Thanks Chris and Alex for clarification :)
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : So are we still using the jetty? Are we still dependent on war file?
>
> As explained in the ref guide...
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Maj
HI,
Our production solr’s replication was offline in some time but both zookeeper
and network is ok, and Solr jvm is normal.
my question are there any other reason will let solr’s replication into
recovering state?
> Followup:
>
> I was able to get Solr 5.0.0 started under the jetty9 distribution you
> mentioned. I unpacked the jetty archive, changed into the unpacked
> directory, and did these extremely simple and fast steps:
>
> * Copied solr.war from solr-5.0.0/server/webapps (in the Solr download)
> in
Passing query params down into analysis chain has been discussed before but I
think it is a bit controversial/complex.
How about a more high-level approach to be able to change query analyzer, e.g.
[f..]q.analyzer=
Then query parsers would use the specified analyzer for a field instead of the
sc
On 2/27/2015 4:29 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 2/27/2015 10:59 AM, h15...@mailas.com wrote:
>> I'm trying a 1st deploy of Solr 5.0.0 in Jetty9
>> (jetty-distribution-9.2.9.v20150224).
>
>
>> I've obviously misconfigured something.
>>
>> Appreciate any help figuring out what!
Followup:
I was abl
Thanks to all for the info. I'd made the mistake of staring with 3rd party
tutorials which seem to miss some of the salient details!.
RTFM'ing the official stuff now ...
> I would strongly recommend that you simply run Solr 5 with the jetty
> server (and the bin/solr script) that's included in
On 2/27/2015 10:59 AM, h15...@mailas.com wrote:
> I'm trying a 1st deploy of Solr 5.0.0 in Jetty9
> (jetty-distribution-9.2.9.v20150224).
> I've obviously misconfigured something.
>
> Appreciate any help figuring out what!
Add-on info to the replies you have already received:
This may be hard
: In 5.0 "the new way" is to not use a servlet container, just use the
: start/stop scripts.
More specifically...
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Major+Changes+from+Solr+4+to+Solr+5
Internally, Solr is still implemented via Servlet APIs and is powered by
Jetty -- but this is s
In 5.0 "the new way" is to not use a servlet container, just use the
start/stop scripts.
you should find a ...solr/bin/solr that you use to start/stop/whatever.
You can still run with a "normal" servlet container, but is there a
particular reason
you need to? If not, just use the start/stop comme
You could simply hash the value before sending it to Solr and then hash the
user query before sending it to Solr as well. Do you need or want only
exact matches, or do you need keyword search, wildcards, etc?
-- Jack Krupansky
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
wrote:
> Don'
On 27 February 2015 at 16:11, Vishal Swaroop wrote:
> I am able to index XML with same "name" element but in different XPATH by
> using XPathEntityProcessor "forEach" (e.g. below)
>
> Just wondering if there is better way to handle this xml format.
DIH's XML parser is rather limited and literally
Don't store it? stored=false, indexed=true
You may need bit more details really. There is no encryption, if you
encrypt it, you cannot search it. So, you should concentrate on
security of access instead and/or full-disk encryption (at the cost to
performance)
Regards,
Alex.
Solr Analy
HI, Do Any one know how to encrypt the Solr Data Stored ? e.g. I have to do a
search on the address for the customer, but the data should be not able to read
by naked eyes?
Thanks
Ravi
Hello Robert. Unstemmed terms have slightly higher IDF so they gain more
weight, but stemmed tokens usually have slightly higher TF, so differences are
marginal at best, especially when using standard TFIDFSimilarity. However, by
setting a payload for stemmed terms, you can recognize them at sea
Hi,
I am able to index XML with same "name" element but in different XPATH by
using XPathEntityProcessor "forEach" (e.g. below)
Just wondering if there is better way to handle this xml format.
a) Is there any better way to handle this scenario as xml file will have
multiple sub-menu attributes (
Several months ago Tom-Burton West asked:
The Solr wiki says "A repeated question is "how can I have the
original term contribute
more to the score than the stemmed version"? In Solr 4.3, the
KeywordRepeatFilterFactory has been added to assist this
functionality. "
https://wi
On 2/27/2015 12:51 PM, Tang, Rebecca wrote:
> Thank you guys for all the suggestions and help! I'Ve identified the main
> culprit with debug=timing. It was the mlt component. After I removed it,
> the speed of the query went back to reasonable. Another culprit is the
> expand component, but I ca
Thank you guys for all the suggestions and help! I'Ve identified the main
culprit with debug=timing. It was the mlt component. After I removed it,
the speed of the query went back to reasonable. Another culprit is the
expand component, but I can't remove it. We've downgraded our amazon
instance
I'd forgotten that DzkHost refers to the Zookeeper hosts not SOLR hosts.
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Does-shard-splitting-double-host-count-tp4189595p4189703.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
You can't just add a new core to an existing collection. You can add the new
node to the cloud, but it won't be part of any collection. You're not going to
be able to just slide it in as a 4th shard to an established collection of 3
shards.
The root of that comes from routing (I'll assume you
On 2/27/2015 11:42 AM, tuxedomoon wrote:
> What about adding one new leader/replica pair? It seems that would entail
>
> a) creating the r3.large instances and volumes
> b) adding 2 new Zookeeper hosts?
> c) updating my Zookeeper configs (new hosts, new ids, new SOLR config)
> d) restarting all ZK
What about adding one new leader/replica pair? It seems that would entail
a) creating the r3.large instances and volumes
b) adding 2 new Zookeeper hosts?
c) updating my Zookeeper configs (new hosts, new ids, new SOLR config)
d) restarting all ZKs
e) restarting SOLR hosts in sequence needed for co
I'm trying a 1st deploy of Solr 5.0.0 in Jetty9
(jetty-distribution-9.2.9.v20150224).
I've installed Jetty9
/etc/init.d/jetty check
Checking arguments to Jetty:
START_INI = /usr/local/etc/jetty/base/start.ini
START_D= /usr/local/etc/jetty/base/start.d
: So are we still using the jetty? Are we still dependent on war file?
As explained in the ref guide...
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Major+Changes+from+Solr+4+to+Solr+5#MajorChangesfromSolr4toSolr5-SolrisNowaStandaloneServer
"Internally, Solr is still implemented via Servlet
: There were no changes made in the solrconfig.xml file except added that
:
: block.
ok, first off: if you already *had* another updateRequestProcessorChain
that said 'default="true"' just adding a new one would be weird and would
likely give you errors. you have t oconsider the whole context
Hi - we attempt to use payloads to identify different parts of extracted HTML
pages and use the DelimitedPayloadTokenFilter to assign the correct payload to
the tokens. However, we are having issues for some language analyzers and
issues with some types of content for most regular analyzers.
If
Hi Dmitry,
In my environment, I cannot produce this pivots's error in HotSpot VM
1.7.0, please give me some time...
Or, I'll try to make pull requests https://github.com/DmitryKey/luke for
pivots's version.
At any rate, it would be best to manage both of (current) thinlet's and
pivots's versions
On 2/27/2015 7:15 AM, tuxedomoon wrote:
> I currently have a SolrCloud with 3 shards + replicas, it is holding 130M
> documents and the r3.large hosts are running out of memory. As it's on 4.2
> there is no shard splitting, I will have to reindex to a 4.3+ version.
>
> If I had that feature would
Well, if you're going to reindex on a newer version, just start out with the
number of shards you feel is appropriate, and reindex.
But yes, if you had 3 shards, wanted to split some of them, you'd really
have to split all of them (making 6), if you wanted the shards to be about
the same size.
As
I currently have a SolrCloud with 3 shards + replicas, it is holding 130M
documents and the r3.large hosts are running out of memory. As it's on 4.2
there is no shard splitting, I will have to reindex to a 4.3+ version.
If I had that feature would I need to split each shard into 2 subshards
result
Yep,
Your default URP chain is probably not being triggered due to the
initParams. initParams are new in Solr 5, so this is still rough
around the edges advice.
But try giving your chain a name and adding explicit "update.chain"
value to the requestHandler section (not initParams) section.
Alter
On 2/27/2015 12:51 AM, Danesh Kuruppu wrote:
> I am doing some feasibility studies for moving directly to solr 5.0.0.
>
> One more thing, It is related to standalone server.
>
> How security handle in solr standalone server. lets say, I configured my
> application to use remote solr standalone se
Hi
Thanks for the reply.
I am just beginning with the solr, so not much familiar with the settings
of the solr. I have created solr "collection1" core with the following
command.
bin/solr create -c collection1
Then modified the managed-schema file to add required field definitions
There were n
Hi,
Thanks for the reply.
I tried adding following code block in in solrconfig.xml.
timestamp_dt
and added field definition in managed-schema
But then dont see this field is getting populated in document.
Thanks,
Makailol
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
wrote:
Hi Benson, Shalin,
One more thing that I noticed in your configuration is incorrect definition
of default Solr parameters. You should use tag, not
Oleg
2015-02-27 6:23 GMT+03:00 Shalin Shekhar Mangar :
> Hi Benson,
>
> Do not use shards.qt with a leading '/'. See
> https://issues.apache.org/j
Yes, but these are now implementation details and may change in 5.x
version (as opposed to waiting for 6.0).
So, if you are troubleshooting, it is Jetty underneath with a war
file. But from the architectural point of view, it is now a black box.
So, Tomcat deployments are officially no longer supp
Alex,
I've created JIRA ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7174
In response to your suggestions below:
1. No exceptions are reported, even with onError removed.
2. ProcessMonitor shows only the very first epub file is being read
(repeatedly)
3. I can repeat this on Ubuntu (14.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4014820/solr-highlighting-of-multiple-terms
tells us how to have multiple snippets be returned containing highlighted
searched terms..
my question is: What is the separator of the string that is returned? I'm
seeing it as a carriage return which isn't very helpfu
I have seen this log earlier, I just changed the log level of this class
to WARN.
On Feb 27, 2015 12:03 AM, "Moshe Recanati" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've wired situation. Starting yesterday restart I've issue with log
> encoding. My log looks like:
>
> DEBUG - 2015-02-27 10:47:01.432; <<
> "[0x4][0xfc
Did you check Kibana/Banana ?
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 2:07 PM, bengates wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Here's my need : I'd like to log Solr Responses so as to achieve some
> business statistics.
> I'd like to report, as a daily/weekly/yearly/whateverly basis, the
> following
> KPIs :
> - Most pop
Hello everyone,
Here's my need : I'd like to log Solr Responses so as to achieve some
business statistics.
I'd like to report, as a daily/weekly/yearly/whateverly basis, the following
KPIs :
- Most popular requests (hits)
- Average numfound for each request
- Average response time for each request
Hi,
I am trying to understand the new verson of solr 5 and when I was trying to
stop the solr instance with the command "*bin/solr stop -p 8983*", I found
this message,
*Sending stop command to Solr running on port 8983 ... waiting 5 seconds to
allow Jetty process 7028 to stop gracefully.*
So ar
42 matches
Mail list logo
