Hi,
I tried to implement suggester using SOLR 6.0.1 with context field. PFB the
configuration we are using to implement suggester
mySuggester
AnalyzingInfixLookupFactory
suggester_infixdata_dir
DocumentDictionaryFactory
SearchSuggestions
Have you deleted the log and snapshots (the place where the configurations
are stored) in the zookeeper?
If you have deleted them, then you will need to push your configurations to
zookeeper again before creating the collection.
Regards,
Edwin
On 4 July 2016 at 21:37, Swaraj Kumar wrote:
> Hi
Hi,
I would like to find out, is there any implication of using termVectors,
but setting the term offsets to false?
This is what I am setting for my
I'm currently setting the termOffsets to false, because when I set it to
true, I'm getting this error during highlighting if I have 3 or more valu
NO Ediwin. Thanks for your response.
i was checking how to check [1 TO 5] as a content not as a range query.
i tried by escaping [ and ] and did not work. seems need to check analyzers
at index side.
Regards,
Anil
On 5 July 2016 at 08:42, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo wrote:
> Hi Anil,
>
> Are you refe
Hi Anil,
Are you referring to something like q=level:[1 TO 5] ? This will search for
level that ranges from 1 to 5.
You may refer to the documentation here:
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrQuerySyntax
Regards,
Edwin
On 4 July 2016 at 15:05, Anil wrote:
> HI,
>
> how can index and query conte
I don't think that's a bad approach with the sidecar.. We run a huge number
of solr ~5k instances so adding sidecars for each one ads a lot of extra
containers..
What I mean by transition is a container dying and a new one being brought
online to replace it.. With the mod we are working on you won
What do you mean by a "transition"?
Can you configure a sidekick container within your orchestrator? Have a
sidekick always run alongside your SolrCloud nodes? In which case, this
would be an app that does the calling of the API for you.
Upayavira
On Mon, 4 Jul 2016, at 08:53 PM, Steven Bower wr
Hi Vasu,
This question appears occasionally in the mailing list.
Please see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7148
ahmet
On Monday, July 4, 2016 9:10 PM, Vasu Y wrote:
Hi,
I have a single type field that can contain zero or more values (comma
separated values). This field stores
My main issue is having to make any solr collection api calls during a
transition.. It makes integrating with orchestration engines way more
complex..
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 3:40 PM Upayavira wrote:
> Are you using Solrcloud? With Solrcloud this stuff is easy. You just add
> a new replica for a c
Are you using Solrcloud? With Solrcloud this stuff is easy. You just add
a new replica for a collection, and the data is added to the new host.
I'm working on a demo that will show this all working within Docker and
Rancher. I've got some code (which I will open source) that handles
config uploads
Hi,
I have a single type field that can contain zero or more values (comma
separated values). This field stores some sort of access value.
In the filter, I am given a list of allowed values for the field and a
document must be considered if all values contained in its field must be
present in the
We have been working on some changes that should help with this.. 1st
challenge is having the node name remain static regardless of where the
node runs (right now it uses host and port, so this won't work unless you
are using some sort of tunneled or dynamic networking).. We have a patch we
are wor
On 7/4/2016 10:18 AM, Lorenzo Fundaró wrote:
> when deploying solr (in solrcloud mode) in the cloud one has to take
> care of storage, and as far as I understand it can be a problem
> because the storage should go wherever the node is created. If we have
> for example, a node on EC2 with its own pe
Hi guys,
when deploying solr (in solrcloud mode) in the cloud one has to take care
of storage, and as far as I understand it can be a problem because the
storage should go wherever the node is created. If we have for example, a
node on EC2 with its own persistent disk, this node happens to be the
On 7/4/2016 7:04 AM, Rahul Verma wrote:
> While tracing a bug in one of our systems we notices some interesting
> behavior from Solr. These two queries return different results. I fail
> to understand why the second query returns empty results just by
> adding brackets. Can you please help us under
On 7/4/2016 3:54 AM, Andreas Kahl wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> we've setup two Solr servers (not SolrCloud) which shall be accessed
> via Apache webserver's load balancing (either mod_proxy_balancer or
> mod_jk).
>
> 1. Is it possible to configure Solr >5 to enable an AJP port as this
> was the cas
The Lucene query parser is _not_ a boolean query
language, see Hossman's excellent explanation here:
https://lucidworks.com/blog/2011/12/28/why-not-and-or-and-not/
In this case, add &debug=query to them both and you'll see something like:
---no parens
"-cat:electronics +name:test"
---parens
"+(-c
Thanks!
I understand now, let's focus on next question.
I configured the "maxConnections" and "maxConnectionsPerHost" in solr.xml
as you said before.
But I got the same failure result.
Looks like the http connection pool is exhausted and most threads are
waiting to get a free connection.
the confi
Hello guys,
I am trying to run Solr on my infrastructure using docker containers and
Mesos. My problem is that I don't have a shared filesystem. I have a
cluster of 3 shards and 3 replicas (9 nodes in total) so if I distribute
well my nodes I always have 2 fallbacks of my data for every shard. Eve
Hi,
I was trying to delete a collection in solrcloud but some server didn't
respond and hence some shard and replica didn't get deleted.
I deleted physical memory of remaining shard and replica manually but I can
see my collection reference in solrcloud because it is not able to find
core.
No wh
This is a recurrent question,
according to my knowledge docValues are not supported for analyzed fields (
even if the analysis is simply not tokenizing but only lowercasing).
At the moment as Erick suggested I encourage you to do the lowercasing
before the indexing phase, when you supply your data
Hi Harsha,
my blog can help :
http://alexbenedetti.blogspot.co.uk/2015/07/solr-you-complete-me.html
Take a look to the related section.
Cheers
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> 1> The difference is that the factory returns the original field
> from a "sidecar" index. If
Have you tried with docValues for the fields involved in the collapse group
head selection ?
With a group head selection of "min" "max"and "sort" should work quite well.
Of course it depends of your formula.
Does your index change often ?
If the warming time is not a problem you could try with :
Hi Kalpana,
can you explain better ?
In your index you have "diabetes" .
Which suggestion you would prefer to see ?
Seems not ab-normal to me.
Cheers
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 9:18 PM, Kalpana
wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am getting suggestions for Diabetes as diabetes - even though it brings
> the same
Hi everyone,
While tracing a bug in one of our systems we notices some interesting
behavior from Solr.
These two queries return different results. I fail to understand why the
second query returns empty results just by adding brackets. Can you please
help us understand this behavior?
*1. Without
Hello everyone,
we've setup two Solr servers (not SolrCloud) which shall be accessed via
Apache webserver's load balancing (either mod_proxy_balancer or mod_jk).
1. Is it possible to configure Solr >5 to enable an AJP port as this was
the case in earlier versions when running in Tomcat?
2. If
I found that if I set the termOffsets="false", then I can eliminate the
error, and the highlighting will work normally.
But what could be the reason that setting the termOffsets will cause the
error on the multiValued field with fieldType="string"?
Regards,
Edwin
On 4 July 2016 at 12:30, Zheng
Hi,
I have metadata and file indexed in solr. All have a different id of
cause but share the same value for "returnId" if they belong to the same
metadata that describes a bunch of files (1:n).
When I start a search. I usually use grouping instead of join queries to
keep the information wher
HI,
how can index and query content with brackets as bracket is used for range
query
Ex : [DATA]
-
Anil
29 matches
Mail list logo