Thanks for the prompt reply Shawn. I've created an issue about this [1] from
the code the collection parameter is clearly ignored unless is a commit or the
UpdateParams.WAIT_SEARCHER parameter is set in the params of the request, which
is an indication of a commit/optimize.
The queue only cont
Hi, I am new to Solr and would like to find out if Solr has a spellalike
feature that can fulfill this requirement:
Searching "HAT" in the data that contains "CAT" would match.
It is similar to searching: ?AT, H?T and ?AT.
Other than querying multiple times, do you have advice on how I can optim
On 6/26/2015 2:27 PM, Jorge Luis Betancourt González wrote:
> I'm trying to use the ConcurrentUpdateSolrClient class, that has some methods
> that accept and aditional parameter to indicate the collection, some of this
> methods are add(String collection, SolrInputDocument doc),
> request(SolrRe
Hi all,
I'm trying to use the ConcurrentUpdateSolrClient class, that has some methods
that accept and aditional parameter to indicate the collection, some of this
methods are add(String collection, SolrInputDocument doc), request(SolrRequest,
String collection). With HttpSolrClient this works f
If you have a lot of content, reimporting everything every 10 minutes
will be a bad idea.
Solr uses a "write once" strategy. If you update something, it won't
just change a single field, or notice that nothing has changed, it will
simply mark the current version as deleted and insert another.
Thu
You are tokenising …
""
Be careful in doing first the lowercase token filter.
It's a best practice to first charFilter, then Tokenize and finally the set
of Token Filters.
Cheers
2015-06-26 13:27 GMT+01:00 Mike Thomsen :
> I tried creating a simplified new text field type that only did lower
> c
I tried creating a simplified new text field type that only did lower
casing and exact phrasing worked this time. I'm not sure what the problem
was. Perhaps it was a case of copypasta gone bad because I could have sworn
that I tried exact phrase matching against a simple text field with bad
results
In my schema from 4.6, the text was in the 'text' field, and the "stored"
attrib was set to "true" as it is in the 5.2 schema. I am ingesting the
text from files on the server , and it used to work just fine with 4.6. I
am using the same schema except I had to get rid the field types pint,
plong, p
Actually storing or not storing a field is a simple schema.xml
configuration.
This suggestion can be obvious, but … have you checked you have your
"stored" attribute set "true" for the field you are interested ?
I am talking about the 5.2 schema.
Cheers
2015-06-26 12:24 GMT+01:00 Mark Ehle :
>
Folks -
I am using SOLR 4.6 to run a newspaper indexing site we have at the library
I work at. I would like to update to 5.2, and I have an instance of it
running. When I go to index the txt files of each newspaper page, I can
search and find stuff, but there is no text stored any more. I do use
h
Lucene, the underlying search engine library, imposes this 32K limit for
individual terms. Use tokenized text instead.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Mike Thomsen
wrote:
> I need to be able to do exact phrase searching on some documents that are a
> few hundred kb when treat
Hi,
I wanted to run full import without clean say every 10 minutes. I was able
to do that via Solrj.I was also checking a condition that if previous import
is complete,trigger full import else skip.
The only challenge I have is everytime when full import is triggered, I want
to modify the db data
hello all
i need some best practice advice on nested categories i have a atom file
which i am going to index in solr. The file has the below categorization as
you can see below.
the first four category comparison test, honda , kia and sedan are parent
level
Then the next two Civic is a child of Ho
Up, Can anyone gently take a look to my considerations related the FreeText
Suggester ?
I am curious to have more insight.
Eventually I will deeply analyse the code to understand my errors.
Cheers
2015-06-19 11:53 GMT+01:00 Alessandro Benedetti
:
> Actually the documentation is not clear enough
I agree with David, I see a Ton of wrong configuration in yours …
Please have a read of the documentation linked .
And take a look to this mailing list, we have tons of messages related that
can help you.
A first suggestion for you anyway, is to take care of your analysis.
The suggestions will be t
I agree with Updaya,
furthermore It doesn't make any sense to try to solve a "Phrase search"
problem , not tokenising at all the text …
It's not going to work and it is fundamentally wrong to not tokenise long
textual fields if you want to do free text search in them.
Can you explain us better your
Why do you want to use the KeywordTokenizer? Why not use a text field,
and use Solr's phrase search features?
q="some phrase" will match those terms next to each other, and should be
fine with a large block of text.
Combine that with hit highlighting, and it'll return a snippet of that
block of t
Hi,
When highlighting hits for the following query:
(+Contents:apple +Contents:watch) Contents:iphone
I expect the standard solr highlighter to highlight either iphone or iphone
AND apple, only if watch is present.
However, solr highlights iphone along with only apple. Is this a bug or a
known
18 matches
Mail list logo
