What is? You have to separate getting the response from rendering, so first
I'd measure with curl or similar. Second, returning 1,000 records is
usually a bad idea, when returning that many rows you may want to use the
export handler.
Sent from my phone
On Jun 16, 2016 3:25 AM, "Thrinadh Kuppili"
In essence, no. The data is, at best, in the wrong shard and at worst
nowhere.
Sent from my phone
On Jun 16, 2016 8:26 AM, "Gary Yao" wrote:
> Hi Erick,
>
> I should add that our Solr cluster is in production and new documents
> are constantly indexed. The new cluster has been up for three weeks
Hey thanks for your reply.
Looks like running the suggested CMS config from Shawn, we're getting some
nodes with 30+sec pauses, I gather due to large heap, interestingly enough
while the scenario Jeff talked about is remarkably similar (we use field
collapsing), including the performance aspects o
No problem :-)
Aurélien
Le 16/06/2016 22:36, Jamal, Sarfaraz a écrit :
Oh, is this what you meant?
content_stemming
I changed it to content_stemming and now it seems to work :) - It was _text_
before -
Thanks! I will update if I discover anything amiss
Th
Oh, is this what you meant?
content_stemming
I changed it to content_stemming and now it seems to work :) - It was _text_
before -
Thanks! I will update if I discover anything amiss
Thanks again so much =)
Sas
-Original Message-
From: Aurélien MAZOYER [ma
Hello =)
Just to be safe and make sure it's happening at indexing time AS WELL as
QUERYING time -
I modified it to be like so:
Hi,
I was just wondering if you are sure that you query only that field (or
fields that use your text_stem analyzer) and not other fields (in your
qf for example is you use edismax) that can give you uncorrect results.
Regards,
Aurélien
Le 16/06/2016 22:29, Jamal, Sarfaraz a écrit :
Hello
Hi,
Yes you should have the same resultset.
Are you sure that you reindex all the data after changing your schema?
Are you sure that you put your analyzer both at indexing and querying?
Are you sure you query only one field?
Regards,
Aurélien
Le 16/06/2016 21:13, Jamal, Sarfaraz a écrit :
Hi
Check your gc log for CMS “concurrent mode failure” messages.
If a concurrent CMS collection fails, it does a stop-the-world pause while it
cleans up using a *single thread*. This means the stop-the-world CMS collection
in the failure case is typically several times slower than a concurrent CMS
HI Ahmet,
Thanks for your guidance.
I just tried the following two configurations:
And
On 6/16/2016 2:35 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
>
> Hmm, merging can't read at 800 MB/sec and only write at 20 MB/sec for
> very long ... unless there is a huge percentage of deletes. Also, by
> default CMS doesn't throttle forced merges (see
> CMS.get/setForceMergeMBPerSec). Maybe capture
> IndexW
Hi Jamal,
Snowball requires lowercase filter above it.
This is documented in javadocs but it is a small but important detail.
Please use a lowercase filter after the whitescpace tokenizer.
Ahmet
On Thursday, June 16, 2016 10:13 PM, "Jamal, Sarfaraz"
wrote:
Hi Guys,
I have enabled stemmin
The repetition below is on purpose to show the contrast between solr
versions.
In Solr 4.10.3, we have autocommits disabled. We do a dataimport of a few
hundred thousand records and have a tlog that grows to ~1.2G.
In Solr 5.5.1, we have autocommits disabled. We do a dataimport of a f
Hi Guys,
I have enabled stemming:
In the Admin Analysis, I type in running or runs and they both break down to
run.
However when I search for run, runs, or running with an actual query -
It brings back three different set
Tomorrow-ish.
--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com
> On Jun 16, 2016, at 4:14 AM, Ramesh shankar wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Yes, i used the solr-6.1.0-79 nightly builds and [subquery] transformer is
> working fine in, any idea of the expected release date for 6.1 ?
>
> Regards
> Ramesh
>
>
>
> --
> View th
Hi,
we're still using Solr 4.10.4 without SolrCloud and create cores
dynamically using the Core Admin API.
We have multiple applications that access a core and create it if it
doesn't exist. To this end, we use the STATUS action to see if a
required core exists and if it doesn't, create it w
In addition to what was proposed
We use the technic described here
https://github.com/cominvent/exactmatch
and it works quite well.
Best regards
Elisabeth
2016-06-15 16:32 GMT+02:00 Alessandro Benedetti :
> In addition to what Erick correctly proposed,
> are you storing norms for your field o
Hi all
I'm investigating a bug where by every term in the highlighted field
gets marked for highlighting instead of just the words that match the
fulltext portion of the query. This is on Solr 5.5.0, but I didn't see
any bug fixes related to highlighting in 5.5.1 or 6.0 release notes.
The query t
Hi Erick,
I should add that our Solr cluster is in production and new documents
are constantly indexed. The new cluster has been up for three weeks now.
The problem was discovered only now because in our use case Atomic
Updates and RealTime Gets are mostly performed on new documents. With
almost a
Taking a look into the code :
The spellcheck.alternativeTermCount Parameter
Specify the number of suggestions to return for each query term existing in
the index and/or dictionary. Presumably, users will want fewer suggestions
for words with docFrequency>0. Also setting this value turns "on"
conte
Hmm, merging can't read at 800 MB/sec and only write at 20 MB/sec for very
long ... unless there is a huge percentage of deletes.
Also, by default CMS doesn't throttle forced merges (see
CMS.get/setForceMergeMBPerSec).
Maybe capture IndexWriter.setInfoStream output?
Mike McCandless
http://blog.
Hi,
Yes, i used the solr-6.1.0-79 nightly builds and [subquery] transformer is
working fine in, any idea of the expected release date for 6.1 ?
Regards
Ramesh
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-6-1-x-Release-Date-tp4280945p4282562.html
Sent from the Solr
Hi,
I was trying to generate a solr war out of the solr 6 source, but even
after i create the war, i was not able to get it deployed correctly on
jboss.
Wanted to know if anyone was able to successfully generate solr war and
deploy it on tomcat or jboss? Really appreciate your help on this.
--
Thanks Eric,
Can you please elaborate "I'd also suggest that your response times are
tunable" ??
I have set the start to 0 and rows to 1000 initially and entered a search
field as below
CompanyName : private limited
when i clicked on search button in the UI it is not responsive at all.
When i r
24 matches
Mail list logo
