Hi,
My requirements is to execute this query(hive) in solr:
select SUM(Primary_cause_vaR),collect_set(skuType),RiskType,market,
collect_set(primary_cause) from bil_tos Where skuType='Product' group by
RiskType,market;
I can implement sum and groupBy operations in solr using StatsComponent
concep
Thanks Ahmet, I'll give it a shot.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Can-we-do-conditional-boosting-using-edismax-tp4141131p4141268.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I have configured many tomcat+solrCloud setups but I'm trying now to
research the new solr.properties configuration.
I have a functioning zookeeper to which I manually loaded a
configuration using:
zkcli.sh -cmd upconfig \
-zkhost xx.xx.xx.xx:2181 \
-d /test/conf \
-n test
My solr.xm
On 6/11/2014 9:30 AM, Costi Muraru wrote:
> I have a text_general field and want to use its value in a custom function.
> I'm unable to do so. It seems that the tokenizer messes this up and only a
> fraction of the entire value is being retrieved. See below for more details.
Low-level Lucene detai
Hello everyone.
I’m having problems with the performance of queries with facets, the temp
expend to resolve a query is very high.
The index has 10Millions of documents, each one with 100 fields.
The server has 8 cores and 56 Gb of ram, running with jetty with this
memory configuration: -Xms
I have a text_general field and want to use its value in a custom function.
I'm unable to do so. It seems that the tokenizer messes this up and only a
fraction of the entire value is being retrieved. See below for more details.
1 term1 term2 term3 <
long name="_version_">1470628088879513600
2
> Hi,
>
> Any suggestion for tokenizer / filter / other solutions that support
> search in Solr as following -
>
> Use Case
>
> Input
>
> Solr should return
>
> All Results
>
> *
>
> All results
>
> Prefix Search
>
> Text*
>
> All data started by Text* (Prefix search)
>
> Exact Search
>
> "Auto Tex
Hi,
Any suggestion for tokenizer / filter / other solutions that support search in
Solr as following -
Use Case
Input
Solr should return
All Results
*
All results
Prefix Search
Text*
All data started by Text* (Prefix search)
Exact Search
"Auto Text"
Exact match. Only Auto Text
Partia
In Solr 4.9 there is a feature called RankQueries, that allows you to
plugin your own ranking collector. So, if you wanted to write a
ranking/sorting collector that used a thread per segment, you could cleanly
plug it in.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 9:39
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Robert Krüger wrote:
> Or will I have to set up distributed search to achieve that?
Yes — you have to shard it to achieve that. The shards could be on the
same node.
There were some discussions this year in JIRA about being able to do
thread-per-segment but it
While running a Solr-based Web application on Tomcat 6, we have been
repeatedly running into Out of Memory issues. However, these OOM errors are
not related to the Java heap. A snapshot of our Solr dashboard just before
the OOM error reported:
Physical memory: 7.13/7.29 GB
JVM-Memory: 57.90 MB -
Hello,
I just moved from Solr 4.6 to Solr 4.8.1 and I notice differences in the way
Hunspell work.
Some changes are fixes (due to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5483 I assume) but other changes
look like regressions.
To check this, I have compared the results obtained in the Anal
Hello,
I just moved from Solr 4.6 to Solr 4.8.1 and I notice differences in the way
Hunspell work.
Some changes are fixes (due to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5483 I assume) but other changes
look like regressions.
To check this, I have compared the results obtained in the Anal
Thanks for the input!
Erick - To clarify, we see the No Uncommitted Changes message repeatedly
for a number of commits (not a consistent number each time this happens)
and then eventually we see a commit that successfully finds changes, at
which point the documents are available.
Shalin - That bu
Would Solr use multithreading to process the records of a function
query as described above? In my scenario concurrent searches are not
the issue, rather the speed of one query will be the optimization
target. Or will I have to set up distributed search to achieve that?
Thanks,
Robert
On Tue, Ju
Hi Shamik,
Yes it is possible with map and query functions.
Please see Jan's example :
http://www.cominvent.com/2012/01/25/super-flexible-autocomplete-with-solr/
On Wednesday, June 11, 2014 9:34 AM, Shamik Bandopadhyay
wrote:
Hi,
I'm using edismax parser to perform a runtime boosting. H
16 matches
Mail list logo