On 2/13/2014 5:53 PM, Jay Potharaju wrote:
> I was wondering if its possible to call a storedProcedure in the
> deltaImportQuery. This is what I 'm trying to do.
>
>query="SELECT * FROM table1
> INNER JOIN tabl2 ON table2.tbl1Id = table1.id"
>
> deltaImportQue
Lajos,
Just did a quick test on 4.6.1 UNLOADing a SolrCloud replica using the core
admin API and it worked as expected. I'm running with the core.properties
setup. Are you running with an old style solr.xml?
The org.apache.solr.core.CorePropertiesLocator.delete() method in trunk
and 4x are prote
I think it is not possible to use stored procedures in DIH.
Please see : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1262
On Friday, February 14, 2014 3:02 AM, Jay Potharaju
wrote:
I was wondering if its possible to call a storedProcedure in the
deltaImportQuery. This is what I 'm trying to do
I was wondering if its possible to call a storedProcedure in the
deltaImportQuery. This is what I 'm trying to do.
In my store procedure I am deleting n rows and inserting them back. And
then finally run a select statement to get some data back from the delta
import query.
Can anyone tell me
Hi all,
I just want to verify that it is no longer possible to unload a Cloud
core via the Core API UNLOAD command, correct?
I had two situations: one where I wanted to remove old replicas in a
node that I was deactivating (and I had already created new replicas)
and one where I needed to re
On 2/13/2014 3:17 PM, Jared Rodriguez wrote:
I just regressed to Solrj 4.6.1 with http client 4.2.6 and am trying to
reproduce the problem. Using YourKit to profile and even just manually
simulating a few users at once, I see the same problem of open sockets. 6
sockets opened to the solr server
That did fix my issue, thanks so much.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/java-lang-IllegalArgumentException-when-using-SolrJ-CloudSolrServer-tp4116585p4117279.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks Shawn,
I just regressed to Solrj 4.6.1 with http client 4.2.6 and am trying to
reproduce the problem. Using YourKit to profile and even just manually
simulating a few users at once, I see the same problem of open sockets. 6
sockets opened to the solr server and 2 of them still open after
Hi Annette,
You might want to find initial version of patch attached
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5725
I'd be happy to find out performance improvement on your setup, let me know if
you need help with patching your version of solr.
--
Alexey
-Original Message-
From: A
On 2/13/2014 1:38 PM, Jared Rodriguez wrote:
I am using solr/solrj 4.6.1 along with the apache httpclient 4.3.2 as part
of a web application which connects to the solr server via solrj
using CloudSolrServer(); The web application is wired up with Guice, and
there is a single instance of the Clou
I found out that generated files are the same. I think this is because that
these lines inside build file
Note that the gennorm2 and icupkg tools must be on your PATH. These
tools
are part of the ICU4C package. See http://site.icu-
I found out that generated files are the same. I think this is because that
these lines inside build file
Note that the gennorm2 and icupkg tools must be on your PATH. These
tools
are part of the ICU4C package. See http://site.icu-
I am using solr/solrj 4.6.1 along with the apache httpclient 4.3.2 as part
of a web application which connects to the solr server via solrj
using CloudSolrServer(); The web application is wired up with Guice, and
there is a single instance of the CloudSolrServer class used by all inbound
requests.
thanks
for help..
its working
Regards,
Kishan Parmar
Software Developer
+91 95 100 77394
Jay Shree Krishnaa !!
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Saumitra Srivastav <
saumitra.srivast...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Change the type of 'status' field to 'string'. At present it must be
> 'text_en' and he
Hi Kishan,
Facets are generated from indexed values. Probably you have stemmer in your
analysis chain. Thus 'verified' is indexed as 'verifi'. Remove stemming filter
factory from your field type definition.
Ahmet
On Thursday, February 13, 2014 8:53 PM, Kishan Parmar
wrote:
hi
when i do
Change the type of 'status' field to 'string'. At present it must be
'text_en' and hence while indexing its getting tokenized.
After changing the type in schema.xml you will have to re-index the
documents to see the expected facet response.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.47206
hi
when i do quering " status:verified " for my core and adding facet then i
get result but for facet it wrong output as "verifi " not "verified"
why this is happaning ??
any suggestion for this
Regards,
Kishan Parmar
Software Developer
+91 95 100 77394
Jay Shree Krishnaa !!
On 2/13/2014 9:20 AM, Murugan, Muniraja (CTR) Offshore wrote:
I am getting "ORA-04030: out of process memory when trying to allocate 4032 bytes" error
when I try to index xmltype data from Oracle DB. I have registered in Solr support the ID is
"SOLR-5723"
The issue tracker is for bugs and fea
Hi
I am using SOLR 4.6.
I need to highlight span queries. But when I fire a span query, there are
no highlight snippets.
Is there any highlighter out there that can be used?
Regards
Puneet
Hi guys,
I'm looking for reviewers for our newly published book titled, ‘Apache Solr
Beginner’s Guide’
I'll be happy to provide a free eBook copy to anyone interested in writing a
review for this book specifically on their Blog/Website, Amazon, Goodreads,
Dzone within 2-3 weeks after receiving th
Dear All,
I am getting "ORA-04030: out of process memory when trying to allocate 4032
bytes" error when I try to index xmltype data from Oracle DB. I have registered
in Solr support the ID is "SOLR-5723"
I have xmltype data in my oracle DB. I am converting xmltype to clob and to xml
string usi
Use the OR operator between the specific clauses.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: EXTERNAL Taminidi Ravi (ETI, Automotive-Service-Solutions)
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 9:09 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Multiple Column Condition with Relevance/Rank
Hel
Hello, Someone can help me on implementing the below query in Solr, I will
using a rank in MS SQL and a return distinct Productid
Select productid from products where SKU = "101"
Select Productid from products where ManufactureSKU = "101"
Select Productid from product where SKU Like "101%"
Sel
Yonik Seeley :
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 8:25 AM, wrote:
Is there any workaround to perform atomic updates on blocks or do I have to
re-index the parent document and all its children always again if I want to
update a field?
The latter, unfortunately.
Is there any plan to change this behavio
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 8:25 AM, wrote:
> Is there any workaround to perform atomic updates on blocks or do I have to
> re-index the parent document and all its children always again if I want to
> update a field?
The latter, unfortunately.
-Yonik
http://heliosearch.org - native off-heap filter
Hello,
I'm using block join to store nested documents with a huge number of children.
I want to update some fields in the parent document using atomic
updates, because I don't want to re-index all the child documents again.
So, as far as I understood atomic updates, solr is reindexing the
w
Hi Tri,
Look at this:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/201307.mbox/%3CCAEN8dyX_Am_v4f=5614eu35fnhb5h7dzkmkzdfwvrrm1xpq...@mail.gmail.com%3E
Roman
On 13 Feb 2014 03:39, "Tri Cao" wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
> Thanks a lot for the suggestion.
>
> After thinking more about this, I t
Hi Rajeev,
You can take this:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/201307.mbox/%3CCAEN8dyX_Am_v4f=5614eu35fnhb5h7dzkmkzdfwvrrm1xpq...@mail.gmail.com%3E
I haven't created the jira yet, but I have improved the plugin. Recently, I
have seen a use case of passing 90K identifiers /
I was having similar problem with delta import.
I am using solr 4.6 and making use of ${dih.last_index_time},
${dih.delta.xxx} shorter variable names.
I think the issue in previously discussed posts in the thread lies in
deltaQuery and deltaImportQuery.
if deltaQuery="select *rowId* from MyTab
Thanks Mike, that surely helps to clarify the difference.
On the related note, if we have provide a scoring support for solr
join, instead of using lucene join, what would be best way to do that .
There's one suggestion that david gave below :- build a custom QParser
and call Lucene's JOIN (J
Hi Mikhail,
Don't you
think org.apache.lucene.codecs.bloom.FuzzySet.java, contains(BytesRef
value) methods returns probability of having a field, and it is a place
where we are using hashing ?
Are there any other place in source which when given with document id,
could determine by calculating it
I suspect (not certain) one reason for the performance difference with
Solr vs Lucene joins is that Solr operates on a top-level reader?
This results in fast joins, but it means whenever you open a new
reader (NRT reader) there is a high cost to regenerate the top-level
data structures.
But if th
Hi Alexey,
I would be very interested in your progress with this. Your use case seems
to match ours, we found enum to be much quicker than fc particularly for
multivalued fields. We found that fc caused memory issues and caused us to
frequently lose nodes. We, like you, have no interest in the
Harshvardhan,
There almost nothing like this in bare Lucene, the closest analogy is
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCaching#documentCache
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Harshvardhan Ojha <
ojha.harshvard...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Mikhail,
>
> Thanks for sharing this nice link. I am pretty com
Hi Mikhail,
Thanks for sharing this nice link. I am pretty comfortable with searching
of lucene and this is very beginner level question on storage, mainly
Hashing part(storage and retrieval).
Which DS(I don't know currently), is being used to keep and again calculate
that hash to get document bac
Hello
I think you can start from
http://www.lucenerevolution.org/2013/What-is-in-a-lucene-index
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Harshvardhan Ojha <
ojha.harshvard...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a question regarding retrieval of documents by lucene.
> I know lucene uses many files
Hi All,
I have a question regarding retrieval of documents by lucene.
I know lucene uses many files on disk to keep documents, each comprising
fields in it, and uses many IR algorithms, and inverted index to match
documents.
My question is :
1. How lucene stores these documents inside file system
Hi Joel,Thanks a lot for the suggestion.After thinking more about this, I think I could skip the faceting count for now,and so just provide a filtering option without display how many items that wouldbe there after filtering. After all, even Google Shopping product search doesn'tdisplay the facet c
Dear all,
we are currenty using Solr 4.3.1 in production (With SolrCloud).
We encounter quite the same problem described in this other old post:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-CloudSolrServer-Zookeeper-disconnects-and-re-connects-with-heavy-memory-usage-consumption-td4026421.html
39 matches
Mail list logo
