Hi Dave,
Three things to note:
1. The default timeout of 60s has been raised to 3 minutes in 4.7.
Unfortunately, the timeout if not configurable.
2. The timeout happens because these commands execute on the overseer
collection processor (actually the same node as overseer) in a single
thread. So i
I'm looking into a hang as well - not sure of it involves searching as well,
but it may. Can you file a JIRA issue - let's track it down.
- Mark
> On Mar 28, 2014, at 8:07 PM, Rafał Kuć wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I have an issue with one of the SolrCloud deployments and I wanted to
> ask maybe so
On 3/28/2014 4:07 PM, Rishi Easwaran wrote:
>
> Shawn,
>
> I changed the autoSoftCommit value to 15000 (15 sec).
> My index size is pretty small ~4GB and its running on a SSD drive with ~100
> GB space on it.
> Now I see the warn message every 15 seconds.
>
> The caches I think are minimal
>
Hello!
I have an issue with one of the SolrCloud deployments and I wanted to
ask maybe someone had a similar issue. Six machines, a collection with
6 shards with a replication factor of 3. It all runs on 6 physical
servers, each with 24 cores. We've indexed about 32 milion documents
and everything
Shawn,
I changed the autoSoftCommit value to 15000 (15 sec).
My index size is pretty small ~4GB and its running on a SSD drive with ~100 GB
space on it.
Now I see the warn message every 15 seconds.
The caches I think are minimal
200
I think still something is going on. I mean 15s on
Hi, Jessica,
We've had a similar problem when DNS resolution of our Hadoop task nodes
has failed. They tend to take a dirt nap until you fix the problem
manually. Are you experiencing this in AWS as well?
I'd say the two things to do are to poll the node state via HTTP using a
monitoring tool so
There's a small SolrJ example at the bottom of this page:
http://heliosearch.org/solr/atomic-updates/
-Yonik
http://heliosearch.org - solve Solr GC pauses with off-heap filters
and fieldcache
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> I would like to begin exploring partial documen
I just wanted to bump my question in hopes that someone would see it.
Does anyone know how I might track down the cause of this timeout, or
perhaps extend the timeout?
-D
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Dave Seltzer wrote:
> I'm trying to delete some data on a 12 node Solr cloud environment
Hi,
First off, I'd like to give a disclaimer that this probably is a very edge
case issue. However, since it happened to us, I would like to get some
advice on how to best handle this failure scenario.
Basically, we had some network issue where we temporarily lost connection
and DNS. The zookeepe
Thank you!
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:s...@elyograg.org]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 3:14 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: commit=false in Solr update URL
On 3/28/2014 1:02 PM, Joshi, Shital wrote:
> You mean default for openSearcher is false right? So
And in addition, if you begin to see more onDeckSearchers warming up
simultaneously, just bumping up maxWarmingSearchers is only postponing the
proper core problem solution [1]
We have been through this ourselves!
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceProblems#Slow_commits
On Fri, Mar 28,
On 3/28/2014 1:03 PM, Rishi Easwaran wrote:
I thought auto soft commit was for NRT search (shouldn't it be optimized for
search performance), if i have to wait 10 mins how is it NRT? or am I missing
something?
You are correct, but once a second is REALLY often. If the rest of your
config is
On 3/28/2014 1:02 PM, Jean-Sebastien Vachon wrote:
I`d like to know how (it is possible) to update a field`s value using SolrJ. I
looked at the API and could not figure it out so for now I'm using the
UpdateHandler by sending it a JSON formatted document illustrating the required
changes.
Is
On 3/28/2014 1:02 PM, Joshi, Shital wrote:
You mean default for openSearcher is false right? So unless I specify
commit=false&openSearcher=true in my Solr Update URL the current searcher and
caches will not get invalidated.
If commit=false, openSearcher does not matter -- it's part of a commi
Hi Dmitry,
I thought auto soft commit was for NRT search (shouldn't it be optimized for
search performance), if i have to wait 10 mins how is it NRT? or am I missing
something?
Thanks,
Rishi.
-Original Message-
From: Dmitry Kan
To: solr-user
Sent: Fri, Mar 28, 2014 1:02 pm
Subj
Hi All,
I`d like to know how (it is possible) to update a field`s value using SolrJ. I
looked at the API and could not figure it out so for now I'm using the
UpdateHandler by sending it a JSON formatted document illustrating the required
changes.
Is there a way to do the same through SolrJ?
Thanks.
You mean default for openSearcher is false right? So unless I specify
commit=false&openSearcher=true in my Solr Update URL the current searcher and
caches will not get invalidated.
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:s...@elyograg.org]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 1
I would like to begin exploring partial document updates, but I have not
seen any documentation that would indicate that SolrJ supports this, are
there any documents describing how to do this or if it's even supported?
Hi Solr user & developers.
i am new in the world of solr search engine. i have a complex product
database structure in postgres.
Product has many product_quantity_price attrbutes in range
For e.g Product iD 1 price range is stored in product_quantity_price
table in following manner.
min_qty
You told the fieldType to use SimpleText only for the postings, not
all other parts of the codec (doc values, live docs, stored fields,
etc...), and so it used the default codec for those components.
If instead you used the SimpleTextCodec (not sure how to specify this
in Solr's schema.xml) then a
Hello all,
I'm not sure if I am missing something of if this is a bug but I am
facing an issue with the following scenario.
I am doing a range faceting on a date field with the following parameters :
facet.range.start = facet.range.end = a date
facet.range.gap = +1YEAR
facet.range.hardend = tr
Hi,
that's what I'm trying. I'm however really cautious when it comes to a
while (somethingIsTrue) { doSomething; sleep; }
Is that safe? What if the slave hungs up, the network is slow/fails, etc?
Thanks
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Chris W wrote:
> Hi
>
> You can use the "details"
Hi,
We have several tweets stored in our system which are of the following nature,
https://twitter.com/SharFairies/status/448992742257881088
I am searching for keywords like starcinema or abs-cbn.com, but these results
are not returned, how can I search in this setup. My field type is defined
On 3/28/2014 10:22 AM, Joshi, Shital wrote:
What happens when we use commit=false in Solr update URL?
http://$solr_url/solr/$solr_core/update/csv?commit=false&separator=|&trim=true&skipLines=2&_shard_=$shardid
1. Does it invalidate all caches? We really need to know this.
2. Nothing
yes, and I can see that (as expected) per the field type:
1. the indexed value is lowercased
2. stripped of non-alpha characters
3. multiple consecutive whitespace is removed
4. trimmed
5. goes thru the SynonymFilterFactory where:
a. the indexed value of "Marina/Former Fort Ord" is "marina former
: I'm not sure if I am missing something of if this is a bug but I am facing an
: issue with the following scenario.
The specific scnerios you are descirbing is an interesting edge case --
but i believe it's working as designed.
basically the range generation logic that computes the set of "(lo
Hi Rishi,
Do you really need soft-commit every second? Can you make it 10 mins, for
example?
What is happening (conditional on checking your logs) is that several
commits (looks like 2 in your case) are arriving in a quick succession.
Then system is starting to warmup the searchers, one per each
Hi,
What happens when we use commit=false in Solr update URL?
http://$solr_url/solr/$solr_core/update/csv?commit=false&separator=|&trim=true&skipLines=2&_shard_=$shardid
1. Does it invalidate all caches? We really need to know this.
2. Nothing happens to existing searcher, correct?
3
Shalin,
I am running 4.7 and seeing this behavior :(
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
wrote:
> Yes, there are known bugs with EdgeNGram filters. I think they are fixed in
> 4.4
>
> See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3907
>
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:17 AM,
You can use a timeout? In our system we do that same but with a timeout of
around 30 minutes for any replication to slave completes. So far any
replication > 30 minutes (even for cores as big as 10G) indicated a
problem with a core or network on our side
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 6:43 AM, Fermin
Grep for uuid in config directory. It's probably in solrconfig.xml
especially if you have dedup chain.
Regards,
Alex
On 28/03/2014 7:52 pm, "Silvia Suárez" wrote:
> Dear all:
>
> I'm trying to add a solr document into the solr collection. The code that I
> am using is like this:
>
> public
Hey,
In the Solr CoreAdmin CREATE action you have the ability to define arbitrary
properties by defining propery.[name] = value, this works well in both Solr 3.x
and Solr 4.x. To change a property value on a core in Solr 3.x you could run
the CREATE command again and this would overwrite the va
Hi all,
I've been using the SimpleTextCodec in the past, but I just noticed something
odd…
I'm running Solr 4.3, and enable the SimpleText posting format via something
like:
The resulting index does have the expected _0_SimpleText_0.pst text output, but
I just noticed that the other fil
Dear all:
I'm trying to add a solr document into the solr collection. The code that I
am using is like this:
public static void addDocuments (HttpSolrServer serverCore2)
throws SolrServerException, IOException {
SolrInputDocument doc1 = new SolrInputDocument();
doc1.addField( "c_noticia", "
Hi all,
I have a few of questions about the context-aware AnalyzingInfixSuggester:
- is it possible to choose a specific field for the context at runtime (say, I
want to limit suggestions by a field that I've already faceted on), or is it
limited to the hardcoded CONTEXTS_FIELD_NAME?
- is the co
Hello Solr Users,
In my system I have multiple records belonging to users, and I need to
perform a query to find users who have records that meet the criteria of
that query. For example, if my record has the field "search" and I query for
search:((item1 AND item2) NOT item3), I want to find all us
36 matches
Mail list logo
