Toke, won't be able to use TermsComponent as i had complex filter criteria
on other fields.
Michael, i understood your idea of paging without using start=,
will prototype it as it is possible in my usecase also and post here
results i got with this approach.
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 10:05 PM, Mich
You can also implement your own cursor easily enough if you have a
unique sortkey (not relevance score). Say you can sort by id, then you
select batch 1 (50k docs, say) and record the last (maximum) id in the
batch. For the next batch, limit it to id > last_id and get the first
50k docs (don't
Naresh Yadav [nyadav@gmail.com] wrote:
> Thanks for sharing solr internal's for my problem. I will definitely try
> Cursor also but only problem is my current
> solr version is 4.6.1 in which i guess cursor support is not there.
I thinkt it was added in 4.7, so you are right that it will proba
Hi Toke,
Thanks for sharing solr internal's for my problem. I will definitely try
Cursor also but only problem is my current
solr version is 4.6.1 in which i guess cursor support is not there. Any
other option i have for this problem ??
Also as per your suggestion i will try to avoid regional uni
Naresh Yadav [nyadav@gmail.com] wrote:
> In both setups, we are reading in batches of 50k and each batch taking
> Setup1 : approx 7 seconds and for completing all batches of total 10 lakh
> results takes 1 to 2 minutes.
> Setup2 : approx 2-3 minutes and for completing all batches of total 10 l
