On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Nagasharath wrote:
> Is there a jira logged for this issue?
* SOLR-7781: JSON Facet API: Terms facet on string/text fields with
sub-facets caused
a bug that resulted in filter cache lookup misses as well as the filter cache
exceeding it's configured size. (yon
Is there a jira logged for this issue?
Sent from my iPhone
> On 23-Jul-2015, at 11:09 pm, Nagasharath wrote:
>
> I don't have this issue.
>
> I have tried with various json facet queries and my filter cache always come
> down to the 'minsize'( never exceeds configured) with solr version 5.2.1
On 7/24/2015 3:48 PM, shamik wrote:
> Here's the part which I'm not able to understand. I've for e.g. Source A, B,
> C and D in index. Each source contains "n" number of documents. Now, out of
> these, a bunch of documents in A and B are tagged with MediaType. I took the
> following steps:
>
> 1.
Thanks Eric.
Here's the part which I'm not able to understand. I've for e.g. Source A, B,
C and D in index. Each source contains "n" number of documents. Now, out of
these, a bunch of documents in A and B are tagged with MediaType. I took the
following steps:
1. Delete all documents tagged with M
looks like there is nothing that exists in this regard and there is no jira
ticket that I could find. Is this something that there is any other
interest in? Is this something that a ticket should be created for?
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> Is there a way to conside
bq: This started when I turned on "docvalues"
You _must_ re-index completely when changing something like this, so the notion
of removing the index completely isn't really any extra work.
Here's what I'd do.
1> just create a new collection with your current schema definition
and index to _that_
SolrDispatchFilter holds CoreContainer cores, perhaps you can extend the
filter to manage it to publish cores into jndi, where core can be found in
other application, and is used for instantiating EmbeddedSolrServer.
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 9:50 PM, Darin Amos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have an appli
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 1:06 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 7/23/2015 10:55 AM, cbuxbaum wrote:
> > Say we have 100 party records. Then the child SQL will be run
> 100
> > times (once for each party record). Isn't there a way to just run the
> child
> > SQL on all of the party records at
First, I wanted to humbly thank the Solr community for their contributions
and feedback for our open source Solr sandbox, Splainer (http://splainer.io
and http://github.com/o19s/splainer). The reception and comments have been
generally positive and helpful, and I very much appreciate being part of
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015, at 07:50 PM, Darin Amos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have an application server that is running both the solr.war and a REST
> API war within the same JVM. Is it possible to query the SOLR instance
> natively (non-blocking) without connecting over HTTP? I could use
> EmbeddedSolrS
Hello,
I have an application server that is running both the solr.war and a REST API
war within the same JVM. Is it possible to query the SOLR instance natively
(non-blocking) without connecting over HTTP? I could use EmbeddedSolrServer but
I cannot create a second instance of my core.
If I ca
I didn't use the REST API, instead updated the schema manually.
Can you be specific on removing the data directory content ? I certainly
don't want to wipe out the index. I've four Solr instances, 2 shards with a
replica each. Are you suggesting clearing the index and re-indexing from
scratch ?
Hi Dale,
I would think the coffee shop is better, I have in-laws visiting at home.
Thanks
Darin
> On Jul 24, 2015, at 12:04 PM, Aki Balogh wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I'm using TermVectorComponent and stemming (Porter) in order to get term
> frequencies with fuzzy matching. I'm stemming at index
Hi All,
I'm using TermVectorComponent and stemming (Porter) in order to get term
frequencies with fuzzy matching. I'm stemming at index and query time.
Is there a way to get term frequency from the index?
* termfreq doesn't support stemming or wildcards
* terms component doesn't allow additional
Is there a way to consider payloads for scoring in phrase queries like
exists in PayloadTermQuery?
Thanks Shawn,
I actually figured out the issue while I was on my flight back home. It was a
trivial problem caused by a bad assumption. I have some classpath issues now
but those are problems I can solve.
Sorry for not including any logs, the behaviour looked like it was simply not
detecting t
Actually, Solr has been supporting Nested Objects for a little while:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Uploading+Data+with+Index+Handlers#UploadingDatawithIndexHandlers-NestedChildDocuments
The schema represents a union of all possible fields though, so yes,
some care needs to be t
What exactly do you mean by nested objects in Solr. It would help if you
give an example. The Solr schema is flat as far as I know.
Bill
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Rajesh
wrote:
> You can use nested entities like below.
>
>
> query="SELECT * FROM User">
>
You can use nested entities like below.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Nested-objects-in-Solr-tp4213212p4219039.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list a
Thank you Upayavira and Shawn. Yes - the query works correctly using
the standard select. I have a workaround where I simply specify the
fields I want to search in each part of the query and do not specify a
df. Just an FYI in case someone else runs into this.
-Joe
On 7/23/2015 10:51 AM, S
I think it's intended for
{!join fromIndex=other from=other_key to=key score=max}my_boost_value_field
thus it runs functional query, which matches all docs at "other" core with
field value 'my_boost_value_field' as a score. Then, this score is passed
through join query for other.other_key=key. Do
Hello Alessandro, i have thought about that, but in this case we do not want
more fields, just perform some additional normalization filters based on some
parameter. We need this type of index to be very low latency, and we have many
varieties. We know from experience that hundreds of fields add
Mikhail,
I've tried this out, but to be honest I can't work out what the score=
parameter is supposed to add.
I assume that if I do {!join fromIndex=other from=other_key to=key
score=max}somefield:(abc dev)
It will calculate the score for each document that has the same "key"
value, and include
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015, at 10:14 PM, Darin Amos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been trying to run the SOLR war with embedded Jetty and can’t seem
> to get the config quiet right. Is there any known documentation on this
> or is someone else doing this? I seem to just be setting up a document
> server
Yes I am fairly new to XSLT. I used the velocity response writer for some
prototypes. I found it very intuitive. But the requirement for the app
specifically rules it out and mandates the XSLT approach. I have finally got
it working. Thanks to all your help. Here's what I got (a minor correction
on
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015, at 12:53 AM, Rex X wrote:
> Given following Impala query:
>
> SELECT date, SUM(CAST(price AS DOUBLE)) AS price
> FROM table
> WHERE date='2014-01-01' AND store_id IN(1,2,3)
> GROUP BY date;
>
> To work with Solr
>
> 1. Will it be more efficient to directl
26 matches
Mail list logo
