Re: Solr Suggester not working.

Did you have a quick look at this blog? http://lucidworks.com/blog/solr-suggester/ On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 12:05 PM, ssharma7...@gmail.com < ssharma7...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > I am new to Solr & have installed Solr 5.1. I am trying to get the > Suggester > component working without any succe

Solr Suggester not working.

Hi, I am new to Solr & have installed Solr 5.1. I am trying to get the Suggester component working without any success, the following are the relevant details: *Schema.xml*

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Book: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, Third Edition

If you order on Packt’s site then you can save a lot with these discount codes — good thru July 30th: 30% on Print books: ASESP30 20% on Ebooks: ASESE20 https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition ~ David On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at

Exact phrase search on very large text

I need to be able to do exact phrase searching on some documents that are a few hundred kb when treated as a single block of text. I'm on 4.10.4 and it complains when I try to put something larger than 32kb in using a textfield with the keyword tokenizer as the tokenizer. Is there any way I can ind

Re: What's wrong

Hi, You're right.I've put my field in "text_general" type and i found the problem. For example, i have this like a index : london, , ,capital, , ,populous,city, ,united,kingdom When i mock like this :clauses[0] = new SpanTermQuery(new Term("details", "populous"));clauses[1] = new SpanTermQuery(ne

Re: How to do a Data sharding for data in a database table

Hi Guys, I have no problem changing it to 2. However, we are talking about two different applications. The Solr 4.7 has two applications: example and example-DIH. The application example-DIH is the one I started with since it works with database. The example-DIH has the default setting to 4. Re

Re: How to do a Data sharding for data in a database table

On 6/25/2015 10:27 AM, Wenbin Wang wrote: > To clarify the work: > > We are very early in the investigative phase, and the indexing is NOT done > continuously. > > I indexed the data once through Admin UI, and test the query. If I need to > index again, I can use curl or through the Admin UI. > > T

Re: How to do a Data sharding for data in a database table

To clarify the work: We are very early in the investigative phase, and the indexing is NOT done continuously. I indexed the data once through Admin UI, and test the query. If I need to index again, I can use curl or through the Admin UI. The Solr 4.7 seems to have a default setting of maxWarming

Re: solr 4.8.1 to 4.10.4 upgrade / luceneMatchVersion

On 6/25/2015 9:08 AM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) wrote: > We would like to upgrade from solr 4.8.1 to 4.10.4 and for existing > collections (at least initially) continue to use the 4.8 lucene format rather > than the latest 4.10 format. > > Two main reasons for the preference: > (a)

solr 4.8.1 to 4.10.4 upgrade / luceneMatchVersion

Hello. We would like to upgrade from solr 4.8.1 to 4.10.4 and for existing collections (at least initially) continue to use the 4.8 lucene format rather than the latest 4.10 format. Two main reasons for the preference: (a) no need to worry about a not-yet-upgraded 4.8 replica recovering from an

Re: How to do a Data sharding for data in a database table

You're missing the point. One of the things that can really affect response time is too-frequent commits. The fact that the commit configurations have been commented out indicate that the commits are happening either manually (curl, HTTP request or the like) _or_ you have, say, a SolrJ client that

Re: How to do a Data sharding for data in a database table

Hi Erick, The configuration is largely the default one, and I have not made much change. I am also quite new to Solr although I have a lot of experience in other search products. The whole list of fields need to be retrieved, so I do not have much of a choice. The total size of the index files is

Re: /suggest through SolrJ?

I have provided a Patch, actually i am not sure about the contribution process, i will read the documentation. Can anybody give me a feedback ? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7719 Cheers 2015-06-24 14:31 GMT+01:00 Alessandro Benedetti : > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-

Re: How to do a Data sharding for data in a database table

bq: Try not to store fields as much as possible. Why? Storing fields certainly adds lots of size to the _disk_ files, but have much less effect on memory requirements than one might think. The *.fdt and *.fdx files in your index are used for the stored data, and they're only read for the top N doc

Re: fq versus q

Side note on dates and fqs. If you're using NOW in your date expressions you may be able to re-use fqs by using "date math", see: https://lucidworks.com/blog/date-math-now-and-filter-queries/ Of course this may not be applicable in your situation... FWIW, Erick On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Sh

Re: How to do a Data sharding for data in a database table

schema.xml solrconfig.xml -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-do-a-Data-sharding-for-data-in-a-database-table-tp4212765p4213

Re: fq versus q

The tables came across corrupt, here they are (times in ms): Caches enabled: q fq delta original query28295267 w/o grouping 58325267 w/o sort on date 28293265 Caches disabled: q fq delta original query4113

Re: fq versus q

Thank you all for collaborative thinking! Ran additional benchmarks as proposed. Some results: All solr caches are enabled (queryResultCache hit ratio = 0.02): q fq {!cache=false} delta original query 28 295 267 w/o grouping 58 325 267 w/o sort on date 28 293 265 All solr caches are disabled

RE: Tokenizer and Filter Factory to index Chinese characters

You may also want to try Paoding if you have enough time to spend: https://github.com/cslinmiso/paoding-analysis -Original message- > From:Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo > Sent: Thursday 25th June 2015 11:38 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Tokenizer and Filter Factory to index Chin

Re: Tokenizer and Filter Factory to index Chinese characters

Hi, The result doesn't seems that good as well. But you're not using the HMMChineseTokenizerFactory? The output below is from the filters you've shown me. "highlighting":{ "chinese1":{ "id":["chinese1"], "title":["我国1月份的制造业产值同比仅增长0"], "content":["，但比经济师普遍预估的增长3.3％疲软得多。这也意

RE: Tokenizer and Filter Factory to index Chinese characters

Hi - we are actually using some other filters for Chinese, although they are not specialized for Chinese: -Original message- > From:Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo > Sent: Thursday 25th June 2015 11:24 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Tokenizer

Re: MappingCharFilterFactory and start and end offsets

Hi Steve, Sorry for a late reply, been quite busy. I have had afterthoughts immediately after sending the question, in line with what you said: I meant the source token start and end offset positions. When MCFF is removed, the $ disappears after ST and start and end offsets of all the terms are c

Re: Tokenizer and Filter Factory to index Chinese characters

Thank you. I've tried that, but when I do a search, it's returning much more highlighted results that what it supposed to. For example, if I enter the following query: http://localhost:8983/solr/chinese1/highlight?q=我国 I get the following results: "highlighting":{ "chinese1":{ "id":["

RE: Tokenizer and Filter Factory to index Chinese characters

Hello - you can use HMMChineseTokenizerFactory instead. http://lucene.apache.org/core/5_2_0/analyzers-smartcn/org/apache/lucene/analysis/cn/smart/HMMChineseTokenizerFactory.html -Original message- > From:Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo > Sent: Thursday 25th June 2015 11:02 > To: solr-user@lucene.apac

Tokenizer and Filter Factory to index Chinese characters

Hi, Does anyone knows what is the correct replacement for these 2 tokenizer and filter factory to index chinese into Solr? - SmartChineseSentenceTokenizerFactory - SmartChineseWordTokenFilterFactory I understand that these 2 tokenizer and filter factory are already deprecated in Solr 5.1, but I c

Re: DIH deletes cause opening of searchers

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Rudolf Grigeľ wrote: > How can I prevent opening new searcher after > every delete statement ? > comment tag in solrconfig.xml (it always help) -- Sincerely yours Mikhail Khludnev Principal Engineer, Grid Dynamics