No patches, no comments for 4 years almost == no progress,
nobody's interested enough to put the work in to develop it.
So somehow you're running DIH on all the nodes in your
collection? DIH is not "cloud aware", it runs on a node locally
without any understanding that it's part of a collection. T
Why don't you think splitting the shards will do what you need?
Admittedly it will have to be applied to each shard and will
double the number of shards you have, that's the current
limitation. At the end, though, you will have 4 shards when
you used to have 2 and you can move them around to whatev
You haven't responded to Chris's request for clarification.
Best,
Erick
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:43 PM, Tejas Bhanushali
wrote:
> any update on it?
>
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Tejas Bhanushali <
> contact.tejasbhanush...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> Im getting the duplicate
I did a quick experiment (admittedly with 5.x, but even if this is a
bug it won't be back-ported to 5.3) and this works exactly as I
expect. I have three docs with IDs as follows
doc1: . This is equivalent to your ""
doc2: whatever
doc3:
As expected, when the output comes back doc1 has an empty fi
Remove that line of code from your client, or... add the remove blank field
update processor as Hoss suggested. Your code is violating the contract for
the UUID update processor. An empty string is still a value, and the
presence of a value is an explicit trigger to suppress the UUID update
process
I am seeing the UUID getting generated when I set the field as empty string
like this - solrDoc.addField("id", ""); with solr 5.3.1 and based on the
above schema.
The resulting documents in the index are searchable but not sortable.
Someone could verify if this bug exists and file a jira.
Thanks,
"UUID processor factory is generating uuid even if it is empty."
The processor will generate the UUID only if the id field is not specified
in the input document. Empty value and value not present are not the same
thing.
So, please clarify your specific situation.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Thu, Apr
The suggestions from Chris and Erick are probably an answer, but I
just wanted to say that you also looking at this as too much of a
black-box situation.
You are trying to troubleshoot an effect of something specified on the
client from the search results. You can bisect this problem and look
at t
This does not actually say what the product IS and trying to follow
the links gets to the "Yahoo will no long have research division" page
that make this seem to be the "good bye" release!?!
Just an observation,
Alex.
P.s. Global redirect of all blog articles to
https://yahooresearch.tumblr.co
any update on it?
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Tejas Bhanushali <
contact.tejasbhanush...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> Im getting the duplicate result when i do auto suggestion based on
> multiple filed by using copy filed . i have below table configuration .
>
> Segment -- have multiple
10 matches
Mail list logo
