HI everyone,
Does anyone have the answer for this problem :)?
I saw the document of Tika. Tika 1.7 support OCR and Solr 5.0 use Tika 1.7,
> but it looks like it does not work. Does anyone know that TIKA OCR works
> automatically with Solr or I have to change some settings?
>
>>
Trung.
> It's n
Hi Everyone,
Per this link
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Schema+API#SchemaAPI-ListFieldTypes
Solr supports REST Schema API to modify to the schema. I looked at
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/4_2_1/solr-solrj/index.html?overview-summary.html
in hope SolrJ has Java API to allow sc
I put up a complete example not too long ago that may help, see:
http://lucidworks.com/blog/end-to-end-payload-example-in-solr/
Best,
Erick
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 6:33 AM, Dmitry Kan wrote:
> Ahmet, exactly. As I have just illustrated with code, simultaneously with
> your reply. Thanks!
>
> On
Often, for small numbers of distinct types people use grouping and
have the app layer mingle them or whatever is pleasing. I think this
is different than post-processing you mention. Grouping (aka "field
collapsing") can be expensive if there are a large number of groups
but for small numbers it's
Steve:
Right, it's not exactly obvious. Bring up the admin UI, something like
http://localhost:8983/solr. From there you have to select a core in
the 'core selector' drop-down on the left side. If you're using
SolrCloud, this will have a rather strange name, but it should be easy
to identify what
: Another question I have though (which fits the subject even better):
: In the log I see many
: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: missing content stream
...
: What are possible reasons herfore?
The possible and likeley reasons are that you sent an "update" request w/o
any ContentStr
: I was under understanding that stopwords are filtered even before being
: parsed by search handler, i do have the filter in collection schema to
: filter stopwords and the analysis shows that this stopword is filtered
Generally speaking, your understanding of the order of operations for
query
On 4/24/2015 10:55 AM, Rajesh Hazari wrote:
> I was under understanding that stopwords are filtered even before
> being parsed by search handler, i do have the filter in collection
> schema to filter stopwords and the analysis shows that this stopword
> is filtered
>
> Analysis response : attached
I was under understanding that stopwords are filtered even before being
parsed by search handler, i do have the filter in collection schema to
filter stopwords and the analysis shows that this stopword is filtered
Analysis response : attached is the solr analysis json response.
[image: Inline im
Meaning this was working fine until Solr 5.0.0? I'm quite new to Solr and I
only started to use it when Solr 5.0.0 was released.
Regards,
Edwin
On 24 April 2015 at 18:20, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > So has anyone knows what i
Shawn's explanation fits better with why Websphere and Jetty might behave
differently. But something else that might be happening could be if the DHCP
negotiation causes the IP address to change from one network to another and
back.
-Original Message-
From: Steven White [mailto:swhite4
Hi Shawn,
The firewall was the first thing I looked into and after fiddling with it,
I still see the issue. But if that was the issue, why WebSphere doesn't
run into it but Jetty is? However, your point about domain / non domain
and private / public network maybe provide me with some new area to
Ticket opened: https://issues.apache.org/jira/i#browse/SOLR-7462
Thanks,
Scott
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 4/24/2015 7:16 AM, Scott Dawson wrote:
> > Should I create a JIRA ticket? (Am I allowed to?) I can provide more
> info
> > about my particular usage includin
On 4/24/2015 8:03 AM, Steven White wrote:
> This maybe a Jetty question but let me start here first.
>
> I have Solr running on my laptop and from my desktop I have no issue
> accessing it. However, if I take my laptop home and connect it to my home
> network, the next day when I connect the lapt
Hi Everyone,
This maybe a Jetty question but let me start here first.
I have Solr running on my laptop and from my desktop I have no issue
accessing it. However, if I take my laptop home and connect it to my home
network, the next day when I connect the laptop to my office network, I no
longer c
On 4/24/2015 7:16 AM, Scott Dawson wrote:
> Should I create a JIRA ticket? (Am I allowed to?) I can provide more info
> about my particular usage including a stacktrace if that's helpful. I'm
> using the new custom JSON indexing, which, by the way, is an excellent
> feature and will be of great be
Ahmet, exactly. As I have just illustrated with code, simultaneously with
your reply. Thanks!
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Ahmet Arslan
wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> I think, it is activated by PayloadTermQuery.
>
> Ahmet
>
>
>
> On Friday, April 24, 2015 2:51 PM, Dmitry Kan
> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
Answering my own question:
in order to account for payloads, PayloadTermQuery should be used instead
of TermQuery:
PayloadTermQuery payloadTermQuery = new PayloadTermQuery(new Term("body",
"dogs"), new MaxPayloadFunction());
Then in the query explanation we get:
---
Results for body:dog
Hi Dmitry,
I think, it is activated by PayloadTermQuery.
Ahmet
On Friday, April 24, 2015 2:51 PM, Dmitry Kan wrote:
Hi,
Using the approach here
http://lucidworks.com/blog/getting-started-with-payloads/ I have
implemented my own PayloadSimilarity class. When debugging the code I have
noticed
Hello,
I'm running Solr 5.1 and during indexing I get an
ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException at line 61 of
org/apache/solr/util/RecordingJSONParser.java. Looking at the code (see
below), it seems obvious that the if-statement at line 60 should use a
greater-than sign instead of greater-than-or-equals.
On 4/24/2015 4:54 AM, Kumaradas Puthussery Krishnadas wrote:
> I am creating a SolrCloud with 4 solr instances and 5 zookeeper instances. I
> need to make sure that querying is working even when my 3 zookeepers are
> down. But it looks like the queries using json transformation based xslt
> tem
Stupid me (yet again):
Should have taken a TEXT instead of (only) a STRING field for the content ;)
Another question I have though (which fits the subject even better):
In the log I see many
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: missing content stream
at
org.apache.solr.handler.ContentSt
Try breaking down the query to see which part of it is slow. If it turns
out to be the range query you may want to look into using an frange
postfilter.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 6:50 AM, Norgorn wrote:
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> Yes, 100% CPU is use
Context: Solr/Lucene 5.1
Adding documents to Solr core/index through SolrJ
I extract pdf's using tika. The pdf-content is one of the fields of my
SolrDocuments that are transmitted to Solr using SolrJ.
As not all documents seem to be "coming through" I looked into the Solr-logs
and see the follw
Hi,
Using the approach here
http://lucidworks.com/blog/getting-started-with-payloads/ I have
implemented my own PayloadSimilarity class. When debugging the code I have
noticed, that the scorePayload method is never called. What could be wrong?
[code]
class PayloadSimilarity extends DefaultSimi
I am creating a SolrCloud with 4 solr instances and 5 zookeeper instances. I
need to make sure that querying is working even when my 3 zookeepers are down.
But it looks like the queries using json transformation based xslt templates
which is not available since the zookeeper ensemble is not ava
Thanks for your reply.
Yes, 100% CPU is used by SOLR (100% - I mean 1 core, not all cores), I'm
totally sure.
I have more than 80 GB RAM on test machine and about 50 is cached as disk
cache, SOLR uses about 8, Xmx=40G.
I use GC1, but it can't be the problem, cause memory usage is much lower
than
Java side:
- launch jvisualvm
- see how heap and CPU are occupied
What are your JVM settings (heap) and how much RAM do you have?
The CPU100% is used only by Solr? That is, are you 100% certain it's Solr
that drives CPU to it's limit?
pozdrawiam,
LAFK
2015-04-24 12:14 GMT+02:00 Norgorn :
> The
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So has anyone knows what is the issue with the "Heap Memory Usage" reading
> showing the value -1. Should I open an issue in Jira?
I have solr 4.8.1 and solr 5.0.0 servers, on the solr 4.8.1 servers
the core statistics have val
The number of documents in collection is about 100m.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Simple-search-low-speed-tp4202135p4202152.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hello list,
I'm wondering if there could extra parameters or query operators that
where I could impose that sorting by relevance should be relaxed so that
there's a minimum diversity in some fields in the first page of results.
For example, I'd like the search results to contain at least three
po
Hey Erick,
thanks a lot for your answer. I went to the admin schema browser, but what
should I see there? Sorry I'm not firm with the admin schema browser. :-(
Best
Steve
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 23. April 201
We have simple search over 50 GB index.
And it's slow.
I can't even wonder why, whole index is in RAM (and a lot of free space is
available) and CPU is a bottleneck (100% load).
The query is simple (except tvrh):
q=(text:(word1+word2)++title:(word1+word2))&tv=true&isShard=true&qt=/tvrh&fq=cat:(10
If u need only 200 results grouped, u can easily do it with some external
code, it will be much faster anyway.
Also, it's widely suggested to use docValues="true" for fields, by which
group is performed, it really helps (I can only say numbers in terms of RAM
usage, but speed increases as-well).
Hi,
So has anyone knows what is the issue with the "Heap Memory Usage" reading
showing the value -1. Should I open an issue in Jira?
Regards,
Edwin
On 22 April 2015 at 21:23, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo wrote:
> I see. I'm running on SolrCloud with 2 replicia, so I guess mine will
> probably use much
35 matches
Mail list logo
