Hello,
the background for my question is that one of the requirements for our
injection tool is that it should report that a new document has been
successfully enrolled to the cluster only if it is available on all replicas.
The automated integration test for this feature will submit a document
Hi Adrian,
The main Solr is able to startup, but the cores cannot be loaded. I can get
to the admin page once in a while (not always the case), and if I can get
there, it will says there's no cores available. Otherwise, the browser will
just say "This page can't be displayed".
If I use the URL to
Hi,
I am trying to implement some scripting to detect if all Zookeepers have
started in a cluster, then restart the solr servers. Has anyone achieved this
yet through scripting?
I also saw there is the ZookeeperClient that is available in .NET via a nuget
package. Not sure if this could be als
Hi Edwin,
Solr 5.3.0 seems to be working for me using NSSM. I am operating on a Windows
Server 2012.
I did put start -f -p 8983. Are you getting errors? Is Solr not starting up?
Best regards,
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo [mailto:edwinye...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thu
Hi Anders,
Yes, I did put the -f param for running it in foreground.
I put start -f -p 8983 in the Arugments parameters in NSSM service
installer.
Is that the correct place to put for Solr 5.3.0? I did the same way for
Solr 5.1 and it was working then. I'm using Windows 8.1.
Regards,
Edwin
On
Hi,
I am trying to implement some scripting to detect if all Zookeepers have
started in a cluster, then restart the solr servers. Has anyone achieved this
yet through scripting?
I also saw there is the ZookeeperClient that is available in .NET via a nuget
package. Not sure if this could be als
Thank you Erick. Yes it was the default search field.
So for the following SellerName:
1) cardinal healthcare products
2) cardinal healthcare
3) postoperative cardinal healthcare
4) surgical cardinal products
My requirement is:
q=SellerName:cardinal - all 4 records returned
q=SellerName:healthca
Steve,
/You could achieve what you want by copying to another field and defining a
separate analyzer for each. One would create shingles, and the other edge
ngrams. /
Could you please elaborate this. I am not sure I understand how to do it by
using copyField.
--
View this message in context
Yes, you are right about that - I've used pivots before and they do need to
be used judiciously.
Fortunately, we only ever use single-value fields, as it gives some good
advantages in a heavily sharded environment.
Our document structure is, by it's very nature always flat, so it could be
an impedi
Hi,
Analyzers must have exactly one tokenizer, no more and no less.
You could achieve what you want by copying to another field and defining a
separate analyzer for each. One would create shingles, and the other edge
ngrams.
Steve
> On Oct 14, 2015, at 11:58 AM, vit wrote:
>
> I have Sol
Actually what you mentioned Alessandro is something interesting for me. I
am looking to boost the ranking of some suggestions based on some dynamic
criteria (let's say how frequent they are used). Do I need to update the
boost field each time I request the suggestion (to capture the frequency)?
If
You may want to start solr with following settings to enable logging GC
details. Here are some flags you might want to enable.
-Xloggc:/gc.log
-XX:+PrintGCDetails
-XX:+PrintGCDateStamps
-XX:+PrintGCTimeStamps
-XX:+PrintTenuringDistribution
-XX:+PrintGCApplicationStoppedTime
-XX:+PrintHeapAtGC
Onc
bq: They are definetly cached. The second time runs in no time.
That's not what I was referring to. Submitting the same query
over will certainly hit the queryResultCache and return in
almost no time.
What I meant was do things like vary the fq clause you have
where you've set cache=false. Or var
try adding &debug=true to your query. The query
q=SellerName:cardinal he
actually parses as
q=SellerName:cardinal defaultSearchField:he
so I suspect you're getting on the default search field.
I'm not sure EdgeNGram is what you want here though.
That only grams individual tokens, so CARDINAL is g
I have the following fieldtype in my schema:
and the following field:
With the following data:
SellerName:CARDINAL HEALTH
When I do the following search
q:SellerName:cardinal
I get back the results with SellerName: CARDINAL HEALTH (correct)
or I do the search
q:SellerName:
On 14 October 2015 at 18:18, Pushkar Raste wrote:
> Consider
> 1. Turning on docValues for fields you are sorting, faceting on. This will
> require to reindex your data
>
Yes. I am considering doing this.
> 2. Try using TrieInt type field you are trying to do range search on (you
> may have to
<>
"debug": { "rawquerystring": "*:*", "querystring": "*:*", "parsedquery":
"(+MatchAllDocsQuery(*:*))/no_coord", "parsedquery_toString": "+*:*", "
explain": { "Product:47047358": "\n1.0 = (MATCH) MatchAllDocsQuery, product
of:\n 1.0 = queryNorm\n", "Product:3223": "\n1.0 = (MATCH)
MatchAllDoc
Consider
1. Turning on docValues for fields you are sorting, faceting on. This will
require to reindex your data
2. Try using TrieInt type field you are trying to do range search on (you
may have to fiddle with precisoinStep) to balance index size vs performance.
3. If slowness is intermittent - tu
I’m aware of two public administration tools:
This was announced to the list just recently:
https://github.com/bloomreach/solrcloud-haft
And I’ve been working in this:
https://github.com/whitepages/solrcloud_manager
Both of these hook the Solrcloud client’s ZK access to inspect the cluster
state
I have Solr 4.2
I need to do the following:
1. white space tokenize
2. create shingles
3. use EdgeNGramFilter for each word in shingles, but not in a shingle as a
string
So can I do this?
* *
* *
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Can-I-use-tokenizer-twice
Did you add the f param for running it in foreground?
I noticed that the Solr service was restarted indefinetly when running it
as a background service.
its also needed to stop the windows service.
This test worked well here (on Windows 2012):
REM Test for running solr 5.3.1 as a windows service
bq: If a timeout between shard leader and replica can
lead to a smaller rf value (because replication has
timed out), is it possible to increase this timeout in the configuration?
Why do you care? If it timed out, then the follower will
no longer be active and will not serve queries. The Cloud vie
Hi all,
We're helping to run an event in Cambridge UK next year which will be an
open workshop on search for bioinformatics:
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbe/about/events/open-source-search-bioinformatics
Do please spread the word to anyone working with biological data and
open source search! It's li
Hi Lorenzo,
Can you provide which solr version you are using, index size on disks &
hardware config (memory/processor on each machine.
Thanks,
Susheel
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 6:03 AM, Lorenzo Fundaró <
lorenzo.fund...@dawandamail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have following conf for filters and co
Hi Susheel, Mikhail, Erick,
Thanks for replies.
I need to learn more.
Regards,
Prasanna.
-Original Message-
From: Susheel Kumar [mailto:susheel2...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 12:54 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to formulate query
Hi Prassana, Thi
A couple of things don't particularly make sense here:
You specify edismax, q=*:* yet you specify qf=
You're searching across whatever you defined as the default
field in the request handler. What do you see if you attach
&debug=true to the query?
I think this clause is wrong:
(cents_ri: [* 3000]
Hello,
I have following conf for filters and commits :
Concurrent LFU Cache(maxSize=64, initialSize=64, minSize=57,
acceptableSize=60, cleanupThread=false, timeDecay=true, autowarmCount=8,
regenerator=org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher$2@169ee0fd)
${solr.autoCommit.max
ahahah absolutely not, you don't sound dumb.
You need only a basic knowledge of how Lucene manage IndexReaders and
IndexSearchers.
On 14 October 2015 at 09:08, Yewint Ko wrote:
> Thank Ales and Tommaso for your replies
>
> So, is it like the classifier query the whole index db and load onto mem
using the suggester feature you can in some case rank the suggestions based
on an additional numeric field.
It's not your use case, you actually want to use a search handler with a
well defined schema that will allow you for example to query on an edge
ngram token filtered field, applying a geo dis
mmm let's say that nested facets are a subset of Pivot Facets.
if pivot faceting works with the classic flat document structure, the sub
facet are working with any nested structure.
So be careful about pivot faceting in a flat document with multi valued
fields, because you lose the relation across
I have not benchmarked various number of segments at different sizes
on different HW etc, so my hunch could very well be wrong for Salman’s case.
I don’t know how frequent updates there is to his data either.
Have you done #segments benchmarking for your huge datasets?
--
Jan Høydahl, search solu
Thank Ales and Tommaso for your replies
So, is it like the classifier query the whole index db and load onto memory
first before running tokenizer against InputDocument? It sounds like if I
don't close the classifier and my index is big, i might need bigger
machine. Anyway to reverse the order? D
Thanks for your suggestion Jack. In fact we're doing geographic search
(fields are country, state, county, town, hamlet, district)
So it's difficult to split.
Best regards,
Elisabeth
2015-10-13 16:01 GMT+02:00 Jack Krupansky :
> Performing a sequence of queries can help too. For example, if
33 matches
Mail list logo
