On 5/9/2015 8:41 PM, Bill Au wrote:
> Is the behavior of document being indexed independently on each node in a
> SolrCloud cluster new in 5.x or is that true in 4.x also?
>
> If the document is indexed independently on each node, then if I query the
> document from each node directly, a timestamp
Is the behavior of document being indexed independently on each node in a
SolrCloud cluster new in 5.x or is that true in 4.x also?
If the document is indexed independently on each node, then if I query the
document from each node directly, a timestamp could hold different values
since the documen
1> Right, shingles (and you've set max size to 3) a bazillion
possibilities, so the sky's the limit. It's usually smaller than that
since some patterns of words aren't very likely, but it's still a big
number. I'd really take a look at the terms that are actually indexed
with TermsComponent or sim
curl -g
"http://localhost:8983/solr/techproducts/query?q=*:*&json.facet={cats:{terms:{field:cat,sort:'count+asc'}}}"
Using curl with everything in the URL is definitely trickier.
Everything needs to be URL escaped. If it's not, curl will often
silently do nothing.
For example, when I had sort:'c
Hi Alexandre,
Solr & ASM is the extact poblem I'm looking to hack about with so I'm keen
to consider any code no matter how ugly or broken
Regards
Mark
On 9 May 2015 at 10:21, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
> If you only have classes/jars, use ASM. I have done this before, have some
> ugly cod
If you only have classes/jars, use ASM. I have done this before, have some
ugly code to share if you want.
If you have sources, javadoc 8 is a good way too. I am doing that now for
solr-start.com, code on Github.
Regards,
Alex
On 9 May 2015 7:09 am, "Mark" wrote:
> To answer why bytecode -
> If you used shingles
I do:
>http://lucidworks.com/blog/indexing-with-solrj/
This is more or less what I do
>2> you have a lot of garbage in your input.
>OCR is notorious for this,as are binary blobs.
What does the AutodetectParser return in case of
