OK, you want to get to a go/no-go decision fast. It's actually
relatively cheap to do
Here's the long form:
https://lucidworks.com/blog/2012/07/23/sizing-hardware-in-the-abstract-why-we-dont-have-a-definitive-answer/
The short form is: Take your best stab at a schema. Take your best
stab at a
See what happens if you simply index the cross product of all three tables.
if user U1 reviews restaurant R1 with review rev1, index a single Solr
document with all three. Presumably your database has a primary key
for each table, so the uniqueKey for the Solr index is the
concatenation of those t
Hello Max,
pls try &facet.field={!key=price_all
ex=fqCol}price&facet.field={!key=price_nogreen}price...
Filter exclusions aren't claimed as a feature of json facets, feel free to
raise an issue.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 8:56 PM, Aigner, Max
wrote:
> I'm currently evaluating Solr 5.3.1 for perfor
Thanks you for replying me,
one more question,
if join is bad idea at the time of indexing,or i should denormalize data.
How i can index/post Restuarnt,user,review table info to solr.
we need a unique key at the posting data to solr.
Actually i need a unique key for all table(data) for the pur
I hope I am in the context of this mailing list,
Thanks in advance.
A little background
I learned computers with 6800 machine assembly. With decades of RDBMS
jumping into the Solr/Hadoop/Hbase is still a pilgrimage through hell. I
think I didn't need to learn hadoop or hbase.
So, I have a perso
Hello Istvan,
- when flattern subdocs, you can concatenate its' fields which are
necessary for retrieval, eg "K-06-45", it solves retrieval, but isn't
really flexible.
- term positions is not easier to implement, if you really prefer this way
I'd suggest to look on http://siren.solutions/siren/ove
bq: I don't suppose there is an ETA for 5.4?
Actually, 5.4 is probably in the works within the next month. I'm not
the one cutting the
release, but there's some rumors that a label will be cut this week,
then the "usual"
process is a week or two (sometimes more if bugs are flushed out) before the
Thanks for the reply,
I don't suppose there is an ETA for 5.4?
Thanks again
-Original Message-
From: Anshum Gupta [mailto:ans...@anshumgupta.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 12:31 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Re:Re: Implementing security.json is breaking ADDREPL
Oliver:
It's really got to be some kind of oddity in your environment. It's,
shall we say, highly unlikely that this is a fundamental problem in the
code and you're the _only_ one it's affected.
Best,
Erick
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 3:21 AM, Upayavira wrote:
> Can you confirm that the indexes *ar
Not quite an answer, but the question is wrong ;)
Do not try to treat Solr like a RDBMS. Your problem
statement reveals that you are. Then, no doubt, you'll
want to join the "tables" you've indexed. Then you'll
discover that this is usually a Bad Idea.
Instead, try to flatten (denormalize) the da
I'm currently evaluating Solr 5.3.1 for performance improvements with faceting.
However, I'm unable to get the 'exclude-tagged-filters' feature to work. A lot
of the queries I'm doing are in the format
...?q=category:123&fq={!tag=fqCol}color:green&facet=true&facet.field{!key=price_all
ex=fqCol}p
On 11/24/2015 9:31 AM, Alessandro Benedetti wrote:
> I was wondering how can I escape the '*' character to explicitly look for
> it instead of using it as a wildcard.
> *rawquerystring*": "a\\*b",
> "*querystring*": "a\\*b",
> "*parsedquery*": "BoostedQuery(boost(+((area:a area:b) |
> ((country
Yes, it certainly is a PKI issue.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 7:59 AM, Oakley, Craig (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] <
craig.oak...@nih.gov> wrote:
> Thank you for the reply
>
> Trying those exact commands, I'm still getting the same issue
> tar xvzf /net/sybdev11/export/home/sybase/Distr/Solr/solr-5.3.1.tgz
> ta
Thank you for the reply
Trying those exact commands, I'm still getting the same issue
tar xvzf /net/sybdev11/export/home/sybase/Distr/Solr/solr-5.3.1.tgz
tar xvzf /net/sybdev11/export/home/sybase/Distr/Solr/zookeeper-3.4.6.tar.gz
cd zookeeper-3.4.6/
bin/zkServer.sh start zoo_sample.cfg
cd ..
sol
Hi guys,
I was wondering how can I escape the '*' character to explicitly look for
it instead of using it as a wildcard.
I was trying escaping :
*Edismax*
*q*= a\*b
which resulted in :
*rawquerystring*": "a\\*b",
"*querystring*": "a\\*b",
"*parsedquery*": "BoostedQuery(boost(+((area:a area:b)
Hi,
I implemented a Similarity which is based on the DefaultSimilarity changing
the calculation for the idf.
To work with this CustomSimilarity and the DefaultSimilarity from our
application I have one field with the default and a copyfield with my
similarity.
Concerning the extra space needed for
Mikahil, Yonik
thanks for having a look. This was my bad all the time...I forgot I was on
5.2.1 instead of 5.3.1 on this setup!! It seems some things were not there
yet on 5.2.1, I just upgraded to 5.3.1 and my query works perfectly.
Although I do agree with Mikhail the docs on this feature are a
Thank you. Just wanted to double check.
Philippa
From: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
Sent: 24 November 2015 13:48
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr Collections Migrate statement
Hi Philippa,
This is the expected behavior. The old documents stay
Hi Philippa,
This is the expected behavior. The old documents stay on the source
collection so you can verify the result of the migrate and delete them
yourself.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 6:01 PM, philippa griggs
wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I'm using Solr 5.2.1 and Zookeeper 3.4.6.
>
>
> I have a quick
Salary would normally be a numeric field, with no tokenization or filtering.
For a range query on a non-numeric field the ordering will be lexical on
individual terms, and typically Chinese text is tokenized into
two-character terms. Sure, you can technically do a range query like that,
but I'm no
The primary recommendation is that you flatten nested documents.
That means one Solr document per cpc, not multivalued.
As always, queries should drive your data model, so please specify what a
typical query might be like, in plain English.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 4:39 AM, Ist
After several days running some use cases with 2 configurations, I can tell
you that the "PERFORMANCE WARNING: Overlapping onDeckSearchers" continues
only on the maxWarmingSearchers=2 and none on the maxWarmingSearchers=5
config.
Unfortunately, the root problem still occurs!
I have reduced the fil
Thanks Mikhali.
On 23/11/15 17:44, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
Novin,
As it's stated here http://yonik.com/solr-nested-objects/ there is no
requirements for schema. Perhaps
http://blog.griddynamics.com/2013/09/solr-block-join-support.html might be
useful too.
I suppose LogUpdateProcessor messages
Hello,
I'm using Solr 5.2.1 and Zookeeper 3.4.6.
I have a quick question about the Solr Collection API and the migrate statement.
I've got a test environment working with two shards and two collections. When I
run the Migrate command the documents appear on the target collection no
problem,
Hello,
I have a 3 table Restuarnt,User,Review
Structure like this
Restuarnt--: [rid,name,etc]
User-- -- : [uid,name,etc]
Review --: [id,rid,uid,name,etc]
how i index these structure ?
Actually i am confuse about unique key ,Is i have to indexed 3 different
core for this or make a single en
Hi all,
I would like to find documents in a key-value store (Riak) with Solr and I
am running into a challenge. I have nested JSON documents with patent
information. Patents have a one or many CPC (
http://www.cooperativepatentclassification.org/index.html) codes something
like these:
{
// more
I have a requirement where I need to be able to query on a field (say
"salary"). This field contains data in Chinese.
Is it possible in Solr to do a range query on this field? Is there any
language specific Analyzer that I could use on this field to achieve range
search?
27 matches
Mail list logo
