I will also try to do in the perl as well, this is going to be something
great, i am excited :D
Thanks a ton!!
Thanks
Aman Tandon
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Aman Tandon wrote:
> Thank you so much sir :)
>
> Can i try in java as well?
>
> Thanks
> Aman Tandon
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 a
Thank you so much sir :)
Can i try in java as well?
Thanks
Aman Tandon
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
wrote:
> Great, Solr + Perl + Geospatial.
>
> There are two Perl clients for Solr listed on the Wiki:
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/IntegratingSolr . Are there any mor
Are you using all those cores at once? If not, there is a recent
settings to allow solr to load cores on demand.
If you are using them all, perhaps you need to look into splitting
them to different machines (horizontal scaling).
What about your caches? How many additional structures you have
conf
I guess this is definitely due to the firstsearcher defined in
solrconfig.xml, you must make some tweaks in that I hope it will help. We
are using the same typo which you just mentioned here but we are using the
indexing server separately and replicating data to our other two server so
that it won'
Great, Solr + Perl + Geospatial.
There are two Perl clients for Solr listed on the Wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/IntegratingSolr . Are there any more? If
yes, add them to the Wiki (need to ask permission to edit Wiki).
Are those two listed clients dead or alive? Do they work with Solr
4.7.1?
For the better analysis for ranking of documents, you should need to query
the index with these extra parameters(in bold)
eg...whole_query*&debug=true&wt=xml.*
Copy that xml and and paste it to http://explain.solr.pl/ you can then
easily find out the ranking alalysis in the forms of the pie charts
Hi, guys,
I need some help. After updating to SOLR 4.4 the tomcat process is
consuming about 2GBs of memory, the CPU usage is about 40% after the start
for about 10 minutes. However, the bigger problem is, I have about 1000
cores and seems that for each core a thread is created. The process has
mo
Okay sir i will mail to solr-user only, I am feeling so thankful to you for
all you help, i am java developer with a good knowledge of perl, working on
solr, actually just started working on solr for the geospatial search(not
using JTS) only, To be very frank I learned about faceting from Mr Yonik'
On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 04:23 +0200, Damien Kamerman wrote:
> What I have found with Solr 4.6.0 to 4.7.1 is that memory usage continues
> to grow with facet queries.
It allocates (potentially significant) temporary structures, yes.
> Then I tried to determine a safe limit at which the search would
Hi Aman,
Nice of you to want to help. Let's keep the discussion in the user
mailing list as opposed to the developer one (most of the people are
on both).
What is your skill set? Are you familiar with particular languages? If
so, the easiest way to contribute would be the following:
1) Find all t
Can anybody please explain me that how should i start contributing to solr,
i am novice here as well in this technology as well, but i am learning solr
day by day.
So how should i start ?
Thanks
Aman Tandon
You are running the solr in the built in jetty server or tomcat ?
First check http://:8080/ is working.
If that working then check with http://:8080/solr, which will display the
solr admin page. From this page you can check the collection1 core is available
or not and also you can view the log
Thanks Bill, Actually i have to return the distances for every results that
how far it is from the searched location thats why i am calculating the
distance using geodist separately and then using that distance for passing
to fl as well as in boosting for 250km.
*.&distance=geodist($lat,$lon,l
This really doesn't seem necessary. What is your actual field
definition? I also think your cut/paste is messed up, this is wrong:
bdeut_nullablevaluebdeutnullablevaluebdeutnullablevalue
the vertical bars in the admin/analysis page are quite important here.
Either the cut/paste is doing weird thin
Just take geodist and use the map function and send to bf or boost
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
> On Apr 9, 2014, at 8:26 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
>
> Why do you want to do this? This sounds like an XY problem, you're
> asking how to do something specific without explaining why you care,
> per
Hi All,
What I have found with Solr 4.6.0 to 4.7.1 is that memory usage continues
to grow with facet queries.
Originally I saw the issue with 40 facets over 60 collections (distributed
search). Memory usage would spike and solr would become unresponsive like
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
indexed term: bdeut_NullableValue
query term 1 : bdeut_nullablevalue (lowercase)
query term 2 : nullablevalue (lowercase)
current field type definition in order:
Whitespace Tokenizer
Word Delimiter Filter
Lowercase filter
current analysis output: [INDEX]schema_field
WT
text
bdeut_NullableValue
On 4/9/2014 2:15 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
Right, but the response in the doc when you make a request is almost,
but not quite totally, unrelated to how facet values are tallied. It's
all about what tokens are actually in your index, which you can see in
the "schema browser"...
Supplement to wh
Hello, just a quick question about the expected behavior of the SnapShooter.
We're running Solr 4.3.1 in a SolrCloud configuration, with two separate
virtual machines running Solr and three Zookeepers in various places. Our
search index is about 70GB in size. Today I took a snapshot of just one
There is a current limitation in that the code doesn’t actually look into
solrconfig.xml for the version. We should fix this, indeed. See
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/trunk/solr/contrib/map-reduce/src/java/org/apache/solr/hadoop/TreeMergeOutputFormat.java#L100-101
Wolfgang.
On Apr
In 3.5.0 we have the following.
If we searched for "c" with highlighting enabled we would get back
results such as:
cdat
crocdile
cool beans
But in the latest Solr (4.7.1) we get the full words highlighted back.
Sorry. I should have mentioned earlier. I have removed the original host
name on purpose. Thanks.
On 4/9/14, 1:42 PM, Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
Hi folks,
the URL looks wrong (misconfigured)
http://:8080/solr/collection1
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
On 09 Apr 2014, at 14:28, Rallavagu wrote:
Hi folks,
the URL looks wrong (misconfigured)
http://:8080/solr/collection1
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
On 09 Apr 2014, at 14:28, Rallavagu wrote:
> All,
>
> I see the following error in the log file. The host that it is trying to find
> is itself. Wondering if anybody experienced this befor
Agreed. But, it is failing to find route to itself. Weird.
On 4/9/14, 1:34 PM, Greg Walters wrote:
This doesn't looks like a solr-specfic issue. Be sure to check your routes and
your firewall. I've seen firewalls refuse packets and return a special flag
that results in a no route to host error
This doesn't looks like a solr-specfic issue. Be sure to check your routes and
your firewall. I've seen firewalls refuse packets and return a special flag
that results in a no route to host error.
Thanks,
Greg
On Apr 9, 2014, at 3:28 PM, Rallavagu wrote:
> All,
>
> I see the following error
All,
I see the following error in the log file. The host that it is trying to
find is itself. Wondering if anybody experienced this before or any
other info would helpful. Thanks.
709703139 [http-bio-8080-exec-43] ERROR
org.apache.solr.update.SolrCmdDistributor –
org.apache.solr.client.sol
Thanks sir, i read your post but i am confused how can i visualize the
heatmap in the interface?
By the way i am waiting for your book which will launch in july, all the
best for that :)
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 6:06 PM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com <
david.w.smi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> No movement her
Thanks Erik, the problem was that i was boost the results closer to the
city via geodist, but i also have to boost cities within 250km extra as
well.
i did it by using the map(distance,0,250,10,1) along with boosting cities
via geodist query, problem solved thanks for replying.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2
Thanks Erik, the problem was that i was boost the results closer to the
city via geodist, but i also have to boost cities within 250km extra as
well.
i did it by using the map(distance,0,250,10,1) along with boosting cities
via geodist query, problem solved thanks for replying.
On Wed, Apr 9, 20
I think I would like to do something like copyfield from a bunch of
fields into a single field, but with different analysis for each source,
and I'm pretty sure that's not a thing. Is there some alternate way to
accomplish my goal?
Which is to have a suggester that suggests words from my full
Right, but the response in the doc when you make a request is almost,
but not quite totally, unrelated to how facet values are tallied. It's
all about what tokens are actually in your index, which you can see in
the "schema browser"...
Let me know what the results are
Erick
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at
Thanks Shawn, I appreciate the information.
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 4/9/2014 7:47 AM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> > This is being triggered by adding the commitWithin param to
> > ContentStreamUpdateRequest (request.setCommitWithin(1);). My
> > configuration ha
Hi;
I have developed a Search API for such kind of cases and generate Solr
query within that API. I have also have my own query syntax.
When a search query comes into my API I generate query and does not allow
for something like *:*. On the other hand I escape query string and append
the appropri
Thanks Erick I will check this as soon as I can.
In the meantime, here is a sample query and how it looks in our index. It looks
good to me (at least that what is showing up as well in our other and older
indexes)
http://10.0.5.227:8201/solr/Current/select?q=*:*&fl=ad_job_type_id&fq=ad_job_type
That is...um...very strange. It looks to me like you have somehow
indexed a bunch of new values. I'm guessing here, but it's suspicious
that you have a value "4,1" should that have been indexed as "4" and
"1" as separate tokens?
So here's what I'd do
1> take a look at the solr/admin/schema browser
Hi All,
We just discovered that the response from Solr (4.7.1) when faceting on one of
our multi-valued fields has changed considerably.
In the past (4.6.1 and prior versions as well) we used to have something like
this: (there are 7 possible values for this attribute)
11454652
11387070
20
Hi,
What I meant for "not working properly" is that while the partition still
works the sorting inside the partitions (by position in the sale) is not.
Interesting enough it stopped to work only for all the items belonging to
the sold out items.
Ugo
On Apr 9, 2014 6:07 PM, "Erick Erickson" wrote
What does "not working properly" mean? An example would help.
What does adding &debug=query show in the two (debug=all in 3.x)? My
suspicion is that the second boost definition may be replacing the
first in 4.x, but that's only a guess.
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Ugo Matrangolo
Hi,
we are using SOLR to power a sale listing page where each product has an
availability and a position in the sale. We would like SOLR to partition
the products based on their sold_out={true|false} state and to sort the two
partitions by product position.
We started with appending to the query
Hey Giovanni, nice to meet you.
I'm the person that did the Test Driven Relevancy talk. We've got a product
Quepid (http://quepid.com) that lets you gather good/bad results for
queries and do a sort of test driven development against search relevancy.
Sounds similar to your existing scripted appro
Note that when I mentioned "filter these characters out" I had
something like PatternReplaceCharFilterFactory or LowerCaseTokenizer
in mind rather than you having to do it manually. Doesn't help
figuring out what to escape on the URL though.
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Shawn Heise
In think you're confusing initial tokenization with post-tokenization
operations. From here (and I admit it's a little opaque):
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory
bq: Splits words into subwords and performs optional transformations
on subwo
On 4/9/2014 8:39 AM, Philip Durbin wrote:
> Filtering out special characters sounds like a good idea, or possibly
> escaping some of them. I definitely want to avoid brittleness.
>
> Right now I'm passing the query relatively "as is" which means users
> can type "title:foo" to find documents that
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Samstag, 29. März 2014 16:09
> An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: WordDelimiterFilterFactory splits up hyphenated terms
although
> splitOnNumerics, generateWordParts and generateNumber
Thank you for the links.
The book is really useful, I will definitively have to spend some time
reformatting the logs to to access number of result founds, session id and
much more.
I'm also quite happy that my test cases produces similar results to the
precision reports shown at the beginning of
Filtering out special characters sounds like a good idea, or possibly
escaping some of them. I definitely want to avoid brittleness.
Right now I'm passing the query relatively "as is" which means users
can type "title:foo" to find documents that have "foo" in the "title"
field. But a query for jus
Right,
The examples posted before had a trick (both weren't pure join queries
thats why the results had score).
Having a pure join query (q={!join from=id to=id}printer) gives all the
scores as 1 as Moritz said).
Regards.
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
> On Wed
On 4/9/2014 7:47 AM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> This is being triggered by adding the commitWithin param to
> ContentStreamUpdateRequest (request.setCommitWithin(1);). My
> configuration has autoCommit max time of 15s and openSearcher set to false.
> I'm assuming that changing openSeracher to tru
Why do you want to do this? This sounds like an XY problem, you're
asking how to do something specific without explaining why you care,
perhaps there are other ways to do this.
Best,
Erick
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Aman Tandon wrote:
> How can i gave the more boost to the results within 2
This is being triggered by adding the commitWithin param to
ContentStreamUpdateRequest (request.setCommitWithin(1);). My
configuration has autoCommit max time of 15s and openSearcher set to false.
I'm assuming that changing openSeracher to true should address this, and
adding the softCommit =
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 1:33 PM, wrote:
> Hello Mikhail,
>
> thx for the clarification. I'm a little bit confused by the answer of
> Alvaro, but my own tests didn't result in a proper score, so I think you're
> right and it's still not implemented.
>
> What do you mean with the "impedance between
No movement here lately but this is something to read if you're venturing
down this path:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpatialClustering
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 1:19 AM, Aman Tandon wrote:
> How can we create the heat maps using solr spatial search?
>
> Thanks
> Aman Tandon
>
Hi Giovanni,
Here are some relevant pointers :
http://www.lucenerevolution.org/2013/Test-Driven-Relevancy-How-to-Work-with-Content-Experts-to-Optimize-and-Maintain-Search-Relevancy
http://rosenfeldmedia.com/books/search-analytics/
http://www.sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html
Ahmet
Hello Mikhail,
thx for the clarification. I'm a little bit confused by the answer of
Alvaro, but my own tests didn't result in a proper score, so I think
you're right and it's still not implemented.
What do you mean with the "impedance between Lucene and Solr"?
Why isn't the possibility of
It is about one year I'm working on an e-commerce site, and unfortunately I
have no "information retrieval" background, so probably I am missing some
important practices about relevance tuning and search engines.
During this period I had to fix many "bugs" about bad search results, which
I have sol
So what is the issue and the Solution?
Do i need to change any configurations in my solrconfig.xml ?
So I have attached my solrconfig.xml
have a look.
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 1:32 AM, Toke Eskildsen wrote:
> Shawn Heisey [s...@elyograg.org] wrote:
> > Are you using the Jetty that comes with Solr,
no i don't have any idea of it.
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
> Hello,
> Have you checked pivot facets?
> 09.04.2014 9:19 пользователь "Aman Tandon"
> написал:
>
> > How can we create the heat maps using solr spatial search?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Aman Tandon
> >
>
Hello,
Have you checked pivot facets?
09.04.2014 9:19 пользователь "Aman Tandon"
написал:
> How can we create the heat maps using solr spatial search?
>
> Thanks
> Aman Tandon
>
58 matches
Mail list logo
