I have CLOUD with 3 nodes and 16 MB RAM on each.
My index is about 1 TB and search speed is awfully bad.
I've read, that one needs at least 50% of index size in RAM, but I suerly
can't afford it.
Please, tell me, is there any way to improve perfomance with hardly limited
resources?
Yes, I can try t
Hi Jack:
Thanks for the response, yes the way you describe I know it works and is how I
get it to work but then what does mean the snippet of the documentation I see
on the documentation about overriding the default components shipped with Solr?
Even on the book Solr in Action in chapter 7 list
Hi,
Currently I am using SOLR 1.4.1 and want to migrate to SOLR 4.9.
Is there any manual or link for 1.4 to 4.9? Which can guide step by step on
1. solrconfig.xml changes
2. schema.xml changes
3. changes required in version 1.4.1 queries.
Thanks
Vivek
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:19 AM,
You set the defaults on the "search handler", not the "search component".
See solrconfig.xml:
explicit
10
text
...
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Jorge Luis Betancourt Gonzalez
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:02 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Or simply enclosed the full term in quotes:
q=path:"my path"
Which is more properly encoded as:
q=path:%22my+path%22
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:02 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: query for space char
bq: Is accessing the stored data going to have a big impact on the time to
return results?
If I'm reading this right, this an anti-pattern. Consider a corpus with 10M
documents, and your query matches 1M of them. Your collector might be going
out to disk to get the stored field and decompress it 1
You should be able to escape it with a backslash, as
search\ with\ spaces
Best,
Erick
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Samuel Smith wrote:
> Should I be able to search a text field in my index for any value that
> contains white space?
>
> The value in my “path” field contains an untokenized st
I'm creating a custom function (extends ValueSource). I'm generating a value
that will both be returned as a value in the hit for each doc and also be used
to sort. As I read the documentation, this is not difficult.
To determine the value for a document, I need to access the "stored" fields f
Should I be able to search a text field in my index for any value that contains
white space?
The value in my “path” field contains an untokenized string (“that contains
spaces”).
I can do single character searches for other single special characters no
problem (q=path:*!*, or q=path:*-*), b
Hi,
i try to add documents to the index and boost them (hole document) but i
get this error message:
ERROR org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore –
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error parsing JSON field value.
Unexpected OBJECT_START
Any ideas?
[
{
"add": {
"boost": 1,
>
> when created_at_d:[* TO
> 2014-09-08T23:59:59Z] takes 15 seconds. What do I do wrong?
>
Nothing serious, you just send darn expensive range.
Filter evaluation costs a sum of enumerating terms and enumerating docs
under that range.
To speed it up: you can reduce the number of terms by dropping
Have you tried
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/4_9_1/solr-solrj/org/apache/solr/common/SolrInputDocument.html#addChildDocuments%28java.util.Collection%29
Are you sure your SolrJ.jar is not really old?
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Ali Nazemian wrote:
> Dear all,
> Hi,
> I was wondering how can I
To be clear, those exceptions are during the "main" mapred job that is
creating the many small indexes. If these errors above occur (they don't
fail the job), I am 99% sure that is when the MTree job later hangs.
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Brett Hoerner
wrote:
> I believe these are related
I believe these are related (they are new to me), anyone seen anything like
this in Solr mapred?
Error: java.io.IOException:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException:
org.apache.lucene.index.CorruptIndexException: checksum failed (hardwar
Thank you Erick for your prompt response. I'm sorry I could not get back to
you earlier.
My current setup does not use the ImageUrl field for the search (more
specifically as the default search field). The ImageUrl field contains a URL
to the image which is for most part a GUID, which is meaningl
Hello,
queryResultWindowSize sets the number of documents to cache for each
query in the queryResult cache.So if you normally output 10 results per
pages, and users don't go beyond page 3 of results, you could set
queryResultWindowSize to 30 and the second and third page requests will
read f
Thanks for all the responses. I will try copying the corresponding segments
to the corresponding shards
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 8:26 PM, ralph tice wrote:
> If you are updating or deleting from your indexes I don't believe it is
> possible to get a consistent copy of the index from the file syst
Thanks Shawn, will try and it out without re-indexing and see how that goes.
Nitin
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 9/23/2014 8:40 AM, Nitin Agarwal wrote:
> > Hi, we are planning for a Solr Cloud upgrade from 4.7.1 to 4.10. I have
> > identified the following steps for
Hi, folks!
I can't find an example to post document with child boosted documents using
json update handler.
{
"add":{
"boost":2.3,
"doc":{
"id":"123",
"title":{"boost":4,"value":"simple text"},
"_childDocuments_":[
{
"id":"123_0",
"child":"te
you can register for webinar also to know more about Fusion on Oct 2nd.
http://lucidworks.com/blog/say-hello-to-lucidworks-fusion/
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Jack Krupansky
wrote:
> You simply download it yourself and give yourself a demo!!
>
> http://lucidworks.com/product/fusion/
>
>
Hi:
I’m trying to change the default configuration for the query component of a
SearchHandler, basically I want to set a default value to the rows parameters
and that this value be shared by all my SearchHandlers, as stated on the
solrconfig.xml comments, this could be accomplished redeclaring
First Thanks very much for your answers, and Alan's one
>> I have a solr index (12 M docs, 45Go) with facets, and I'm trying to
improve facet queries performances.
>> 1/ I tried to use docvalue on facet fields, it didn't work well
> That was surprising, as the normal result of switching to DocVa
On 9/23/2014 8:40 AM, Nitin Agarwal wrote:
> Hi, we are planning for a Solr Cloud upgrade from 4.7.1 to 4.10. I have
> identified the following steps for the upgrade
>
> 1. Update solrconfig.xml to be compliant with 4.10.
> 2. Update the required jar files and war files from Solr 4.10 distribution.
First off thanks to everybody who worked on SOLR-2894 which allows
distributed pivot faceting. We have been looking forward to that for a
while.
Is anybody else running on >= Solr 4.10 and doing facet pivoting? We just
upgraded to a nightly build of 4.11 and have started to reimplement our
pivot
If you used pivot facets you'd get all the information back, but you'd have
to combine the cells yourself.
Best,
Erick
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 6:02 AM, SolrUser1543 wrote:
> Hi!
> How can I create a facet combining 2 (or more) different fields, without
> using copy field to union them?
> For ex
Thanks Alex,
I will try your "not programming" :) solution. Really appreciate your time and
effort.
manohar
On Sep 22, 2014, at 6:23 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
> You could try - for your ideal scenario - creating an
> UpdateRequestProcessor (URP) chain, that
> includes:ParseDateFieldU
Hi, we are planning for a Solr Cloud upgrade from 4.7.1 to 4.10. I have
identified the following steps for the upgrade
1. Update solrconfig.xml to be compliant with 4.10.
2. Update the required jar files and war files from Solr 4.10 distribution.
3. Verified we are using Java 1.7.
Now comes the q
You simply download it yourself and give yourself a demo!!
http://lucidworks.com/product/fusion/
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Egense
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 2:00 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ANN] Lucidworks Fusion 1.0.0
Hi Grant.
Wil
Why not copy them into a facet field. Space constraints?
If space is the concern, you need to remember that facets use indexed
value, so that copy target field has absolutely no reason to be
stored. And indexed values are stored only once per unique token, so
then you are only paying for posting t
Hi!
How can I create a facet combining 2 (or more) different fields, without
using copy field to union them?
For example if I have this documents:
Doc1 with the field X contains the value a and field Y contains the value b
Doc2 with the field X contains the value c and field Y contains the value a
That's excellent Mikhail !
Thanks so much.
I have to use it in my custom query parser now.
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/AND-operator-in-multi-valued-fields-tp4159715p4160668.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archiv
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/Join
did you check it?
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 4:52 PM, abhayd wrote:
> hi All,
> I am solr schema like
>
> id | task
> 1|t1
> 1|t2
> 2|t2
> 2|t3
>
> I would like to get all the id's where task t2 & t1 are associated with
> same
> id. Is there anyway we can do inner
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:45 PM, lboutros wrote:
> What do you think about developing a new SpanQuery class that allows "cross
> field" queries ?
>
indeed
http://lucene.apache.org/core/3_0_3/api/all/org/apache/lucene/search/spans/FieldMaskingSpanQuery.html
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
33 matches
Mail list logo
