Thanks Shawn. I accidentally copied some files from my previous version other
than my javasctipt files. You were right.
Thanks , Roland
Az iPhone-omról küldve
2015. szept. 26. dátummal, 19:00 időpontban Shawn Heisey
írta:
>> On 9/26/2015 8:31 AM, Szűcs Roland wrote:
>> I downloaded the lates
Erick...There is only one type of String
"sun.org.mozilla.javascript.internal.NativeString:" and no other variations
of that in my index, so no question of missing it. Point taken regarding
the CURSORMARK stuff, yes you are correct, my head so numb at this point
after working 3 days on this, I wasn
No need to re-install Solr, just create a new core, this time it'd probably be
easiest to use the bin/solr create_core command. In the Solr
directory just type bin/solr create_core -help to see the options.
We're pretty much trying to migrate to using bin/solr for all the maintenance
we can, but a
bq: 3. Erick, I wasnt getting all 1.4 mill in one shot. I was initially using
100 docs batch, which, I later increased to 500 docs per batch. Also it
would not be a infinite loop if I commit for each batch, right !!??
That's not the point at all. Look at the basic logic here:
You run for a while
Greetings,
Being a Solr newbie, I've run the examples in the "Solr Quick Start"
document and got a feel for Solr's capabilities. Now I want to move on
and work with my own data and my own Solr server without using the
example setup (i.e., "solr -e" options). This is where the
documentation
Erick & Shawn I incrporated your suggestions.
0. Shut off all other indexing processes.
1. As Shawn mentioned set batch size to 1.
2. Loved Erick's suggestion about not using filter at all and sort by
uniqueId and put last known uinqueId as next queries start while still
using cursor marks as
Relevant code
http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/org.apache.solr/solr-core/5.2.0/org/apache/solr/search/ValueSourceParser.java#126
On Saturday, September 26, 2015, Doug Turnbull <
dturnb...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
> I noticed a while back that "sleep" is a function query. W
I noticed a while back that "sleep" is a function query. Which I
believe means I can make the current query thread sleep for as long as I
like.
I'm guessing an attacker could use this to starve Solr of threads, running
a denial of service attack by running multiple queries with sleeps in them.
Is
Uwe,
As a workaround, can you add facet.threads=Ncores to count fields in
parallel?
Also, setting fcs method for single value fields runs per segment faceting
in parallel.
Of course, fields which has small number of terms are beneficial from enum
method.
Excuse me if it's obvious.
https://cwiki.ap
OK, a lot of dialog while I was gone for two days! I read the whole
thread, but I'm a newbie to Solr, so some of the dialog was Greek to
me. I understand the words, of course, but applying it so I know
exactly what to do without screwing something else up is the problem.
After all, that is h
Thank you Erick & Shawn for taking significant time off your weekends to
debug and explain in great detail. I will try to address the main points
from your emails to provide more situation context for better understanding
of my situation
1. Erick, As part of our upgrade from 4.7.2 to 5.3.0 I re-in
On 9/26/2015 8:31 AM, Szűcs Roland wrote:
> I downloaded the latest version of solr to my computer. When I started
> solr as a standalone proccess on the default port two strange things
> happened:
> 1. I got an error message : Failed to parse command line arguments due
> to: Unrecognized option: -
Oh, one more thing. _assuming_ you can't change the indexing process
that gets the docs from the system of record, why not just add an
update processor that does this at index time? See:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Update+Request+Processors,
in particular the StatelessScriptUpd
On 9/26/2015 10:41 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> 30
This needs to include openSearcher=false, as Erick mentioned. I'm sorry
I screwed that up:
30
false
Thanks,
Shawn
Well, let's forget the cursormark stuff for a bit.
There's no reason you should be getting all 1.4 million rows.
Presumably you've been running this program occasionally and blanking
strings like "sun.org.mozilla.javascript.internal.NativeString:" in
the uuid field. Then you turn around and run th
On 9/25/2015 10:10 PM, Ravi Solr wrote:
> thank you for taking time to help me out. Yes I was not using cursorMark, I
> will try that next. This is what I was doing, its a bit shabby coding but
> what can I say my brain was fried :-) FYI this is a side process just to
> correct a messed up string.
Ah are you having an issue with Lucene code? You might do better at
java-u...@lucene.apache.org
That being said, do you have code you can share with the list that
demonstrates your problem?
-Doug
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Gajendra Dadheech
wrote:
> Hey Doug,
>
> Thanks for reply. Detai
Hey Doug,
Thanks for reply. Details regarding my use case:
I need to query on two fields in my indexes, and will consider score only
for the one which has highest score. So i create two boolean queries [these
queries are made up of other differet tokens, so chose boolean query] on
those two fiel
Hi Gajendra
What do you mean by "behaving odd"? What odd behavior do you see?
My colleague John Berryman and I have seen many ways dismax has "behaved
odd" and we've tried to write about them (it quite often surprises me too)
http://opensourceconnections.com/blog/2013/07/02/getting-dissed-by-dis
Hi,
As i can see in solr code, DisJunctionMaxQuery extends Query, so by default
is inherits the functionaltiy. So Query class has one method called
SetBoost, this is behaving very odd when applied on a DisMax Query. Can
someone guide me regarding how calling SetBoost on a dismax query would
impact
Hi guys,
I downloaded the latest version of solr to my computer. When I started solr
as a standalone proccess on the default port two strange things happened:
1. I got an error message : Failed to parse command line arguments due to:
Unrecognized option: -maxWaitSecs. I did not use any argumet whe
Uwe,
Would you mind to provide a few details about your case?
I wonder about number of bigterms and other stats as well at 'author' field
(ant other most expensive facets). It looks like log rows:
Sep 13, 2011 2:51:53 PM org.apache.solr.request.UnInvertedField uninvert
INFO: UnInverted multi-value
22 matches
Mail list logo
