Hi,
In order to enable SSL in solrcloud 5.2.1 on Windows I have done the
following steps:
Created SSL keystore that fits jetty: Via CMD
1. keytool -genkeypair -alias solr-ssl -keyalg RSA -keysize 2048 -keypass
secret -storepass secret -validity -keystore solr-ssl.keystore.jks
-dname "CN=localh
Correction...
Too fast on the send button. The subject should have been SOLR_HOST, not
SOLR_HOME. Sorry for any confusion. Though, the body is correct.
On 3/11/16 9:21 PM, Brian Wright wrote:
Hi,
Another question regarding documentation of Solr and Zookeeper.
The manual states:
Sol
Hi,
Another question regarding documentation of Solr and Zookeeper.
The manual states:
Solr Hostname
Use the |SOLR_HOST| variable in the include file to set the hostname of
the Solr server.
|SOLR_HOST=solr1.example.com|
Setting the hostname of the Solr server is recommended, especial
Sorry for that. i could not share direct query. response header is
"QTime":5536,
"params":{
"hl.fragsize":"50",
"indent":"true",
"hl.simple.pre":"",
"collection":"case-collection_2011",
"hl.fl":"*",
"wt":"json",
"hl":"true",
"rows":"10",
"d
Data driven mode is different from managed schema. It is unfortunate
that in our example configurations we implemented them together.
Managed schema is about using APIs to read/write schema changes. Not
requiring people to hand edit schema.xml is a good thing, IMO.
Data driven schema uses the man
Why not just use the --go-live option for MRIT and _put_ the data in
collectionB? Note this only works for Solr indexes that are hosted on
HDFS...
If your Solr collections are not on HDFS, then it's the same process
as I outlined. You create collectionB and copy things "to the right
place" after M
I'm assuming that by "Angular UI" you're talking the Solr admin UI
(which, BTW, is not recommended for any user-facing UI).
> query against two fields;
Isn't this just putting
project:whatever OR collaborator:whatever
in the "q" box?
> return all fields which we want to display
Just put them i
Hi,
I need to query against two fields (e.g. search term present in either
fields project or collaborator) but return all fields which we want to
display using Angular UI.
Should I combine project and collaborator to some field then query or there
is any better way around
Thanks for your suggest
It's discover as cloud(azure) problem. If you build 'ds' series machine in
classic mode your Internet connection death.. (about 300k/s). I'm very
upset about that.. It's take for me about a day to track down this bug...
On Mar 10, 2016 9:52 PM, "Erick Erickson" wrote:
> This really doesn't have m
Hello. Our company uses Solr-4.10 in a distributed environment. We are
considering how best to customize results based on user preferences,
information about which is obtained from an external service. At present
the preferences can be expressed as filters, but eventually we might want to
intr
Just want to make sure that you can combine two {!parent} and propagate
score from child to parent, like it's described at
http://blog.griddynamics.com/2013/12/grandchildren-and-siblings-with-block.html
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Jhon Smith wrote:
> Mikhail,
>
> > I suppose there are a cl
Got it.
Thank you for clarifying this, I was under impression that I would only be
able to make changes via the API. I will look into this some more.
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 3/11/2016 9:28 AM, Nick Vasilyev wrote:
> > Maybe I am missing something, if that is t
On 3/11/2016 9:28 AM, Nick Vasilyev wrote:
> Maybe I am missing something, if that is the case what is the difference
> between data_driven_schema_configs and basic_configs? I thought that the
> only difference was that the data_driven_schema_configs comes with the
> managed schema and the basic_co
Thank you Erick.
I actually only have an index. I do not have collection B that hosts this
index. The reducers of the MR job build an index (reducer per shard). I'm
looking to load these generated lucene index files to the cores of a
collection (new or existing and then I can work with aliasing a
I start to feel that is not that easy to contribute improvements or small
fix to Solr ( if they are not super interesting to the mass) .
I think this one could be a good improvement in the MLT but I would love to
discuss this with some committer.
The patch is attached, it is there since months ago.
No one didn't care of the topic, let me try in the solr-user list as well !
Does anyone think that should exist a parameter that allow a Suggester to
not return duplicate suggestions ?
In my opinion could be a good improvement !
In the initial patch i was acting at SolrJ level, but to be honest I t
gotcha. thanks for the tips guys
best,
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams Ave
Evansville, IN 47713
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Alessandro Benedetti <
abenede...@apache.org> wrote:
> Copyfield won't work if this
Hi Shawn,
Maybe I am missing something, if that is the case what is the difference
between data_driven_schema_configs and basic_configs? I thought that the
only difference was that the data_driven_schema_configs comes with the
managed schema and the basic_configs come with regular?
Also, I haven'
Copyfield won't work if this is what you meant. The source content of the
field ( prior any analysis) is extracted and then sent to the copy field
where it is analysed.
You need to simulate that approach in the process method of the update
request processor.
But i assume that that was what you tho
makes sense. could i set up a simple regex filter in a placeholder field of
sorts and then copy that field into my tdouble field?
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams Ave
Evansville, IN 47713
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:0
It might be nice to have a specialized update processor for this common
case of wanting to specify two separate but related numeric fields using
one string. IOW, parse out two numbers and then send them to two separate
fields. Seems doable, either as a script or in Java. The script/processor
could
I agree with Upayavira,
this is an information extraction task, you need to implement your logic to
extract the proper numeric values from the textual field.
Your update request processor could be as simple as you want in extracting
the number and setting them in numeric fields.
So this task is res
On 3/11/2016 7:01 AM, Nick Vasilyev wrote:
> Is this now the default behavior for basic_configs? I would really like to
> maintain an option to easily create collection with classic schema settings
> without jumping through all of these hoops.
Starting in 5.5, all examples now use the managed sche
On Fri, 11 Mar 2016, at 03:19 PM, John Blythe wrote:
> hey all,
>
> i'm tossing a lot of mud against the wall and am wanting to see what
> sticks. part of that includes throwing item descriptions against some
> fields i've set up as doubles. the imported data is a double and some of
> the descri
The screenshots didn't come through. Can you paste text into email? The
query URL is the most important thing.
Thx
On Fri, 11 Mar 2016, at 02:00 PM, Anil wrote:
> HI Upayavira,
>
> Thanks for your response. Following are the screenshots of the same
> query with and without partial results in
hey all,
i'm tossing a lot of mud against the wall and am wanting to see what
sticks. part of that includes throwing item descriptions against some
fields i've set up as doubles. the imported data is a double and some of
the descriptions will have the related data within it (product sizes, e.g.
"S
Hi,
I started playing around with Solr 5.5 and created a collection using the
following:
./solr create_collection -c test -p 9000 -replicationFactor 2 -d
basic_configs -shards 2
The collection created fine, however I see that although I specified
basic_configs, it was deployed in managed schema
HI Upayavira,
Thanks for your response. Following are the screenshots of the same query
with and without partial results in the response.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
[image: Inline images 1]
[image: Inline images 2]
Regards,
Anil
On 11 March 2016 at 19:13, Upayavira wrote:
Show us the query URL. It would seem like your timeallowed isn't taking
effect.
Upayavira
On Fri, 11 Mar 2016, at 12:48 PM, Anil wrote:
> Thank you.
>
> in my test, i have timeallowed 10 ms. response has no partial results (no
> partial flag in the response header) and Qtime is 200 ms. so little
Mikhail,
> I suppose there are a clue over there
> http://blog.griddynamics.com/2015/08/scoring-join-party-in-solr-53.html
It worked for two level docs.
If we have 3 level nested docs:
parent -> middle -> child [with price field we try to sort]
then there is a problem when score=min:
If we m
Thank you.
in my test, i have timeallowed 10 ms. response has no partial results (no
partial flag in the response header) and Qtime is 200 ms. so little
confused.
On 11 March 2016 at 18:07, Upayavira wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2016, at 07:22 AM, Anil wrote:
> > HI,
> >
> > is timeallowed is m
Mikhail,
>What if you just forgen about middle level
It worked, thank you.
I need facets from middle level too, and making child query to match both
middle and child level allowes this and facet counts look working fine.
On Fri, 11 Mar 2016, at 07:22 AM, Anil wrote:
> HI,
>
> is timeallowed is max threshold of Qtime ? or overall time ? Please
> clarify.
I do not understand the difference.
Basically, when a query is happening, a collector gathers matching
documents. The timeallowed parameter sets a point at whi
Hey Shawn,
I added segments file information (name and size) to Core admin status API.
Turns out that you might get into NoSuchFileException if indexing happens
and the commit point has changed, but the IndexReader LukeRequestHandler
receives hasn't picked up the new commit yet, in which case the
Hm, it happens on one of our nodes quite frequently, but that was 5.4, maybe
even 5.3.
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error handling 'status' action
at
org.apache.solr.handler.admin.CoreAdminOperation$4.call(CoreAdminOperation.java:192)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.admin.C
Jack, Emir,
Thanks for your answers. Moving ngram logic to client side would be a fast
and easy way to test the solution and compare it with the phonetic one.
Best regards,
Elisabeth
2016-03-11 10:52 GMT+01:00 Emir Arnautovic :
> Hi Elizabeth,
> In order to see if you will get better results, y
Hi Elizabeth,
In order to see if you will get better results, you can move ngram logic
outside of analysis chain - simplest solution is to move it to client.
In such setup, you should be able to use pf2 and pf3 and see if that
produces desired result.
Regards,
Emir
On 10.03.2016 13:47, elisa
On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 12:11 +0800, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo wrote:
> I would like to check, will using the results grouping with group.ngroups
> (which will include the number of groups that have matched the query) in
> the search affects the performance of the Solr?
Yes. Calculating ngroups is done by
38 matches
Mail list logo
