On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:29 PM, neha sinha wrote:
> maxGramSize="15" side="front"/>
> protected="protwords.txt" />
I think combining NGrams with Porter filters, especially in that order
will do really weird things.
Have you tried using the Admin console? You really wa
Thanks Alexandre..but still that doesn't help me
I am doing keyword search for word "Ribbing" and i am getting those products
also which have "R-B" or "RB" word in some other field.But when i am doing
search for "Ribbin" i am getting correct search results.
My field type is textfield.Please find
I had this issue too. timeAllowed only works for a certain phase of the
query. I think that's the 'process' part. However, if the query is taking
time in 'prepare' phase (e.g. I think for wildcards to get all the possible
combinations before running the query) it won't have any impact on that.
You
same issue with my search result also and i have used solr.Textfield for this
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Issue-with-solr-searching-words-with-not-able-to-search-tp4128549p4133845.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Can't figure out the exact question. Need more specific example.
However, if you look in Solr 4 Admin panel, there is analysis screen
that shows you how the text is analyzed during indexing and during
search. Putting your words there will show you the effect of various
components in your type defin
Shawn this is the first time i raised this problem.
My heap size is 14GB and i am not using solr cloud currently, 40GB index
is replicated from master to two slaves.
I read somewhere that it return the partial results which is computed by
the query in that specified amount of time which is defin
Hi I am trying to search with word Ribbing and i am also getting those result
which have R-B or RB letter in their dsecription but when i am trying to
search with Ribbin i m getting correct result...not getting any clue what to
use in my solr schema.xml.
Any guidance will be helpful.
Thanks
On 4/29/2014 10:05 PM, Aman Tandon wrote:
> I am using solr 4.2 with the index size of 40GB, while querying to my index
> there are some queries which is taking the significant amount of time of
> about 22 seconds *in the case of minmatch of 50%*. So i added a parameter
> timeAllowed = 2000 in my q
Hi,
I am using solr 4.2 with the index size of 40GB, while querying to my index
there are some queries which is taking the significant amount of time of
about 22 seconds *in the case of minmatch of 50%*. So i added a parameter
timeAllowed = 2000 in my query but this doesn't seems to be work. Pleas
mark.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Indexing-Big-Data-With-or-Without-Solr-tp4131215p4133831.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
You saved my life Shawn! Thanks!
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:54 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 4/28/2014 7:54 PM, Xavier Morera wrote:
> > Would anyone be so kind to explain what are the "Raw query parameters"
> > in Solr's admin UI. I can't find an explanation in either the reference
> > guide no
I've opened an issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6034
Feedback in Jira is appreciated.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think this is useful as well. Can you open an issue?
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Shawn Hei
Ok, https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceFactors
states that: "Retrieving the stored fields of a query result can be a
significant expense. This cost is affected largely by the number of
bytes stored per document--the higher byte count, the sparser the
documents will be distributed o
Something is really strange here:
even when configuring fields id + sort_... to docValues="true" -- so
there's nothing to get from "stored documents file" -- performance is
still terrible with ocr stored=true _even_ with my patch which stores
uncompressed like solr4.0.0 (checked with string
None that I'm aware of. A bit of googling shows the accepted solution to be an
external script via cron or something similar. I think I saw an issue open on
Apache's Jira about this but can't find it now.
Thanks,
Greg
On Apr 25, 2014, at 4:37 PM, solr2020 wrote:
> Thanks Greg. Is there any So
Hi Nolim,
Actually EFF is searchable. See my comments at the end of the page
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Working+with+External+Files+and+Processes
Ahmet
On Tuesday, April 29, 2014 9:07 PM, nolim wrote:
Thank you, it was interesting and I have learned some new things in
Thank you, it was interesting and I have learned some new things in solr :)
But the "External File Field" isn't a good option because the field is
unsearchable which it very important to us.
We think about the first option (updating document in solr) but preforming
commit only each 10 minutes - If
I think this is useful as well. Can you open an issue?
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 4/29/2014 5:25 AM, Costi Muraru wrote:
> > The problem is, I don't know the exact names of the fields I want to
> > remove. All I know is that they end in *_1600_i.
> >
> > When remo
Hi,
solr/update should be used, not /solr/select
curl 'http://localhost:8983/solr/update?commit=true&update.chain=langid'
By the way don't you have following definition in your solrconfig.xml?
langid
On Tuesday, April 29, 2014 4:50 PM, Victor Pascual
Can someone help me out with this issue please?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Wildcard-search-not-working-with-search-term-having-special-characters-and-digits-tp4133385p4133770.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Can someone help me out with this issue?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Stemming-not-working-with-wildcard-search-tp4133382p4133769.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 4/29/2014 8:48 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 4/29/2014 8:27 AM, Flavio Pompermaier wrote:
>> In which sense fields and types are now deprecated in schema.xml? Where can
>> I found any pointer about this?
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5936
>
> Here is the patch for 4.8:
>
> https://
Dear Shawn,
see attachment for my first "brute force" no-compression attempt.
Kind regards,
Jochen
Zitat von Shawn Heisey :
On 4/29/2014 4:20 AM, Jochen Barth wrote:
BTW: stored field compression:
are all "stored fields" within a document are put into one compressed chunk,
or by per-field b
On 4/29/2014 8:27 AM, Flavio Pompermaier wrote:
> In which sense fields and types are now deprecated in schema.xml? Where can
> I found any pointer about this?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5936
Here is the patch for 4.8:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12637716/SOL
Hi, Can some one share or refer to get information on the SOLR server
environment for production.
Appx. We have 40 Collections, with appx size from 300MB to 8GB (for each
Collection) and appx Total 100GB. The average increase of the size for total
may be 2-5Gb / Year.
To Get best performance f
Earlier, all tags were required to be nested inside a
tag. Similarly, all and tags were required to be nested
inside a tag. Such nesting is no longer required and you can
inter-mix , and tags as you like. Therefore,
the and tags are no longer required and can be removed.
Even if you don't
Hello!
You don't need the and section anymore, you can just
include type or field definition anywhere in the schema.xml section.
You can find more in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5228
--
Regards,
Rafał Kuć
Performance Monitoring * Log Analytics * Search Analytics
Solr & Elastics
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5228
On Apr 29, 2014, at 10:27 AM, Flavio Pompermaier wrote:
> In which sense fields and types are now deprecated in schema.xml? Where can
> I found any pointer about this?
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>
>> 28 April 2014,
In which sense fields and types are now deprecated in schema.xml? Where can
I found any pointer about this?
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> 28 April 2014, Apache Solr™ 4.8.0 available
>
> The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 4.8.0
>
> Solr is th
On 4/29/2014 5:25 AM, Costi Muraru wrote:
> The problem is, I don't know the exact names of the fields I want to
> remove. All I know is that they end in *_1600_i.
>
> When removing fields from a document, I want to avoid querying SOLR to see
> what fields are actually present for the specific doc
Hi Ahmet,
thanks for your reply. Adding &update.chain=langid to my query doesn't
work: IP:8080/solr/select/?q=*%3A*&update.chain=langid
Regarding defining the chain in an UpdateRequestHandler... sorry for the
lame question but shall I paste those three lines to solrconfig.xml, or
shall I add them
Hi,
Did you attach your chain to a UpdateRequestHandler?
You can do it by adding &update.chain=langid to the URL or defining it in a
defaults section as follows
langid
On Tuesday, April 29, 2014 3:18 PM, Victor Pascual
wrote:
Dear all,
I'm a new user of Solr. I've managed to ind
On 4/29/2014 4:20 AM, Jochen Barth wrote:
> BTW: stored field compression:
> are all "stored fields" within a document are put into one compressed chunk,
> or by per-field basis?
Here's the issue that added the compression to Lucene:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4226
It was made
Dear all,
I'm a new user of Solr. I've managed to index a bunch of documents (in
fact, they are tweets) and everything works quite smoothly.
Nevertheless it looks like Solr doesn't detect the language of my documents
nor remove stopwords accordingly so I can extract the most frequent terms.
I've
Hi Team,
I am indexing PDF using Apache Solr 3.6 . Passing around 3000
keywords using the OR operator (gardens OR flowers OR time OR train OR trees
OR etc) able to get the files containing these keywords. But every .PDF file
will not be containing all the keywords, some may contai
Thanks, Alex for the input.
Let me provide a better example on what I'm trying to achieve. I have
documents like this:
100
1
5
7
The schema looks the usual way:
The dynamic field pattern I'm using is this: id_day_i.
Each day I want to add new fields for the current day and remove the fields
On Apr 29, 2014 2:52 PM, "vignesh" wrote:
>
> Hi Team,
>
>
>
> I am indexing PDF using Apache Solr 3.6 . Passing around
3000 keywords using the OR operator and able to get the files containing
the keywords. Kindly guide me to get the keyword list in a .PDF file.
What do you mean? Do
BTW: stored field compression:
are all "stored fields" within a document are put into one compressed chunk,
or by per-field basis?
Kind regards,
J. Barth
>
> Regards,
>Alex.
> Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
> Current project: http://www.solr-start.com/ - Accelerating your
Am 29.04.2014 11:19, schrieb Alexandre Rafalovitch:
> Couple of random thoughts:
> 1) The latest (4.8) Solr has support for nested documents, as well as
> for expand components. Maybe that will let you have more efficient
> architecture: http://heliosearch.org/expand-block-join/
Yes, I've seen thi
Your question is not terribly clear. Are you having troubles indexing PDF
in general? Try the tutorial and specifically look for extract handler.
Or you already got PDF into the system but your 3000 Keyword query does not
match it? In which case it might be just that PDF extraction is limited by
d
Will the filter query execute before or after my custom search component?
In fact, I care about that, for example??if the following \docsEnum will
contain 1M docs for term \aterm without the flter query, will it be less than
1M in case that the filter query is present?
DocsEnum docsEn
Hi Team,
I am indexing PDF using Apache Solr 3.6 . Passing around 3000
keywords using the OR operator and able to get the files containing the
keywords. Kindly guide me to get the keyword list in a .PDF file.
Note : In Schema.xml have declared a unique tag "id".
Than
Couple of random thoughts:
1) The latest (4.8) Solr has support for nested documents, as well as
for expand components. Maybe that will let you have more efficient
architecture: http://heliosearch.org/expand-block-join/
2) Do you return OCR text to the client? Or just search it? If just
search it,
Can't you just specify the length range as a filter query? If your
length type is tint/tlong, Solr already has optimized code that uses
multiple resolutions depth to efficiently filter through the numbers.
Regards,
Alex.
Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
Current project: http://ww
Dear reader,
I'm trying to use solr for a hierarchical search:
metadata from the higher-levelled elements is copied to the lower ones,
and each element has the complete ocr text which it belongs to.
At volume level, of course, we will have the complete ocr text in one
and we need to store it for
Hi all,
My doc has two fileds namely "length" and "fingerprint", which stand for
the length and text of the doc. I have a custom SearchComponent that enum all
the docs according to the term to search the fingerprint. That could be very
slow because the number of docs is very huge and the o
How would you know it if you did this manually? Solr does not know
that Dutch is not valid for USA. You need to give it some sort of
signal.
One way could be to have a dynamic field for a facet which includes
country name. So, you have language_USA, language_Belgium, etc. Then,
when you do country
You could use facet.mincount parameter. default value is 0, setting it as N
would require a minimum appearance on the result Set
Iker
2014-04-29 4:56 GMT+02:00 atuldj.jadhav :
> Yes, but with my query *country:"USA" * it is returning me languages
> belonging to countries other than USA.
>
> Is
When we have duplicated documents (same uniqueID) among the shards, the query
results could be non-deterministic, this is an known issue.
The consequence when we display the search results on our UI page with
paginating is: if user click the 'last page', it could display an empty page
since the to
49 matches
Mail list logo
