That sounds great. Someone else here will be making the recipes, so I’ll put
him in touch with you.
As always, this is a really helpful list.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
On Jun 1, 2015, at 10:20 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>
> I have man
I have many. My SolrCloud code has the app push configs to zookeeper.
I am afk at the mo. Feel free to bug me about it!
Upayavira
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015, at 07:29 PM, Walter Underwood wrote:
> Anyone have Chef recipes they like for deploying Solr?
>
> I’d especially appreciate one for uploading
Hi,
Does anyone knows if we can derive suggestions across multiple fields?
I tried to set something like this in my field in suggest searchComponents
in solrconfig.xml, but nothing is returned. It only works when I set a
single field, and not multiple field.
suggest
org.apach
Thank you so much Alessandro.
But i do not find any difference with the quality of the clustering results
when I change the hl.fragszie to a even though I've set my
carrot.produceSummary to true.
Regards,
Edwin
On 1 June 2015 at 17:31, Alessandro Benedetti
wrote:
> Only to clarify the initi
bq: but aren't the config files supposed to be in Zookeeper
Yes, but you haven't done anything to tell Solr that the nodes you've
created are part of SolrCloud!
You're confusing, I think, core discovery with creating collections.
Basically you were pretty much OK up until step 5 (although I'm not
I followed these steps and I am unable to launch in cloud mode.
1. created / started 3 external Zookeeper hosts: zk1, zk2, zk3
2. installed Solr 5.1 as a service called solrsvc on two hosts: s1, s2
3. uploaded a configset to zk1 (solr home is /volume/solr/data)
-
yeah, I think you'd rather post it to d...@uima.apache.org .
Regards,
Tommaso
2015-05-28 15:19 GMT+02:00 hossmaa :
> Hi Tommaso
>
> Thanks for the quick reply! I have another question about using the
> Dictionary Annotator, but I guess it's better to post it separately.
>
> Cheers
> Andreea
>
>
fq={!edismax}you are welome
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 6:44 PM, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I need to parse some complicated queries that only works properly with the
> edismax query parser, in q and fq parameters. I am testing with
> defType=edismax, but it seems that this clause only affects to the q
> p
Thanks Rajesh... just trying to figure out if *logstash *is opensource and
free ?
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Rajesh Hazari
wrote:
> Logging :
>
> Just use logstash to a parse your logs for all collection and logstash
> forwarder and lumberjack at your solr replicas in your solr cloud to se
Hello everyone @ solr-user,
At Wayfair, I have implemented multiple word synonyms in a clean and
efficient way in conjunction with with a slightly modified version of the
LucidWorks' Autophrasing plugin by also tacking on a modified version of
edismax. It is not released or on use on our pu
Anyone have Chef recipes they like for deploying Solr?
I’d especially appreciate one for uploading the configs directly to a Zookeeper
ensemble.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
Logging :
Just use logstash to a parse your logs for all collection and logstash
forwarder and lumberjack at your solr replicas in your solr cloud to send
the log events to you central logstash server and send it to back to solr
(either the same or different instance) to a different collection.
Thank you!
David
De: Shawn Heisey
Para: solr-user@lucene.apache.org,
Fecha: 01/06/2015 18:53
Asunto: Re: fq and defType
On 6/1/2015 10:44 AM, david.dav...@correo.aeat.es wrote:
> I need to parse some complicated queries that only works properly with
the
> edismax query parser, in
On 6/1/2015 10:44 AM, david.dav...@correo.aeat.es wrote:
> I need to parse some complicated queries that only works properly with the
> edismax query parser, in q and fq parameters. I am testing with
> defType=edismax, but it seems that this clause only affects to the q
> parameter. Is there any
Hello,
I need to parse some complicated queries that only works properly with the
edismax query parser, in q and fq parameters. I am testing with
defType=edismax, but it seems that this clause only affects to the q
parameter. Is there any way to set edismax to the fq parameter?
Thank you very
Reset, pay attention to Erik. I didn't read it all the way through.
Erick
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> That's the whole point of having a true/false option for stored.
> Stored="true" implies that those fields are available for display to
> the user in results lists. s
Steve:
Surprisingly, the number of hits is completely irrelevant for the
memory requirements for sorting. The base memory size is, AFAIK, an
array of maxDoc ints (you can find maxDoc on the admin screen).
There's some additional overhead, but that's the base size. If you sue
DocValues, much of the
Did you happen to change the field type definition without reindexing? (it
requires reindexing to “unstore” them if they were originally stored)
If you’re seeing a field value in a document result (not facets, those are
driven by indexed terms) when stored=“false” then something is wrong and I’
On 6/1/2015 9:29 AM, Steven White wrote:
> I need to be able to sot in Solr. Obviously, I need to do this in a way
> sorting won't cause OOM when a result may contain 1000's of hits if not
> millions. Can you guide me on how I can do this? Is there a way to tell
> Solr sort top N results (discar
Hi everyone,
I need to be able to sot in Solr. Obviously, I need to do this in a way
sorting won't cause OOM when a result may contain 1000's of hits if not
millions. Can you guide me on how I can do this? Is there a way to tell
Solr sort top N results (discarding everything else) or must such
Thanks Erick!
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> For future reference, fq clauses are parsed just like the q clause;
> they can be arbitrarily complex.
> Best,
> Erick
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 5:52 AM, John Blythe wrote:
>> after further investigation it looks like the syn
For future reference, fq clauses are parsed just like the q clause;
they can be arbitrarily complex.
Best,
Erick
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 5:52 AM, John Blythe wrote:
> after further investigation it looks like the synonym i was testing against
> was only associated with one of their multiple divis
That's the whole point of having a true/false option for stored.
Stored="true" implies that those fields are available for display to
the user in results lists. stored="false" and they're not.
Best,
Erick
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 4:34 AM, Sznajder ForMailingList
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am indexing some
Attach suggester.build=true or suggester.buildAll=true to any request
to suggester to rebuild.
OR
add
buildOnStartup or buildOnCommit or buildOnOptimize to the definition
in solrConfig.
BUT:
building can be a _very_ expensive operation. For document-based
indexes, the build process
reads through _
It will be great if you can provide your valuable inputs on strategy for
logging & security...
Thanks a lot in advance...
Logging :
- Is there a way to implement logging for each cores separately.
- What will be the best strategy to log every query details (like source
IP, search query, etc.
Hi - we are using 64bit OS and 64bit JVM. The JVM settings are currently:
-
-DSTOP.KEY=solrrocks
-DSTOP.PORT=8100
-Dhost=helios
-Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true
-Djetty.port=9100
-DnumShards=27
-Dsolr.clustering.enabled=true
-Dsolr.install.dir=/opt/solr
-Dso
after further investigation it looks like the synonym i was testing against
was only associated with one of their multiple divisions (despite being the
most common name for them!). it looks like this may clear the issue up, but
thanks anyway!
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251
morning everyone,
i'm attempting to find related documents based on a manufacturer's
competitor. as such i'm querying against the 'description' field with
manufacturer1's product description but running a filter query with
manufacturer2's name against the 'mfgname' field.
one of the ways that we
Hi
I am indexing some content under "text" field.
In the schema.xml "text" field is defined as :
However, when I am looking to the documents via the UI
http://localhost:8983/solr/#/sec_600b/query
I see the text field content in the returned documents.
Do I make a mistake? Or this behavio
Lucene 5.1:
I am (also) facing
"java.lang.IllegalStateException: suggester was not built"
At the very moment no new documents seem tob e added to the index/core. Will a
reboot "sanitize" the index/core?
I (still) have
name="buildOnCommit">true
How can I tell Solr to peridoically update the s
Only to clarify the initial mail, The carrot.fragSize has nothing to do
with the number of clusters produced.
When you select to work with field summary ( you will work only on snippets
from the original content, snippets produced by the highlight of the query
in the content), the fragSize will sp
On 30/05/2015 00:30, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 5/29/2015 5:08 PM, Joseph Obernberger wrote:
Hi All - I have a lot of fields to delete, but noticed that once I
started deleting them, I quickly ran out of heap space. Is
delete-field a memory intensive operation? Should I delete one field,
wait a wh
32 matches
Mail list logo
