Thanks Erik,
I know the examples use all of that. It was quite a surprise to
discover the films and files examples. I even felt a need to write the
blog post explaining where ALL of the examples and Solr homes hide in
the distribution:
http://blog.outerthoughts.com/2015/11/oh-solr-home-where-art-t
On 2/26/2016 3:53 PM, Toke Eskildsen wrote:
> MarkG wrote:
>> Is there a way anyone can recommend to identify newly added docs to a Solr
>> index. Ie: I have some new docs. I update the index with the new doc and
>> this happens on a regular basis, say every 4 weeks. I want to be able to
>> distin
MarkG wrote:
> Is there a way anyone can recommend to identify newly added docs to a Solr
> index. Ie: I have some new docs. I update the index with the new doc and
> this happens on a regular basis, say every 4 weeks. I want to be able to
> distinguish the docs that are new given in a certain num
Is there a way anyone can recommend to identify newly added docs to a Solr
index. Ie: I have some new docs. I update the index with the new doc and
this happens on a regular basis, say every 4 weeks. I want to be able to
distinguish the docs that are new given in a certain number of days, say 10
da
Hi,
If you don't set (phrase fields) pf* parameters, phrase creation is
automatically disabled, no?
Ahmet
On Friday, February 26, 2016 11:51 PM, Walter Underwood
wrote:
I’m creating a query from MLT terms, then sending it to edismax. The
neighboring words in the query are not meaningfu
Azazel K wrote:
[Toke: 1 shard instead of multiple?]
> The nodes were unstable when we had single shard setup.
> It used to run OOM frequently.
Fair enough.
[Toke: Use a queue instead of 1000+ concurrent requests?]
> There are 16CPU on each node. Requests are live with
> upstream client imp
I’m creating a query from MLT terms, then sending it to edismax. The
neighboring words in the query are not meaningful phrases.
Is there a way to turn off phrase creation and search for one query? Or should
I separate them all with “OR”?
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://obse
data_driven /browse does. And example/files builds upon that a lot more. I did
it that way to personally explore the configset feature.
Erik
> On Feb 26, 2016, at 16:12, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am creating an explanation of solrconfig.xml for the beginners and
> want
> There is a non-trivial overhead for sharding: Using a single shard increases
> throughput. Have you tried with 1 >shard to see if the latency is acceptable
> for that?
The nodes were unstable when we had single shard setup. It used to run OOM
frequently. Ops team setup a cronjob to clear ou
Hi,
I am creating an explanation of solrconfig.xml for the beginners and
want to know whether anybody is actually using overrides and
initParams in the wild. Sometimes, features exist for edge cases, but
may not be worth spending much attention on in the beginner docs.
Any feedback (on the list o
I believe the shard state is a reflection of whether that shard is still in use
by the collection, and has nothing to do with the state of the replicas. I
think doing a split-shard operation would create two new shards, and mark the
old one as inactive, for example.
On 2/26/16, 8:50 AM, "De
When using nested queries of the form q=_query_:"my_awesome:query", what
needs to be escaped in the query portion? Just using the admin UI the
following works
_query_:"+field\\:with\\:special"
_query_:"+field\\:with\\~special"
_query_:"+field\\:with\\&special"
but the same doesn't work for quote
Azazel K wrote:
> We have solr cluster with 2 shards running 2 nodes on each shard.
> They are beefy physical boxes with index size of 162 GB , RAM of
> about 96 GB and around 153M documents.
There is a non-trivial overhead for sharding: Using a single shard increases
throughput. Have you tried
On behalf of the development community, I am pleased to announce the
release of YCSB 0.7.0.
Highlights:
* GemFire binding replaced with Apache Geode (incubating) binding
* Apache Solr binding was added
* OrientDB binding improvements
* HBase Kerberos support and use single connection
* Accumulo i
Thanks Walter, I've tried this earlier and it works. But the problem in my
case is that I've boosting on few Source parameters as well. My ideal "bq"
should like this:
*bq=Source:simplecontent^10 Source:Help^20 (*:*
-ContentGroup-local:("Developer"))^99*
But this is not going to work.
I'm wo
Hi,
We have solr cluster with 2 shards running 2 nodes on each shard. They are
beefy physical boxes with index size of 162 GB , RAM of about 96 GB and around
153M documents.
Two times this week we have seen the thread usage spike from the usual 1000 to
4000 on all nodes at the same time and
On 2/26/2016 9:22 AM, Merlin Morgenstern wrote:
> during the nutch run there are no activites inside the logfile as it seems.
Are you looking at the actual *logfile*, or the "Logging" tab in the
admin UI? The Logging tab will only show you entries that are at least
WARN severity. Most of what So
In clusterstate.json (or just state.json in new versions) I'm seeing the
following
"shard1":{
"range":"8000-d554",
"state":"active",
"replicas":{
"core_node7":{
"core":"people_shard1_replica3",
"base_url":"http://192.168.2.32:8983/solr";,
"node_nam
On 2/26/2016 9:22 AM, Merlin Morgenstern wrote:
> during the nutch run there are no activites inside the logfile as it seems.
> However the logfile from the admin interface shows the following:
>
> 2/26/2016, 5:20:04 PM WARN null SolrConfig Couldn't add files from
> /usr/local/Cellar/solr/5.4.1/con
during the nutch run there are no activites inside the logfile as it seems.
However the logfile from the admin interface shows the following:
2/26/2016, 5:20:04 PM WARN null SolrConfig Couldn't add files from
/usr/local/Cellar/solr/5.4.1/contrib/extraction/lib filtered by .*\.jar to
classpath: /us
On 2/26/2016 8:34 AM, Merlin Morgenstern wrote:
> Unfortunatelly no documents get added to solr and no error log entries show
> up. It seems as it would be working, but the documents are not there.
Is there anything happening in the Solr logfile at all during the nutch
run? I'm talking about any
I have nutch 1.11 installed together with solr 4.10.4 AND solr 5.4.1 on OS
X 10.11.
Nutch and Solr seem to work as nutch starts to index and solr shows the
admin interface together with the configured core.
Unfortunatelly no documents get added to solr and no error log entries show
up. It seems a
Thanks Jan,
That worked.
Kind Regards,
Marc
On 02/26/2016 01:43 PM, Jan Høydahl wrote:
Hi
Try this instead
/solr/de/update?stream.body=last_seen:[* TO
2016-02-24T00:00:00Z]&commit=true
…that is if you have streaming enabled in solrconfig. Else do a POST instead
Note that I put a commit=tru
On 2/26/2016 7:48 AM, Prateek Jain J wrote:
> WARN - 2016-02-26 05:49:29.191; org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore; [cm_history]
> WARNING: Solr index directory '/foo/solr/cm_history/data/index/' is locked.
> Unlocking...
> WARN - 2016-02-26 05:49:29.680; org.apache.solr.rest.ManagedResource; No
> s
Could you share your actual numbers and test case? IOW, the document score
without ^0.01 and with ^0.01.
Again, to repeat, the specific boost factor may be positive, but the effect
of a fractional boost is to reduce, not add, to the score, so that a score
of 0.5 boosted by 0.1 would become 0.05. I
Hi All,
We are seeing an issue with solr where solr is failing to initialize the cores
with the following errors. We have gone through the solr documentation on these
errors and its mentioned that this could happen when solr is running in
clustered mode. But in our case solr is deployed in 2N-
I posted this to http://localhost:8983/solr/default-collection/update and
it treated it like I was adding a whole document, not a partial update:
{
"id": "0be0daa1-a6ee-46d0-ba05-717a9c6ae283",
"tags": {
"add": [ "news article" ]
}
}
In the logs, I found this:
2016-02-26 14:0
Hi
Try this instead
/solr/de/update?stream.body=last_seen:[* TO
2016-02-24T00:00:00Z]&commit=true
…that is if you have streaming enabled in solrconfig. Else do a POST instead
Note that I put a commit=true at the end, so you will see the changes
immediately.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution arch
not that i'm aware of. i think you could also simply have q=field1:value
field2:value in which the OR is implied
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams Ave
Evansville, IN 47713
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Aurélien MAZ
Hi,
I think both the two queries are rewrited to the same query. You can use
the debugQuery=on parameter to see how the query is rewrited and then
compare if you get the same result for each query.
Regards,
Aurélien
Le 26/02/2016 14:27, vitaly bulgakov a écrit :
Is there a difference when
Is there a difference when we put query in brackets?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Is-it-different-q-field1-value1-OR-field2-value2-and-q-field1-value1-OR-field2-value2-tp4259976.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
I'm trying to delete by query using the following:
/solr/de/update?last_seen:[* TO
2016-02-24T00:00:00.00Z]
/solr/de/select?q=last_seen:[* TO 2016-02-24T00:00:00.00Z] returns the
correct documents to be deleted.
Last time I attempted this using the above I somehow managed to delete
al
Hi Jack,
I just checked on 5.5 and 0.1 is positive boost.
Regards,
Emir
On 26.02.2016 01:11, Jack Krupansky wrote:
0.1 is a fractional boost - all intra-query boosts are multiplicative, not
additive, so term^0.1 reduces the term by 90%.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:29 AM, sham
33 matches
Mail list logo
