On 11/20/2014 10:51 PM, solr2020 wrote:
> we have a Solr(solr4.2) setup with Jetty web server and the events are
> logged using log4j with the log level INFO.But here we would like to get
> more details about the update request received by UpdateRequestHandler. So
> is there anyway to configure deb
Hi ,
we have a Solr(solr4.2) setup with Jetty web server and the events are
logged using log4j with the log level INFO.But here we would like to get
more details about the update request received by UpdateRequestHandler. So
is there anyway to configure debug log level kind of stuff for Update
requ
This is totally weird. What version of Solr? Because the strangest thing
is that the facet.query clause is getting lost on the way _in_. When I tried
this query (5x, I'll admit), at least the echo params at the top had both
facet queries, even when the lastsaveddate was undefined!
In fact if I put
Thank you so much, Mikhail! It works perfectly.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Mikhail Khludnev <
mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Nicholas Ding
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Mikhail,
> >
> > Thank you very much! I'm using eDisMax by default, I think I will need to
>
Hi Joseph,
Thank you for asking. If you want to do it in the interactive sense,
it won't work well practically because it takes several minutes for learning.
If you accept working in batch sense, the feature can be implemented,
but I've not done it yet. I have the open ticket for that:
accept f
Hi,
I'm having problems with queries that have multiple facet.query fields.
Per the docs:
[http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#Facet_Fields_and_Facet_Queries]
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=video&rows=0&facet=true&facet.field=inStock&facet.query=price:[*+TO+500]&facet.query=pr
Thanks Glen for the URL. I'd like to check it when I am available.
Thanks Paul for giving me the difference between them. I like your description!
Koji
(2014/11/21 2:18), Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> As far as I could tell, word2vec seems more mathematical, which is rather
> nice.
> At least I see m
Hi Koji - is it possible to execute word2vec on a subset of documents from
Solr? - ie could I run a query, get back the top n results and pass only
those to word2vec?
Will this work with Solr Cloud?
Thank you!
-Joe
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> As far as I could t
Hello,
We have 20mil document solr index which contains multiValued fields of
numbers.
We have omitNorms="true" omitTermFreqAndPositions="true" , but looks like
solr still calculating idf and tf for the field. Is there any other way
except creating custom similarity to fix this issue? I just want
Hi,
I am currently working on a people search tool using SOLR to facilitate
the indexing + fuzzy search across multiple fields (with edismax), using
various filters such as SynonymFilterFactory, WordDelimiterFactory etc and
disabling TF-IDF.
This works very well, except for a few cases where a s
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Nicholas Ding
wrote:
> Hi Mikhail,
>
> Thank you very much! I'm using eDisMax by default, I think I will need to
> change it to defType=func and
I wonder why do you ask, because the given link has three examples of
including edismax into the simple calculation.
As far as I could tell, word2vec seems more mathematical, which is rather nice.
At least I see more transparent math in the web-page.
Maybe this helps a bit?
SemanticVectors has always rather pleasant for the LSI/LSA-like approach, but
precisely this is mathematically opaque.
Maybe it's more a q
Oversharding is another option that punts the ball further down the
road, but 5 years from now somebody _else_ will have to deal with it
;)...
You can host multiple shards on a single Solr. So say you think you'll
need 20 shards in 5 years (or whatever). Start with 20 shards on your
single machine
Doss:
Tomcat often puts things in "catalina.out", you might check there,
I've often seen logging information from Solr go there by
default.
Without having some idea what kinds of problems Solr is
reporting when you see this situation, it's really hard to say.
Some things I'd check first though,
Hi All,
I want to use Boost feature by using elevate.xml file. It works perfectly on
local system because on local there is no cloud server or zookeeper. Here
when i update elevate.xml file and refresh the solr admin page it instantly
reflect the changes in this file and after taking reload of par
Hi All,
I want to use Boost feature by using elevate.xml file. It works perfectly on
local system because on local there is no cloud server or zookeeper. Here
when i update elevate.xml file and refresh the solr admin page it instantly
reflect the changes in this file and after taking reload of par
The collections we index under this multi-collection alias does not use
real time get, no. We have other collections behind single-collection
aliases where get calls seem to work, but I'm not clear whether the
calls are real time. Seems like it would be easy for you to test, but
just be aware t
Hi Koji,
Semantic vectors is here: http://code.google.com/p/semanticvectors/
It is a project that has been around for a number of years and used by many
people (including me
http://zzzoot.blogspot.com/2009/07/project-torngat-building-large-scale.html
).
If you could compare and contrast word2vec
Just confirmed that you do need to create the core directory before doing
the SHARDSPLIT (at least with HDFS) - otherwise it fails saying that it
cannot find classes - like the cluster classes.
Iv'e noticed that the disk usage on HDFS goes up when I do the split - for
example, if I split a 100G sh
Hi Paul,
I cannot compare it to SemanticVectors as I don't know SemanticVectors.
But word vectors that are produced by word2vec have interesting properties.
Here is the description of the original word2vec web site:
https://code.google.com/p/word2vec/#Interesting_properties_of_the_word_vectors
I
Hi Nicholas,
you can use "sort by function" feature of solr.
&sort=sum(
mul(query(field:TfIdfQuery),x1),
mul(x1,v2))
On Thursday, November 20, 2014 4:23 PM, Nicholas Ding
wrote:
Hi Mikhail,
Thank you very much! I'm using eDisMax by default, I think I will need to
change it to defType=func a
Hi Mikhail,
Thank you very much! I'm using eDisMax by default, I think I will need to
change it to defType=func and pass all the query parameters (fq mainly) to
the sub query right?
Nicholas Ding
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Mikhail Khludnev <
mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> wrote:
> Hello Nic
Hi all,
I am using solr version 4.7.2 for indexing. I have some questions to be
cleared.
1. Is solr server supports other transports methods like thrift etc
2. when we are using HttpSolrServer, how we secure the data publishing.
use case is we need to restrict data publishing for specfic
If you're willing to write some Java you can do something more efficient
by intersecting two terms enumerations: this works with constant memory
for any number of values in two fields, basically like intersecting any
two sorted lists, you leap frog between them. I have an example if
you're int
Dear Erick,
Forgive my ignorance.
Please find some of the details you required.
*have you looked at the solr logs?*
> Sorry I haven't defined the log4j.properties file, so I don't have solr
logs. Since it requires tomcat restart I am planning to do it in next
restart.
But found the following
Hello Koji,
how would you compare that to SemanticVectors?
paul
On 20 nov. 2014, at 10:10, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It's my pleasure to share that I have an interesting tool "word2vec for
> Lucene"
> available at https://github.com/kojisekig/word2vec-lucene .
>
> As you can imagin
Hello Nicholas!
you can specify a function query as a main query where you can operate with
DVs, then you can use regular tfidf score from arbitrary query as one of
the arguments in the functional query see an example in
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery#query
have a good research!
On Thu
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Priya Rodrigues wrote:
> public void setContext( TransformContext context ) {
> try {
> IndexReader reader = qparser.getReq().getSearcher().getIndexReader();
> ->Refcount incremented
You can get a searcher from the request as many times as you like...
it
Hello,
It's my pleasure to share that I have an interesting tool "word2vec for Lucene"
available at https://github.com/kojisekig/word2vec-lucene .
As you can imagine, you can use "word2vec for Lucene" to extract word vectors
from Lucene index.
Thank you,
Koji
--
http://soleami.com/blog/compar
Hi David,
you might want to look at SIREn 1.4 [1], a plugin for Lucene/Solr, that
includes a update handler [2] which mimics elasticsearch index api. You
can push JSON documents to the API and it will dynamically flatten and
index the JSON documents into a set of fields (similar to
Elasticsea
On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 23:53 +0100, Peter Sturge wrote:
> Yes, the 'lots-of-booleans' thing is a bit prohibitive as it won't
> realistically scale to large value sets.
"large" is extremely relative in Solr Land, but I would be weary of
going beyond 10K.
> 127.0.0.1:8983/solr/net/select?q=*:*&fl=de
31 matches
Mail list logo
