Glad it's working out. I should have added that for a small
set of distinct terms the performance diff between
contains and prefix is probably um-measurable. If your
field has 100 distinct tokens (number from thin air) well,
computers are really fast
Best
Erick
On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 1:45 AM,
Thanks Eric for your kind help.
The field I am using is of string type and I tried escaping also, but still
facet.contains doesn't work for it.
As you said facet.contains is expensive, I tried facet.prefix in place and
it is working fine for my requirement.
Thanks again.
Thanks & Regards
--
Pri
