Hi all,
Currently we are using solr for service meta data indexing and Searching .
we have embedded solr server running in our application and we are using
solr 1.4 version. Have some doubts to be clear.
1. What are the performance improvements we can gain from updating to the
latest solr version
bq: But with my new query, could I just remove the defType=lucene parameter and
the wildcard right
Well, It Depends (tm). You can specify the query parser as part of
the requestHandler and, indeed, leave it off the query.
As far as the wildcard goes, it also depends. You'll change the semantics
o
Sorry, one final thing.
In my current application I search like this:
"&q=title:*&defType=lucene
I was checking here: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrQuerySyntax
But with my new query, could I just remove the defType=lucene parameter and
the wildcard right? Or am I overlooking something then?
You were right, I had an old configuration :)
But using your new suggestions had made that it works! Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Flexible-search-field-analyser-tokenizer-configuration-tp4161624p4162249.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list a
That makes perfect sense , thanks again!
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 10/1/2014 7:08 PM, S.L wrote:
> > Thanks ,load balancer seems to be the preferred solution here , I have a
> > topology where I have 6 Solr nodes that support 3 shards with a
> replication
> > fact
On 10/1/2014 7:08 PM, S.L wrote:
> Thanks ,load balancer seems to be the preferred solution here , I have a
> topology where I have 6 Solr nodes that support 3 shards with a replication
> factor of 2.
>
> Looks like it woul dbe better to use the load balancers for querying
> only.The question, tha
1>
Hmmm, you _should_ have some line like:
in solrconfig.xml, otherwise the url you posted has no
destination.
http://localhost:8983/solr/bm/select
implies that there's a request handler to, well, handle it so I'm
puzzled.
When you _do_ find the request handler, there should be a line like
this:
Shawn,
Thanks ,load balancer seems to be the preferred solution here , I have a
topology where I have 6 Solr nodes that support 3 shards with a replication
factor of 2.
Looks like it woul dbe better to use the load balancers for querying
only.The question, that I have is if I go the load balancer
On 10/1/2014 2:29 PM, S.L wrote:
> Right , but my query was to know if there are any Python clients which
> achieve the same thing as SolrJ , or the approach one should take when
> using Python based clients.
If the python client can support multiple hosts and failing over between
them, then you
: My current setup does not use the ImageUrl field for the search (more
: specifically as the default search field). The ImageUrl field contains a URL
: to the image which is for most part a GUID, which is meaningless to users.
: However, I would like to note that the ImageUrl field is Indexed and
: I am indexing Solr 4.9.0 using the /update request handler and am getting
: errors from Tika - Illegal IOException from
: org.apache.tika.parser.xml.DcXMLParser@74ce3bea which is caused by
: MalFormedByteSequenceException: Invalid byte 1 of 1-byte UTF-8 sequence. I
FWIW: that error appears to h
Hi,
raw query parser or term query parser would be handy.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Other+Parsers#OtherParsers-TermQueryParser
Ahmet
On Thursday, October 2, 2014 12:32 AM, tedsolr wrote:
I am trying to do SQL like aggregation (GROUP BY) with solr faceting. So I
use st
When you call addFacetField, the parameter you pass it should just be the
fieldName. The fieldValue shouldn't come into play at all (unless I'm
misunderstanding what you're trying to do).
If you ever do need to escape a value for a query, you can use
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.util.ClientUtil
I am trying to do SQL like aggregation (GROUP BY) with solr faceting. So I
use string fields for faceting - to try to get an exact match. However, it
seems like to run a facet query I have to surround the value with double
quotes. That poses issues when the field value is
green "bath" towels
-or-
I know of 10 Python Solr clients. you can find the list at:
https://leanpub.com/solr-clients/read#leanpub-auto-clients
I don't think any of them are as complete as SolrJ, but I would look
at SolrCloudPy (it has a nice console too).
Regards,
Alex.
Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @ar
Hi Erick,
Thanks for clarifying some of this :)
That triggers a few more questions:
1. I have no df" setting in my solrconfig.xml file at all, nor do I see a
Right , but my query was to know if there are any Python clients which
achieve the same thing as SolrJ , or the approach one should take when
using Python based clients.
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014, at 08:47 PM, S.L wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > We re
Hi,
I have some records which include a source_id field which is an integer and
a datetime field. I want the records to be ordered such that the adjacent
records should not have the same source ids. It should perform some sort of
round robin on the records with the source_id as kay and they should
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014, at 08:47 PM, S.L wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We recently moved from a single Solr instance to SolrCloud and we are
> using
> pysolr , I am wondering what options (clients) we have from Python to
> take advantage of Zookeeper and load balancing capabilities that
> SolrCloud
> prov
Hi All,
We recently moved from a single Solr instance to SolrCloud and we are using
pysolr , I am wondering what options (clients) we have from Python to
take advantage of Zookeeper and load balancing capabilities that SolrCloud
provides if I were to use a smart client like Solrj?
Thanks.
Thanks Erick, No problem. Will check .
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> I'm clueless about the MongoDB connector. I suspect
> that's where the issue is unless you can reproduce
> this with a solr-only case.
>
> As you can tell, I don't recall seeing this problem come by
>
Hoss,
Nice to hear you! I wonder if there is a sequence chart, or maybe a deck,
which explains the whole picture of distributed search, especially these
ones?
If it hasn't been presented to community so far, I'm aware of one
conference which can accept such talk. WDYT?
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 9:17
I'm clueless about the MongoDB connector. I suspect
that's where the issue is unless you can reproduce
this with a solr-only case.
As you can tell, I don't recall seeing this problem come by
the boards.
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Sujatha Arun wrote:
> Erick,
>
> Actually I am
There's some confusion here.
First of all, you shouldn't be getting docs like "The Wall" at all,
_assuming_ your fq clause is meant to only include docs with
"the Royal Garden" in the results list. What's happening here is
that the text is being searched for in the default search field, which
will
Hello!
I am indexing Solr 4.9.0 using the /update request handler and am getting
errors from Tika - Illegal IOException from
org.apache.tika.parser.xml.DcXMLParser@74ce3bea which is caused by
MalFormedByteSequenceException: Invalid byte 1 of 1-byte UTF-8 sequence. I
believe that this is the result
Two things:
1> what version of Solr are you using? If it's prior to 3.6, then the
bits that handle applying lowercaseFilter to wildcards isn't in the
code.
2> what do you see if you add &debug=query?
I just tried it with your analysis chain and it seemed to work. Did
you completely blow your ind
http://project.carrot2.org/ is worth having a look at. It supports
Solr well. In fact, a subset of it is shipped with Solr
Regards,
Alex.
Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov
Solr resources and newsletter: http://www.solr-start.com/ and @solrstart
Solr popularizers community: h
I have a SolrCloud setup with two shards.
When I use "query.set("fq","{!collapse field=title_s}");" the results
show duplicates because of the sharding.
EX:
{status=0,QTime=1141,params={fl=id,code_s,issuedate_tdt,pageno_i,subhead_s,title_s,type_s,citation_articleTitle_s,citation_articlePageNo
If you use "*" you use Multiterm analysis path, which is semi-hidden
and is a lot more limited to the things done with normal tokens:
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultitermQueryAnalysis
The Analyzer components that are NOT multiterm aware cannot be used
that way. Looking at: http://www.solr-start.
Did you solve this problem?
I am experiencing (Solr 4.4.0 not clustered) the same behavior when the
files are mounted via sshfs (a requirement) but not when they are mounted
via nfs.
I'm hoping you solved your problem and might have advice on how I can solve
mine.
Thanks,
Grainne
--
View th
Erick,
Actually I am synching data between solr and Mongodb using
mongo-connector.The details below. I have submitterd an issue in
Mongo-conenctor forum,just trying at the solr forum too just in case
anybody has encountered the same :) or why does the log state No
uncommitted changes. Skipping
Ok, I missed the Query tab where I can do the actual site search :)
I've also used your links, but even with those I fail to grasp why the
following is happening:
This is my query:
http://localhost:8983/solr/bm/select?q=*%3A*&fq=The+Royal+Garden&rows=50&fl=id%2Ctitle&wt=xml&indent=true
And belo
Thanks a lot Jack, it makes total sense. I check the config and default q.op
was set to OR, which was influencing the query.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Boost-Query-bq-syntax-usage-tp4161989p4162169.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at N
From: Charlie Hull [char...@flax.co.uk]:
> We've just found a very similar issue at a client installation. They have
> around 27 million documents and are faceting on fields with high
> cardinality, and are unhappy with query performance and the server hardware
> necessary to make this performance
: For eg : "red shirt under 20$" should be translated to q=shirt&fq=price:[*
: TO 20] and possibly apply color to one the attribute of doc index.
:
: in parser overrided method, how can i add the filter and pass the query
: back?
I don't think you can acomplish this just within the QParser API .
: +1 for using a different cache, but that's being quite unfamiliar with the
: code.
in (a) common case, people tend to "drill down" and filter on facet
constraints -- so using a special purpose cache for the refinements would
result in redundent caching of the same info in multiple places.
:
I'm still stuck on this actually. I would really appreciate any pointers.
If I search for :
query 1: Κώστας
result: Κώστας
query 2: Κώστα*
result:
I've looked at the analyser but I don't really understand what I'm looking
at if I'm honest. It gives the output:
Field (name): title
Field value: Κ
At this point details matter a lot.
What exactly are you doing when you update?
What happens if you issue an explicit update command? i.e.
http://blahlbah/solr/collection/update?commit=true?
Are you sure you aren't seeing, say, browser caching?
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Sujat
Thanks, BookId is the unique key, the issue is resolved with respect to
delete .Its the update that causing the issue
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> I'd add only one thing to Angel's comments:
> you're deleting by "id", but querying by "BookId". This
> _should_ work (on
Perhaps your ngram filter is set to terminate at 14 (maxGram)?
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 3:18 AM, xoku wrote:
> help me!
> i can't find all result.
> str name="spellcheck.count">200
> Ex:
> i find: file
> result expected: file name documentabcxyz
> but solr return result (suggest: resul
I'd add only one thing to Angel's comments:
you're deleting by "id", but querying by "BookId". This
_should_ work (on a quick glance at the code) iff
your is "BookId"...
I took a quick glance at the code and "id" should delete by
, so is your "BookId" the in
your schema?
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 a
Alejandro, you'll have to clarify how you are using the term "federated
search". I mean, technically Ahmet is correct in that Solr queries can be
fanned out to shards and the results from each shard aggregated
("federated") into a single result list, but... more traditionally,
"federated" refer
Hi,
Federation is possible. Solr has distributed search support with shards
parameter.
Ahmet
On Wednesday, October 1, 2014 4:29 PM, Alejandro Calbazana
wrote:
Hello,
I have a general question about Solr in a federated search context. I
understand that Solr does not do federated search and
Hello,
I have a general question about Solr in a federated search context. I
understand that Solr does not do federated search and that different tools
are often used to incorporate Solr indexes into a federated/enterprise
search solution. Does anyone have recommendations on any products (open
Ahmet - many thanks - I removed the EnglishPorterFilterFactory and reindexed
and this seems to behave as expected now.
Jack - thanks aswell - I'm very much a noob with this, and thats a great
tip.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Wildcard-search-makes-no-sen
Unless you consider yourself to be a "Solr expert", it would be best to
implement such query translation in an application layer.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: sagarprasad
Sent: Wednesday, October 1, 2014 3:27 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Adding filter in c
The presence of a wildcard in a query term short circuits some portions of
the analysis process. Some token filters like lower case can still be
performed on the query terms, but others, like stemming, cannot. So, either
simplify the analysis (be more selective of what token filters you use), or
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 13:16 +0200, Wayne W wrote:
> query 2: capit*
> result: Capital Health
>
> query 3: capita*
> result:
You are likely using a stemmer for the field: "Capital Health" gets
indexed as "capit" and "health", so there are no tokens starting with
"capita".
Turn off the stemmer or
Hi,
Probably you have stemmer and it is eating up Capital to capit. Thats the
reason.
Either remove stemmer from analyser chain or add keyword repeat filter.
Ahmet
On Wednesday, October 1, 2014 2:16 PM, Wayne W
wrote:
Hi,
I don't understand this at all. We are indexing some contact names.
Hi,
I don't understand this at all. We are indexing some contact names. When we
do a standard query:
query 1: capi*
result: Capital Health
query 2: capit*
result: Capital Health
query 3: capita*
result:
query 4: capital*
result:
I understand (as we are using solar 3.5) that the wildcard sea
help me!
i can't find all result.
str name="spellcheck.count">200
Ex:
i find: file
result expected: file name documentabcxyz
but solr return result (suggest: result term object) :
-
[suggestions:protected] => Array
(
[0] => file
[1] => file (whitespace)
I think you should test with facet.shard.limit=-1 this will disallow the
limit for the facet on the shards and remove the needs for facet
refinements. I bet that returning every facet with a count greater than 0
on internal queries is cheaper than using the filter cache to handle a lot
of refinemen
On 30/09/2014 22:25, Erick Erickson wrote:
Just from a 20,000 ft. view, using the filterCache this way seems...odd.
+1 for using a different cache, but that's being quite unfamiliar with the
code.
Here's a quick update:
1. LFUCache performs worse so we returned to LRUCache
2. Making the cache
Hello Sujatha,
have you tried to leave the quotes out? :-)
Alternatively try using 'id:1.0' to see
if the same error arises.
A bit more information on the Update issue (exact query sent and all the
log corresponding entries) would be needed to help you with your problem.
Cheers
Angel
On 0
I am new bee in SOLR and OpenNLP. I am trying to do a POC and want to write a
custom parser which can parse the query string using NLP and create an
appropriate SOLR query with filters.
For eg : "red shirt under 20$" should be translated to q=shirt&fq=price:[*
TO 20] and possibly apply color to on
I am having the following issue on delete and update in solr 4.7.0
*Delete Issue*
I am using the following Curl command to delete a document from index
curl http://localhost:8080/solr/bf/update?commit=true -H "Content-Type:
text/xml" --data-binary '"1.0"'
07
This is what I see in logs
I
56 matches
Mail list logo
