Jeff -> Thanks Jeff this discussion on jira is really quite helpful. Thanks
for this.
Shawn -> Yes we have some plans to move to SolrCloud, Our total index size
is 40GB with 11M of Docs, Available RAM 32GB, Allowed heap space for solr
is 14GB, the GC tuning parameters using in our server
is -XX:+U
On 4/30/2014 3:47 PM, johnmu...@aol.com wrote:
> Thank you Shawn and Erick for the quick response.
>
>
> A follow up question.
>
>
> Basedon
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Common+Query+Parameters#CommonQueryParameters-Thefq%28FilterQuery%29Parameter,I
> see the "fl" (field lis
Hi,
I'm trying to implement multiple language support in Solr Cloud (4.7).
Although we've different languages in index, we were only supporting
english in terms of index and query. To provide some context, our current
index size is 35 GB with close to 15 million documents. We've two shards
with
Thank you Shawn and Erick for the quick response.
A follow up question.
Basedon
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Common+Query+Parameters#CommonQueryParameters-Thefq%28FilterQuery%29Parameter,I
see the "fl" (field list) parameter. Does this mean I canbuild my Lucene
search s
I'd add that I think you're worrying about the wrong thing. 10M
documents is not very many by modern Solr standards. I rather suspect
that you won't notice much difference in performance due to how you
construct the query.
Shawn's suggestion to use fq clauses is spot on, though. fq clauses
are re-
On 4/30/2014 2:29 PM, johnmu...@aol.com wrote:
> My question is this: what Lucene search syntax will give meback result the
> fastest? If my user is interestedin finding data within “title” and “owner”
> fields only “doc_type” “DOC”, shouldI build my Lucene search syntax as:
>
> 1) skyfall ian
Hi,
Given the following Lucene document that I’m adding to my index(and I expect to
have over 10 million of them, each with various sizes from 1 Kbto 50 Kb:
PDF
Some name
Some summary
Who owns this
10
1234567890
DOC
Some name
Some summary
Who
Hmmm, take a look at the admin/analysis page for these inputs for
alphaOnlySort. If you're using the stock Solr distro, you're probably
not considering the effects patternReplaceFilterFactory which is
removing all non-letters. So these three terms reduce to
mba
mba
mbanew
You can look at the actu
Block joins could be what you're looking for if you can upgrade to 4.5+ [
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Other+Parsers#OtherParsers-BlockJoinQueryParsers
]
I'd recommend an upgrade but if that's not possible, replicating the parent
information is the way to go.
On Wed, Apr 30
I think you are misunderstanding "denormalize" in this context. It
still may not be what you want to do for other reasons, but the usual
idea is to replicate the parent info in each of the children, so you'd
have something like:
doc1 = title:"iPad 64gb" description: "iPad 64gb with retina"
mercha
Hi guys,
I have a small SolrCloud setup (3 servers, 1 collection with 1 shard and 3
replicat). In my schema, I have a alphaOnlySort field with a copyfield.
This is a part of my managed-schema :
with the copyfield
The problem is : I query my collection wit
I have to modify a schema where I can attach nested "pricing per store"
information for a product. For example:
10010137332:{
title:"iPad 64gb"
description: "iPad 64gb with retina"
pricing:{
merchantid64354:{
locationid643:{
"USD|600"
}
is there somebody from LucidWorks who can refer to Click Score Relevance
Framework in LucidWorks Search?
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:48 PM, nolim wrote:
> Hi,
> We are using solr in production system for around ~500 users and we have
> around ~1 queries per day.
> Our user's search topics mo
Thank you, we will check it out.
On Apr 29, 2014 9:28 PM, "iorixxx [via Lucene]" <
ml-node+s472066n4133796...@n3.nabble.com> wrote:
> Hi Nolim,
>
> Actually EFF is searchable. See my comments at the end of the page
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Working+with+External+Files
On 4/19/14, 6:51 AM, "Ken Krugler" wrote:
>
>The code I see seems to be using an FSDirectory, or is there another
>layer of wrapping going on here?
>
>return new NRTCachingDirectory(FSDirectory.open(new File(path)),
>maxMergeSizeMB, maxCachedMB);
I was also curious about this subject. Not
Neha:
You _really_ need to get familiar with the admin/analysis page in the
Solr admin UI. It shows you, step-by-step, what each tokenizer and
filter in your analysis chain does. It'll save you a world of pain :).
Best,
Erick
P.S. unless you care about a bunch of really gory detail, un-check the
Please review:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
You've given us virtually no information here.
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:35 AM, neha sinha wrote:
> Hi All
>
> In my auto suggest page sorting is not correct for the suggestions i am
> getting.
> However suggestions are
Impossible to answer even if you gave much more detailed information,
you need to prototype and push one of your machines until it falls
over, then extrapolate. See:
http://searchhub.org/2012/07/23/sizing-hardware-in-the-abstract-why-we-dont-have-a-definitive-answer/
Best,
Erick
On Tue, Apr 29, 2
Did you re-index? And what do you get when adding &debug=query? That
should show you the parsed query. Have you looked at the results of
the admin/analysis page? That tool is invaluable for seeing what the
actual transformations are.
Best,
Erick
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Geepalem wrote:
Is this SolrCloud? If so you have to be quite careful to get the
expected results, in fact I'm not all that sure you can and still have
a consistent index.
Best,
Erick
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Dmitry Kan wrote:
> Yes, according to this documentation:
> https://wiki.apache.org/solr/Mergin
It¹s not just FacetComponent, here¹s the original feature ticket for
timeAllowed:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-502
As I read it, timeAllowed only limits the time spent actually getting
documents, not the time spent figuring out what data to get or how. I
think that means the primar
On 4/29/2014 11:43 PM, Aman Tandon wrote:
> My heap size is 14GB and i am not using solr cloud currently, 40GB index
> is replicated from master to two slaves.
>
> I read somewhere that it return the partial results which is computed by
> the query in that specified amount of time which is define
Hi Team,
I am getting error "null:org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: SolrCore
'master' is not available due to init failure: Error initializing
QueryElevationComponent."
Please check below for configurations
elevate.xml
--
Scema.xml
---
SolrConfig.xml
---
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Aman Tandon wrote:
> name="time">3337.0
> 6739.0
>
Most time is spent in facet counting. FacetComponent doesn't checks
timeAllowed right now. You can try to experiment with facet.method=enum or
even with https://issues.apache.org/jira/b
Playing a bit with this dataconfig I get two different results
If thk is defined in the schema.xml I get all the values for it indexed but
the subentity thematization_keys is not processed.
In the other hand , if I do not define thk in the schema.xml file only the last
value for thk is stored
This is a little complicated. What are you getting now with this
setup? Is everything else actually working? I would have thought that
even --dataSource="null"-- would cause issues.
Regards,
Alex.
Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
Current project: http://www.solr-start.com/ - Acce
Hi there
I have a problem trying to create subentities during the data import.
I have defined the following data-config
...
...
...
Hi Salman,
here is the my debug query dump please help!. I am unable to find the
wildcards in it.
true 0 10080 884159 629472 491426 259356
259029 257193 195077
193569 179369 115356
111644 86794 80621 72815 68982
65082
Hi there
I have a problem trying to create subentities during the data import.
I have defined the following data-config
...
...
...
Hi Neha,
There are a bunch of filters available and it wouldn't make sense to
suggest anything unless we know what's the intention. As they say, if you
don't know where you're going, any road will take you there.
If you want the most basic cases of being able to search for standard terms
in your
Hello Alex
Yes I reindex completely.
I am new to solr so donot have much idea of all the filters.Can u suggest
some filters which i can try?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/search-result-not-correct-in-solr-tp4133841p4133861.html
Sent from the Solr - User
Hi All
In my auto suggest page sorting is not correct for the suggestions i am
getting.
However suggestions are all correct.
Any guidance will be helpful
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Sorting-is-not-correct-in-autosuggest-tp4133859.html
Sent from the
32 matches
Mail list logo
