Sorry to poke this again but I'm not following the last comment of how I
could go about extending the solr index searcher and have the extension
used. Is there an example of this? Again thanks
Jamie
On Aug 25, 2015 7:18 AM, "Jamie Johnson" wrote:
> I had seen this as well, if I over wrote this
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> I don't see it explicitly mentioned, but does the boost only get applied to
> the final documents/score that matched the provided query or is it called
> for each field that matched? I'm assuming only once per document that
> matched the mai
: "Is there a way to search for documents that have a word appearing more
: than a certain number of times? For example, I want to find documents
: that only have more than 10 instances of the word "genetics" …"
Try...
q=text:genetics&fq={!frange+incl=false+l=10}termfreq('text','genetics')
No
I don't see it explicitly mentioned, but does the boost only get applied to
the final documents/score that matched the provided query or is it called
for each field that matched? I'm assuming only once per document that
matched the main query, is that right?
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Jamie
Hi there,
We have an index build on solr 5.0. We received an user question:
"Is there a way to search for documents that have a word appearing more than a
certain number of times? For example, I want to find documents that only have
more than 10 instances of the word "genetics" …"
I'm not sure
I think I found it. {!boost..} gave me what i was looking for and then a
custom collector filtered out anything that I didn't want to show.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> Are there any example implementation showing how StrDocValues works? I am
> not sure if this is th
With version 5.3 Solr have full-featured authentication and authorization
plugins that use Basic authentication and “permission rules” which are
completely driven from ZooKeeper.
So I have tried that without success follwong the info in
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Securing+So
So thanks to the tireless efforts of David Smiley and the devs at Vivid
Solutions (not to mention the various contributors that help power Solr and
Lucene) spatial search is awesome, efficient and easy. The biggest
roadblock I've run into is not having the JTS (Java Topology Suite) JAR
where Solr
NLM tends to be rather security conscious. Nothing appears terribly wrong,
but the layout of Solr doesn't include Jetty's start.ini or jetty.xml
It will have to be the detailed way -
https://wiki.eclipse.org/Jetty/Feature/JNDI#Detailed_Setup
Once I've figured it out, I'll request wiki edit per
Hello Jamie,
Check here
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/7f721a1f9323a85ce2b5b35e12b4788c31271b69/lucene/sandbox/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/DocValuesRangeQuery.java#L185
Note, SortedSet works there even if an actual field is multivalue=false
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Jami
Hi, I'm using solr and I'm starting to index my database. I work for a book
seller, but we have a lot of different publications (i.e: different
editions from different publishers ) for the same book, and I was wondering
if it would be wise to model this "schema" using a hierarchical approach
(with
Darren,
This sounds like solution I'm looking for. Especially nice fix for the
Sunday-Monday problem.
Never worked with spatial search before, so any pointers are welcome.
Will start working on this solution.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Search-opening
Are there any example implementation showing how StrDocValues works? I am
not sure if this is the right place or not, but I was thinking about having
some document level doc value that I'd like to read in a function query to
impact if the document is returned or not. Am I barking up the right tre
analysis tab does not support multi-valued fields. It only analyses a
single field value.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015, at 05:05 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> bq: my dog
> has fleas
> I wouldn't want some variant of "og ha" to match,
>
> Here's where the mysterious "positionIncrementGap" comes in. If you
Deviantcode, did you look at the referenced JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7826
Or is that irrelevant?
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 1:58 AM, deviantcode wrote:
> I run into this exact problem trying out the latest solr, [5.3.0], @Scott,
> how did you fix it?
> KR
> Hen
bq: my dog
has fleas
I wouldn't want some variant of "og ha" to match,
Here's where the mysterious "positionIncrementGap" comes in. If you
make this field "multiValued", and index this like this:
my dog
has fleas
or equivalently in SolrJ just
doc.addField("blah", "my dog");
doc.addField("blah
>From the description, this is straight forward SolrCloud where you
have replicas on the separate machines, see:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Getting+Started+with+SolrCloud
A different way of accomplishing this would be the master/slave style, see:
https://cwiki.apache.org/conf
Hi Scott,
How about having logged in as a privileged user, you to run create_core as
solr,
something like this on a Redhat env: sudo -u solr ./bin/solr create_core -c
demo
KR
Henry
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/re-New-Solr-installation-fails-to-create-co
Sorry - didn't finish my thought. I need to address querying :) So using
the above to define what's in the index your queries for a day/time become
a CONTAINS operation against the field. Let's say that the field is defined
as a location_rpt using JTS and its Spatial Factory (which supports
polygon
Simon, Thanks a lot. that is a great tool . I am trying to use it.
Great solution.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-to-index-document-with-multiple-words-phrases-and-words-permutation-tp4224919p4225425.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at
On 8/26/2015 1:11 AM, Esther Goldbraich wrote:
> We have benchmarked a set of queries on Solr 4.7.0 and 5.2.1 (with same
> data, same solrconfig.xml) and saw better query performance on Solr 4.7.0
> (5-15% better than 5.2.1, with an exception of 100% improvement for one of
> the queries ).
> Usi
Sure - and sorry for its density. I reread it and thought the same ;)
So imagine a polygon of say 1/2 mile width (I made that up) that stretches
around the equator. Let's call this a week's timeline and subdivide it into
7 blocks, one for each day. For the sake of simplicity assume it's a line
(wh
Thanks for your recommendation Toke.
Will try to ask in the carrot forum.
Regards,
Edwin
On 26 August 2015 at 18:45, Toke Eskildsen wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 15:47 +0800, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo wrote:
>
> > Now I've tried to increase the carrot.fragSize to 75 and
> > carrot.summarySnippets t
"delightfully dense" = really intriguing, but I couldn't quite
understand it - really hoping for more info
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015, at 03:49 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> Darren,
>
> That was delightfully dense. Do you think you could unpack it a bit
> more? Possibly some sample (pseudo) queries?
>
> Upay
Darren,
That was delightfully dense. Do you think you could unpack it a bit
more? Possibly some sample (pseudo) queries?
Upayavira
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015, at 03:02 PM, Darren Spehr wrote:
> If you wanted to try a spatial approach that blended times like above,
> you
> could try a polygon of minim
If you wanted to try a spatial approach that blended times like above, you
could try a polygon of minimum width that spans the globe - this is
literally using spatial search (geocodes) against time. So in this scenario
you logically subdivide the polygon into 7 distinct regions (for days) and
then
Hi,
I want to connect two solrcloud server. and sync there indexes to each
other so that is any server is down we can work with other and whenever
I update or add index in any server the other also get updated.
shahper
im looking at the clusterstate.json t see why it is doing this I really
dont understand it though...
{"collection1":{
"shards":{
"shard1":{
"range":"8000-",
"state":"active",
"replicas":{
"core_node1":{
"state":"active",
Hi,
So i got the shards too split. But they are very unbalanced.
7204922 total docs on the original collection
shard1_0 numdocs 3661699
shard1_1 numdocs 3543132
shard2_0 numdocs 0
shard2_1 numdcs 0
Any ideas?
This is what i had to do to get this to split with the custom libs
I got shard
On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 15:47 +0800, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo wrote:
> Now I've tried to increase the carrot.fragSize to 75 and
> carrot.summarySnippets to 2, and set the carrot.produceSummary to
> true. With this setting, I'm mostly able to get the cluster results
> back within 2 to 3 seconds when I set
Thanks again Erick, I created
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7975, though I didn't attach s
patch because my current implementation is not useful generally right now,
it meets my use case but likely would not meet others. I will try to look
about generalizing this to allow something cu
Thanks Erick.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> That should be the case.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Modassar Ather
> wrote:
> > Thanks Erick,
> >
> > I saw the link. So is it that the grouping functionality works fine in
> > distributed se
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015, at 10:17 AM, O. Klein wrote:
> Those options don't fix my problem with closing times the next morning,
> or is
> there a way to do this?
Use the spatial model, and a time window of a week. There are 10,080
minutes in a week, so you could use that as your scale.
Assuming th
On 26/08/15 00:24, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Hmmm, this sounds like a nonsensical question, but "what do you mean
> by arbitrary substring"?
>
> Because if your substrings consist of whole _tokens_, then ngramming
> is totally unnecessary (and gets in the way). Phrase queries with no slop
> fulfill
Those options don't fix my problem with closing times the next morning, or is
there a way to do this?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Search-opening-hours-tp4225250p4225354.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Yes, it´s an XY problem :)
We are making the first tests to split our shard (Solr 5.1)
The problem we have is this: the number of documents indexed in the new
shards is lower than in the original one (19814 and 19653, vs 61100), and
always the same. We have no idea why Solr is doing this. A p
I run into this exact problem trying out the latest solr, [5.3.0], @Scott,
how did you fix it?
KR
Henry
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/re-New-Solr-installation-fails-to-create-core-tp4221768p4225350.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabb
Have a look at the links that Alexandre mentioned. a somewhat non-obvious style
solution because you'd probably not think about spatial features while dealing
with opening time - but it's worth having a look.
-Stefan
On Wednesday, August 26, 2015 at 10:16 AM, O. Klein wrote:
> Thank you for
On 25/08/2015 13:21, Simer P wrote:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/32138845/what-is-the-best-approach-to-guarantee-commits-in-apache-solr
.
*Question:* How can I get "guarantee commits" with Apache SOLR where
persisting data to disk and visibility are both equally important ?
*Background:*
Sadly, it's always a problem
http://searchivarius.org/blog/how-rename-fields-solr
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Roxana Danger <
roxana.dan...@reedonline.co.uk> wrote:
> Hello,
>I have a index created with solr, and I would like to add a new
> field to all the documents of the index.
Hi David,
The route key itself is indexed, but not the hash value. Why do you need to
know and display the hash value? This seems like an XY problem to me:
http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#xyproblem
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 1:17 AM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have read in one post in the Internet that
Hello,
I have a index created with solr, and I would like to add a new
field to all the documents of the index. I suppose I could a) use an
updateRequestHandler or b) create another index importing the data from the
initial index and the data of my new field. Which could be the best
approach
Hi,
I have read in one post in the Internet that the hash Solr Cloud
calculates over the key field to send each document to a different shard
is indexed. Is this true? If true, is there any way to show this hash for
each document?
Thanks,
David
Thank you for responding.
Yonik's solution is what I had in mind. Was hoping for something more
elegant, as he said, but it will work.
The thing I haven't figured out is how to deal with closing times early
morning next day.
So it's 22:00 now and opening hours are 20:00 to 03:00
Can this be don
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015, at 10:54 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 5:02 PM, O. Klein wrote:
> > I'm trying to find the best way to search for stores that are open NOW.
>
> It's probably not the *best* way, but assuming it's currently 4:10pm,
> you could do
>
> +open:[* TO 1610] +
Hi Toke,
Thank you for the link.
I'm using Solr 5.2.1 but I think the carrot2 bundled will be slightly older
version, as I'm using the latest carrot2-workbench-3.10.3, which is only
released recently. I've changed all the settings like fragSize and
desiredCluserCountBase to be the same on both si
Hello,
We have benchmarked a set of queries on Solr 4.7.0 and 5.2.1 (with same
data, same solrconfig.xml) and saw better query performance on Solr 4.7.0
(5-15% better than 5.2.1, with an exception of 100% improvement for one of
the queries ).
Using same JVM (IBM 1.7) and JVM params.
Index's size
47 matches
Mail list logo
