Hi Tim,
Should we remove the console appender by default? This is very trappy I guess.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:39 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
> You should fix your log4j.properties file to no log to console ...
> it's there for the initial getting started experience, but you don't
> need to sen
On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 10:17 +0200, Jan Høydahl wrote:
> I have not benchmarked various number of segments at different sizes
> on different HW etc, so my hunch could very well be wrong for Salman’s case.
> I don’t know how frequent updates there is to his data either.
>
> Have you done #segments b
｛！join fromIndex=parent from=id to=parent_id｝tag:hoge
That should work.
On Oct 22, 2015 12:35 PM, "Shuhei Suzuki" wrote:
> hello,
> What can I do to throw a query such as the following in Solr?
>
> SELECT
> child. *, parent. *
> FROM child
> JOIN parent
> WHERE child.parent_id = parent.id
hello,
What can I do to throw a query such as the following in Solr?
SELECT
child. *, parent. *
FROM child
JOIN parent
WHERE child.parent_id = parent.id AND parent.tag = 'hoge'`
child and parent is not that parent is more than in a many-to-one
relationship.
I try this but can not.
/select
HI,
I am having difficulty in indexing multiple entity in one
collection..When i try to index only the entity defined at last gets
index..Please help to assist as I am getting hard time to solve it.
The below are the config :
--
data-config.xml
--
Thank you Shawn, Timothy, Emir and Rajani.
Sorry, Shawn, I ended up cropping out the legend but you were right on
your guess.
Indeed, Timothy, this log is completely redundant. Will get rid of it soon.
I'll look into the resources you all pointed out. Thanks!
Best,
Eric Torti
On Wed, Oct 21,
This details in this link[1] might be of help.
[1]https://support.lucidworks.com/hc/en-us/articles/207072137
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:42 AM, Emir Arnautovic <
emir.arnauto...@sematext.com> wrote:
> Hi Eric,
> As Shawn explained, memory is freed because it was used to cache portion
> of log file
To chime in, in certain cases the memory requirements for 4x (and 5x) are _much_
improved, see:
https://lucidworks.com/blog/2012/04/06/memory-comparisons-between-solr-3x-and-trunk/
But as Shawn says, it's not a magic bullet.
Solr 5 requires Java 7, so that's one thing to be aware of. Plus, you
e
On 10/21/2015 12:41 PM, Robert Hume wrote:
> I've inherited a project that uses a Solr 3.6.0 deployment. (Several
> masters and several slaves – I think there are 6 Solr instances in total.)
>
> I've been tasked with investigating if upgrading our 3.6.0 deployment will
> improve performance – the
Hello, I'm hoping to get some quick advice from the Solr gurus out there ...
I’ve inherited a project that uses a Solr 3.6.0 deployment. (Several
masters and several slaves – I think there are 6 Solr instances in total.)
I’ve been tasked with investigating if upgrading our 3.6.0 deployment
Hmmm, not entirely sure. It's perfectly reasonable to use the core
admin API, just
be careful with it especially for things like reload, it's pretty easy
to have your cluster
in an inconsistent state.
Looks like the collections RELOAD command sends requests out all
replicas at once.
Under the cov
regexp will match the whole term. So, if you have stemming on, magnetic
may well stem to magnet, and that is the term against which the regexp
is executed.
If you want to do the regexp against the whole field, then you need to
do it against a string version of that field.
The process of using a r
Hi Wunder,
Yes I can reload the documents it takes max 2-3 hours. I have never used the
update request proccessor but I will check it on the Solr Wiki. Thanks your help
Cheers,
Roland
2015. okt. 21. dátummal, 17:25 időpontban Walter Underwood
írta:
> Can you reload all the content?
>
> I
title:/magnet.?/ doesn't work for me because solr answers:
|title = "Magnetic folding system"|
but thanks to give me the idea to use regexp !!!
Le 21/10/2015 18:46, Upayavira a écrit :
No, you cannot tell Solr to handle wildcards differently. However, you
can use regular expressions for search
No, you cannot tell Solr to handle wildcards differently. However, you
can use regular expressions for searching:
title:/magnet.?/ should do it.
Upayavira
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015, at 11:35 AM, Bruno Mannina wrote:
> Dear Solr-user,
>
> I'm surprise to see in my SOLR 5.0 that the wildward ? replace
Dear Solr-user,
I'm surprise to see in my SOLR 5.0 that the wildward ? replace
inevitably 1 character.
my request is:
title:magnet? AND tire?
SOLR found only title with a character after magnet and tire but don't
found
title with only magnet AND tire
Do you know where can I tell to solr tha
Does the collection reload do a rolling reload of each node or does it do them
all at once? We were planning on using the core reload on each system, one at a
time. That would make sure the collection stays available.
I read the documentation, it didn’t say anything about that.
wunder
Walter Un
Please be very careful using the core admin UI for anything related to
SolrCloud. In fact, I try to avoid using it at all.
The reason is that it is very low-level, and it is very easy to use it
incorrectly. For instance, reloading a core in a multi-replica setup
(doesnt matter whether it's several
Can you reload all the content?
If so, I would calculate this in an update request processor and put the result
in its own field.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Oct 21, 2015, at 2:53 AM, Roland Szűcs wrote:
>
> Thank Toke your qu
Hi Christian,
It seems to me that you can use range faceting to get counts.
Thanks,
Emir
--
Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management
Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
On 20.10.2015 17:05, Christian Reuschling wrote:
Hi,
we try to get the number
Susheel,
Our puppet stuff is very close to our infrastructure, using specific Netapp
volumes and such, and assuming some files come from NFS.
It is also personally embarrassing to me that we still use NIS - doh!
-Original Message-
From: Susheel Kumar [mailto:susheel2...@gmail.com]
Sent
Hi Eric,
As Shawn explained, memory is freed because it was used to cache portion
of log file.
Since you are already with Sematext, I guess you are aware, but doesn't
hurt to remind you that we also have Logsene that you can use to manage
your logs: http://sematext.com/logsene/index.html
Th
What I'd say is that there are *substantial* optimisations done already
when indexing terms, especially numerical ones, e.g. looking for common
divisors. Look out for a talk by Adrien Grand at Berlin Buzzwords
earlier this year for a taste of it.
I don't know how much of this kind of optimisation
Thanks everyone, for your answers. I will probably make a simple parametric
test pumping a solr index full of those integers with very limited range
and then sorting by vector distances to see how the performance
characteristics are.
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 9:08 PM, Mikhail Khludnev <
mkhlud...@gr
We are using aws, and standardized deployments using Chef.
As Jeff points out below, Exhibitor is a good tool to deploy with Zookeeper.
We’ve had very good luck with it.
On 10/20/15, 7:59 PM, "Jeff Wartes" wrote:
>
>If you’re using AWS, there’s this:
>https://github.com/LucidWorks/solr-sca
The DIH Cache feature does not work with delta import. Actually, much of DIH
does not work with delta import. The workaround you describe is similar to the
approach described here:
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandlerDeltaQueryViaFullImport , which
in my opinion is the best way to i
Thank Toke your quick response. All your suggestions seem to be very good idea.
I found the capital letters also strange because of the names, places so I will
skip this part as I do not need an absolute measure just a ranked order among
my documents,
cheers,
Roland
2015. okt. 21. dátummal,
Roland Szűcs wrote:
> My use case is that I have to calculate the LIX readability index for my
> documents.
[...]
> *B* = Number of periods (defined by period, colon or capital first letter)
[...]
> Does anybody have idea how to get the number of "periods"?
As the positions does not matter, you c
Hi all,
My use case is that I have to calculate the LIX readability index for my
documents.
*LIX = A/B + (C x 100)/A*, where
*A* = Number of words
*B* = Number of periods (defined by period, colon or capital first letter)
*C* = Number of long words (More than 6 letters)
A can easily be done if
Mikhail,
I solved the problem, I putfile to wrong path. /synonyms.txt should be
/configs/gettingstarted/synonyms.txt .
Regards,
Hangu
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Hangu Choi wrote:
> Mikhail,
>
> I didn't understatnd that's what I need to do. thank you.
>
> but at the first moment, I am n
Mikhail,
I didn't understatnd that's what I need to do. thank you.
but at the first moment, I am not doing well..
I am testing to change configuration in solrcloud, through this command
./zkcli.sh -zkhost localhost:9983 -cmd putfile /synonyms.txt
/usr/local/solr-5.3.1-test/server/scripts/cloud-s
31 matches
Mail list logo
