Hi,
I saw message rejected because of attachment.
I uploaded data to drive
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0GR0M-lL5QHVDNjZlUwVTR2QTQ/view?usp=sharing
Moshe
From: Moshe Recanati [mailto:mos...@kmslh.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2015 8:37 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: NRTCac
Please proceed
Regards,
Moshe Recanati
SVP Engineering
Office + 972-73-2617564
Mobile + 972-52-6194481
Skype : recanati
More at: www.kmslh.com | LinkedIn | FB
-Original Message-
From: postmas...@ssww.com [mailto:postmas...@ssww.com] On Behalf Of
h...@ssww.com
Sent: Sunday, Febru
The following message addressed to you was quarantined because it likely
contains a virus:
Subject: RE: NRTCachingDirectory threads stuck
From: Moshe Recanati
However, if you know the sender and are expecting an attachment, please reply
to this message, and we will forward the quarantined mess
On 2/21/2015 6:33 PM, Walter Underwood wrote:
> Never do POST for a read-only request. Never. That only guarantees that you
> cannot reproduce the problem by looking at the logs.
>
> If your design requires extremely long GET requests, you may need to re-think
> your design.
I agree with those
SEO is search fun
subject!http://www.academia.edu/1033371/Hyponymy_extraction_and_web_search_behavior_analysis_based_on_query_reformulation
planeta terra (planet earth),planeta (planet).Conclusion : Planet earth is a
hyponym of planetplaneta terra (planet earth),planeta (planet).Conclusion :
Pla
Am an expert? Not sure, but I worked on an enterprise search spider and search
engine for about a decade (Ultraseek Server) and I’ve done customer-facing
search for another 6+ years.
Let the server reject URLs it cannot handle. Great servers will return a 414,
good servers will return a 400, br
Thank you! I tried (pg_int:"-1") and (pg_int:\-1) and they both worked (I got
118 results back as expected).
The field pg_int is defined as follows:
Rebecca
From: Jack Krupansky [jack.krupan...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2015 3:04 PM
To
On 2/21/2015 1:46 AM, steve wrote:
> Careful with the GETs! There is a real, hard limit on the length of a GET url
> (in the low hundreds of characters). That's why a POST is so much better for
> complex queries; the limit is in the hundreds of MegaBytes.
The limit on a GET command (including th
I would classify this behavior as a bug, even if we can explain it somehow
- it is certainly not intuitively expected.
As a workaround, try placing the -1 in quotes: (pg_int:"-1"). Or escape the
minus with a backslash: (pg_int:\-1)
Also, what is the field and field type for pg_int?
The edismax q
Hi there,
I have a field pg_int which is number of pages stored as integer. There are
118 records in my index with pg_int = -1.
If I search the index with pg_int:-1, I get the correct records returned in the
results.
{ "responseHeader": { "status": 0, "QTime": 1, "params": { "debugQuery":
"tr
Thank you! Another 4xx error that makes sense. Quoting from the Book of
StackOverFlowhttp://stackoverflow.com/questions/2659952/maximum-length-of-http-get-request"Most
webservers have a limit of 8192 bytes (8KB), which is usually configureable
somewhere in the server configuration. As to the cli
The HTTP protocol does not set a limit on GET URL size, but individual web
servers usually do. You should get a response code of “414 Request-URI Too
Long” when the URL is too long.
This limit is usually configurable.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/
Tom:
I updated the CWiki a bit base don this conversation, does that do it?
trying to balance between tl;dr and not enough info...
Erick
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Tom Burton-West wrote:
> Thanks Hoss,
>
> Protection from misconfiguration and/or starting separate solr instances
> pointing
What you are describing is hyponymy. Pastry is the hypernym. You can
accomplish this by not using expansion, for example:
cannelloni => cannelloni, pastry
This has the result of adding pastry to the index.
Ryan
On Saturday, February 21, 2015, Mikhail Khludnev
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> usually debu
Hello,
usually debugQuery=true output explains a lot of such details.
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 10:52 AM, davym wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm querying a recipe database in Solr. By using synonyms, I'm trying to
> make my search a little smarter.
>
> What I'm trying to do here, is that a search for pas
And I'm familiar with the setup and configuration using Python, JavaScript, and
PHP; not at all with Java.
> Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 01:52:07 -0700
> From: osta...@gmail.com
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Performing DIH on predefined list of IDS
>
> That's right, but I am not su
That's right, but I am not sure that if it is works with Get I will able to
use Post without changing it.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Performing-DIH-on-predefined-list-of-IDS-tp4187589p4187838.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble
Careful with the GETs! There is a real, hard limit on the length of a GET url
(in the low hundreds of characters). That's why a POST is so much better for
complex queries; the limit is in the hundreds of MegaBytes.
> Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 01:42:03 -0700
> From: osta...@gmail.com
> To: solr-user
Yes, you right, I am not using a DB.
SolrEntityProcessor is using a GET method, so I will need to send
relatively big URL ( something like a hundreds of ids ) hope it will be
possible.
Any way I think it is the only method to perform reindex if I want to
control it and be able to continue fr
19 matches
Mail list logo
