Indexing will happen on everything.
Just use the copy fields to return data. That's it. They do not need to be
indexed just stored.
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016, 12:52 Anil wrote:
> Thanks Binoy.
>
> index should happen on everything.
>
> But retrial/fetch should limit the characters. is it possible ?
>
Hi,
Due to some mis-configuration issues, I have a field that has values as
single string and an array of strings. Looks like there are some old values
that got indexed as an array of strings while anything new are single
valued string. I have checked the configuration and multivalued for that
fie
Thanks Binoy.
index should happen on everything.
But retrial/fetch should limit the characters. is it possible ?
Regards,
Anil
On 18 February 2016 at 12:24, Binoy Dalal wrote:
> If you are not particular about what part of the field is returned you can
> create copy fields and set a limit on
Can someone please help me with this?
I am stuck for past few days.
> On 15-Feb-2016, at 6:39 PM, Neeraj Lajpal wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I recently asked this question on stackoverflow:
>
> I am trying to access a field in custom request handler. I am accessing it
> like this for each document:
>
Hi Colin,
As per when I last checked, DIH works with SolrCloud but has it's
limitations. It was designed for the non-cloud mode and is single threaded.
It runs on whatever node you set it up on and that node might not host the
leader for the shard a document belongs to, adding an extra hop for tho
If you are not particular about what part of the field is returned you can
create copy fields and set a limit on those to store only the number of
characters you want.
This will copy over the first 500 chars of the contents of your SRC field
to your dest field.
Anything beyond this will be trunc
I just set up a SolrCloud instance with 2 Solr nodes & another machine running
zookeeper.
I’ve imported 200M records from a SQL Server database, and those records are
split nicely between the 2 nodes. Everything seems ok.
I did the data import via the admin ui. It took not quite 8 hours, whi
Hi ,
we have around 30 fields in solr document. and we search for text in all
fields (by creating a record field with copy field).
few fields have huge text .. order of mbs. how i can get only a fragment
of fields in a configurable way.
we have to display each field content on UI. so its must t
On 2/17/2016 10:38 PM, Brian Wright wrote:
> We have a new project to use Solr. Our Solr instance will use Jetty
> rather than Tomcat. We plan to extend the Solr core system by adding
> additional classes (jar files) to the
> /opt/solr/server/solr-webapp/webapp/WEB-INF/lib directory to extend
> fea
Append &fl=
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016, 11:35 Tom Running wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am working on a project using Solr to search data from retrieved from
> Nutch.
>
> I have successfully integrated Nutch with Solr, and Solr is able to search
> Nutch's data.
>
> However I am having a bit of a problem. If I
Hello,
I am working on a project using Solr to search data from retrieved from
Nutch.
I have successfully integrated Nutch with Solr, and Solr is able to search
Nutch's data.
However I am having a bit of a problem. If I query Solr, it will bring back
the numfound and which document the query str
Hello,
We have a new project to use Solr. Our Solr instance will use Jetty
rather than Tomcat. We plan to extend the Solr core system by adding
additional classes (jar files) to the
/opt/solr/server/solr-webapp/webapp/WEB-INF/lib directory to extend
features. We also plan to run two instances
Thanks Philippe.
i am using hl.fl=*, when a field is available in highlight section, is it
possible to skip that filed in the main response ? please clarify.
Regards,
Anil
On 18 February 2016 at 08:42, Philippe Soares
wrote:
> You can put fields that you want to retrieve without highlighting i
You can put fields that you want to retrieve without highlighting in the
"fl" parameter, and the large fields in the "hl.fl" parameter. Those will
go in the highlight section only. It may also be a good idea to add
hl.requiresFieldMatch=true.
E.g. : fl=id&hl=true&hl.fl=field1,field2&hl.requireFiel
Thanks Binoy. But this may not help my usecase.
I am storing and indexing huge documents in solr. when no search text
matches with that filed text, i should skip that field of the document.
when match exists, it should be part of highlight section.
fl may not be right option in my case.
Any sugg
That's a bummer.
Anyhow I'll give it a shot and update this thread if I get anywhere.
Thanks for your help.
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016, 04:30 Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 2/17/2016 11:37 AM, Binoy Dalal wrote:
> > At my project, we aren't that big on directory and user set up but the
> fact
> > that servi
On 2/17/2016 3:49 PM, Mark Robinson wrote:
> I have around 121 fields out of which 12 of them are indexed and almost all
> 121 are stored.
> Average size of a doc is 10KB.
>
> I was checking for start=0, rows=1000.
> We were querying a Solr instance which was on another server and I think
> network
Hi,
Is there an efficient way to hit solr for complex time consuming queries?
I have a requirement where I need to pivot on 4 fields. Two fields contain
facet values close to 50. And the other 2 fields have 5000 and 8000 values.
Pivoting on the 4 fields would crash the server.
Is there a better
On 2/17/2016 11:37 AM, Binoy Dalal wrote:
> At my project, we aren't that big on directory and user set up but the fact
> that services can be started and stopped automatically on server reboots
> and ensuring single running copies of the service is of significance.
> Now currently we are running S
Ahh, makes sense. I did have a feeling I was barking up the wrong tree
since it's an Extraction issue, but I thought I'd throw it out there,
anyway.
Thanks so much for the information!
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Rachel Lynn Underwood <
r.lynn.underw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is an error
Thanks Joel and Chris!
I have around 121 fields out of which 12 of them are indexed and almost all
121 are stored.
Average size of a doc is 10KB.
I was checking for start=0, rows=1000.
We were querying a Solr instance which was on another server and I think
network lag might have come into the pi
: I have a requirement where I need to retrieve 1 to 15000 records at a
: time from SOLR.
: With 20 or 100 records everything happens in milliseconds.
: When it goes to 1000, 1 it is taking more time... like even 30 seconds.
so far all you've really told us about your setup is that some
This is an error being thrown by Apache PDFBox/Tika. You're seeing it now
because Solr 4.x uses a different Tika version than Solr 3.x.
It looks like this error is thrown when you parse a PDF with Tika, and a
font in that PDF doesn't have a ToUnicode mapping.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
I actually thought seriously about whether to mention wildcard vs. range,
but... it annoys me that the Lucene and query parser folks won't fix either
PrefixQuery or the query parsers to do the right/optimal thing for
single-asterisk query. I wrote up a Jira for it years ago, but for whatever
reason
Hey NYC Apache Lucene/Solr Meetup,
Hope all is well. I wanted to follow up on my last email with some
interesting data we’ve collected from event organizers similar to NYC
Apache Lucene/Solr Meetup. Over the last 6 months more than 70% of
payments for events on SquadUP have come from a mobile dev
On 2/17/2016 1:04 PM, Aswath Srinivasan (TMS) wrote:
> I’m tyring to upconfig my config files and my synonyms.txt file is
> about 2 MB. Whenever I try to do this, I get the following expection.
> It’s either a “broken pipe” expection or the following expection. Any
> advice for me to fix it?
The d
Solrcloud does not come with any autoscaling functionality. If you want such a
thing, you’ll need to write it yourself.
https://github.com/whitepages/solrcloud_manager might be a useful head start
though, particularly the “fill” and “cleancollection” commands. I don’t do
*auto* scaling, but I d
Hi fellow Solr developers,
I'm tyring to upconfig my config files and my synonyms.txt file is about 2 MB.
Whenever I try to do this, I get the following expection. It's either a "broken
pipe" expection or the following expection. Any advice for me to fix it?
If I remove most of the synonym entr
Also are you ranking documents by score
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Joel Bernstein wrote:
> A few questions for you: What types of fields and how many fields will you
> be retrieving? What version of Solr are you using?
>
> Joel Bernstein
> http
A few questions for you: What types of fields and how many fields will you
be retrieving? What version of Solr are you using?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Mark Robinson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a requirement where I need to retrieve 1 to 15000
Hi,
We have been testing an installation of SolrCloud under some failure
scenarios, and are seeing some issues we would like to fix before putting
this into production.
Our cluster is 6 servers running Solr 5.4.1, with config stored in our
Zookeeper cluster.
Our cores currently each have a single
Hi Dan,
At my project, we aren't that big on directory and user set up but the fact
that services can be started and stopped automatically on server reboots
and ensuring single running copies of the service is of significance.
Now currently we are running Solr 4.4 but pretty soon we're going to
upg
Hi,
I have a requirement where I need to retrieve 1 to 15000 records at a
time from SOLR.
With 20 or 100 records everything happens in milliseconds.
When it goes to 1000, 1 it is taking more time... like even 30 seconds.
Will Solr be able to return 1 records at a time in less than sa
On 2/17/2016 12:34 AM, Salman Ansari wrote:
> 2) "Behind the scenes, Solr will interpret this as "all possible values for
> field" --which sounds like it would be exactly what you're looking for,
> except that if there are ten million possible values in the field
> you're searching,
> the construct
In addition you also get many advantages like you can start/stop/restart
solr using "service solr stop|start|restart" as mentioned above. You don't
need to launch solr script directly. Also the install scripts take care of
installing/setting up Solr nicely for Production environment. Even you can
Sergo,
Please provide more debug output, I want to see how query was parsed.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Sergio García Maroto
wrote:
> My debugQuery=true returns related to the NOT:
>
> 0.06755901 = (MATCH) sum of: 0.06755901 = (MATCH) MatchAllDocsQuery,
> product of: 0.06755901 = queryNor
Thanks Shawn for explaining in details.
Regarding the performance issue you mentioned, there are 2 points
1) "The [* TO *] syntax is an all-inclusive range query, which will usually be
much faster than a wildcard query."
I will take your statement for granted and let the space for people to
comme
Hi Binoy,
We are searching for both phrases and individual words
but we want that only those documents which are having phrases will come
first in the order and then the individual app.
termPositions = true is also not working in my case.
I have also removed the string type from copy fields. ki
HI,
will there be any change in the facet count in case of expand and collpase
? please clarify.
Regards,
Anil
So, running solr as a service also runs it as a process. In typical Linux
environments, (based on initscripts), a service is a process installed to meet
additional considerations:
- Putting logs in predictable places where system operators and administrators
expect to see logs - /var/logs
- P
Hi,
We are facing NPE while using distributed search (Solr version 4.7.2)
(using *shards* parameter in solr query)
Exception Trace:
ERROR - 2016-02-17 16:44:26.616; org.apache.solr.common.SolrException;
null:java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.apache.solr.response.XMLWriter.writeSolrDocument(XM
Hello everyone,
I've read about running solr as a service but I don't understand what it
really means.
I went through the "Taking solr to production" documentation on the wiki
which suggests that solr be installed using the script provided and run as
a service.
>From what I could glean, the script
42 matches
Mail list logo
