it does then I
add a live node not being used by other shards using the ADDREPLICA call.
Same thing applies for when I found down nodes, I just delete them usin
On 5 July 2016 at 15:55, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 7/5/2016 1:19 AM, Lorenzo Fundaró wrote:
> > Hi Shawn. Actually what im trying to find out is whether this is the best
> > approach for deploying solr in the cloud. I believe solrcloud solves a
> lot
> > of problems in terms of High Availability b
Hi All,
I have an index with 10m documents.
When performing an MLT query and grouping by a field, response times are
roughly 20s.
The group field is currently populated with unique values, as we now
start to manually group documents (hence using MLT).
The group field has docValues turned o
On 7/5/2016 1:19 AM, Lorenzo Fundaró wrote:
> Hi Shawn. Actually what im trying to find out is whether this is the best
> approach for deploying solr in the cloud. I believe solrcloud solves a lot
> of problems in terms of High Availability but when it comes to storage
> there seems to be a limitat
On 7/4/2016 7:46 AM, Lorenzo Fundaró wrote:
> I am trying to run Solr on my infrastructure using docker containers
> and Mesos. My problem is that I don't have a shared filesystem. I have
> a cluster of 3 shards and 3 replicas (9 nodes in total) so if I
> distribute well my nodes I always have 2 fa
On 7/2/2016 2:26 AM, Kent Mu wrote:
> I do understand your explaination, but another question accurs, When I
> create CloudSolrServer Connection by singleton pattern like this, and
> I call shutdown, but it's OK. the solr version is 4.9.0. that's why?
If SolrJ 4.9.0 allows you to call shutdown on
Hello
Thanks for your reply. When I search for Diabetes I get the results back and
also suggestion for diabetes - which is just a lower case version of
Diabetes. This is true for any search words. When I type in Health - I get
results back and also suggestion for health.
I have applied the necess
Another update:
After creating a new certificate, properly specified for its use of context, do
we still end up in the described situation. Thus, it seems SSL itself is the
underlying reason for the leak -
-Original Message-
From: Mads Tomasgård Bjørgan [mailto:m...@dips.no]
Sent: tir
Hi Uwe,
At first look, your configuration seems correct,
see my comments below.
On 28/06/16 15:36, Uwe Reh wrote:
9. Start CDCR
http://SOURCE:s_port/solr/scoll/cdcr?action=start&wt=json
{"responseHeader":{"status":0,"QTime":13},"status":["process","started","buffer","enabled"]}
! (not even a
Hi Dmitry,
On 28/06/16 13:19, dmitry.medve...@barclays.com wrote:
No ERRORS and queue size is equal to 0.
Should I extend the logging lever to Max maybe? Currently it's default.
How can I know, if a commit operation has been sent to the 2 target clusters
after the replication? What command sho
Hi,
Thanks for the reply. Yes I am getting same result with and without
suggest.cfq parameter.
Thanks,
Rajesh Kapur
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Alessandro Benedetti
wrote:
> Hi Rajesh,
> I will take a look to your config as soon as I have 5 minutes, in the
> meantime, can you specify what
Hi Rajesh,
I will take a look to your config as soon as I have 5 minutes, in the
meantime, can you specify what is the output you get and what is the output
you expect ?
You simply don't get the filter applied ?
Cheers
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 5:10 AM, Rajesh Kapur
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I tried to
Hi again,
We turned off SSL - and now everything works as normal.
The certificate is not originally meant for being used on the current servers-
but we would like to keep it as the certificate has been deployed already and
used by our customers. Thus we need to launch the cloud with
"-Dsolr.ssl
HI,
Can some one guide me on this?
I have a standalone SOLR instance running as a service in Windows, I would like
to move towards the SOLR CLOUD, as it provides various benefits like DR,
scalability etc. I would like to use the same instance or core if possible from
the standalone instance to
Hello,
We're struggling with memory-issues when posting documents to Solr - and unsure
for which reason the problem occurs.
The documents are indexed in a SolrCloud running Solr 6.1.0 on top of Zookeeper
3.4.8, utilizing three VMs running CentOS 7 and JRE 1.8.0.
After various attempts with diff
Hi guys. Thank you for your answers. @Upayavira I'm interested on your
presentation. @steven im also interested on this patch you're working on.
I actuallly believe that a solution is can be something like a supervisor
or sidekick that knows when the containers die and provisions the new ones
with
Hi Shawn. Actually what im trying to find out is whether this is the best
approach for deploying solr in the cloud. I believe solrcloud solves a lot
of problems in terms of High Availability but when it comes to storage
there seems to be a limitation that can be workaround of course but it's a
bit
34 matches
Mail list logo
